Literature DB >> 24768385

Association of computed tomography-derived left atrial size with major cardiovascular events in the general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study.

Amir A Mahabadi1, Marie H Geisel2, Nils Lehmann2, Christian Lammerding3, Hagen Kälsch3, Marcus Bauer3, Susanne Moebus2, Karl-Heinz Jöckel2, Raimund Erbel3, Stefan Möhlenkamp4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography based data suggests that left atrial (LA) size is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Once non-contrast cardiac CT is performed for prevention purposes, information on the LA is readily available. We aimed to determine whether LA area from non-contrast cardiac CT is associated with incident major cardiovascular (CV) events, independent of CV risk factors and coronary artery calcium (CAC), based on a general population cohort.
METHODS: Subjects aged 45-75 years without prevalent CV disease from the population-based Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study were enrolled between 2000 and 2003. LA area at the level of the mitral valve was quantified from non-contrast cardiac CT. Major CV events (coronary event, stroke, CV death) were assessed during follow-up. The association of LA with events was assessed using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 3958 subjects (59.2 ± 7.7 years, 53% female) were included. Mean LA area was 17.64 ± 4.22 cm(2) (range: 7.16-44.13 cm(2)). During 8.0 ± 1.5 years of follow-up, 221 major CV events occurred. In univariate analysis, increase of LA size by 1 standard deviation was associated with nearly 50% excess events (HR (95%CI): 1.48 (1.32-1.65)), which remained significant after adjustment for CV risk factors (HR (95%CI): 1.25 (1.09-1.43)) and when additionally adjusting for CAC (HR (95%CI): 1.22 (1.07-1.40)). Associations for LA size were similar for each endpoint and again independent of risk factors and CAC (coronary event: HR (95%CI): 1.21 (1.01-1.45); stroke: 1.31 (1.05-1.63); CV death: 1.33 (1.03-1.71)).
CONCLUSION: LA size is associated with incident major CV events independent of risk factors and CAC-score. Once cardiac CT imaging is performed, assessment of LA size may complement information of this imaging modality.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Coronary artery calcium; Epidemiology; Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study; Left atrium

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768385     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  5 in total

1.  Predicting Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus from Left Atrial Volume and Confirmation by Computed Tomography with Delayed Enhancement.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Osawa; Rine Nakanishi; Indre Ceponiene; Negin Nezarat; William J French; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Multi-modality imaging: Bird's-eye view from the 2014 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Andrew J Einstein; Farooq A Chaudhry; Steven G Lloyd; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Relation of premature atrial complexes with stroke and death: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bao-Tao Huang; Fang-Yang Huang; Yong Peng; Yan-Biao Liao; Fei Chen; Tian-Li Xia; Xiao-Bo Pu; Mao Chen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Investigating interactions between epicardial adipose tissue and cardiac myocytes: what can we learn from different approaches?

Authors:  Katja Rietdorf; Hilary MacQueen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Left Atrial Anatomy, Size, and Function.

Authors:  Petr Kuchynka; Jana Podzimkova; Martin Masek; Lukas Lambert; Vladimir Cerny; Barbara Danek; Tomas Palecek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.