Literature DB >> 24768281

Assessing and improving cross-border chemical incident preparedness and response across Europe.

James Stewart-Evans1, Lisbeth Hall2, Slawomir Czerczak3, Kevin Manley4, Alec Dobney5, Sally Hoffer2, Anna Pałaszewska-Tkacz3, Agnieszka Jankowska3.   

Abstract

Good practices in emergency preparedness and response for chemical incidents include practices specific to the different functions of exposure assessment (e.g., within the monitoring function, the use of mobile monitoring equipment; within the modelling function, the use of rapid dispersion models with integrated mapping software) and generic practices to engage incident response stakeholders to maximise exposure assessment capabilities (e.g., sharing protocols and pre-prepared information and multi-agency training and exercising). Such practices can optimise cross-border collaboration. A wide range of practices have been implemented across MSs during chemical incident response, particularly during incidents that have cross-border and trans-boundary impacts. This paper proposes a self-assessment methodology to enable MSs, or organisations within MSs, to examine exposure assessment capabilities and communication pathways between exposure assessors and public health risk assessors. Where gaps exist, this methodology provides links to good practices that could improve response, communication and collaboration across local, regional and national borders. A fragmented approach to emergency preparedness for chemical incidents is a major obstacle to improving cross-border exposure assessment. There is no one existing body or structure responsible for all aspects of chemical incident preparedness and response in the European Union. Due to the range of different organisations and networks involved in chemical incident response, emergency preparedness needs to be drawn together. A number of recommendations are proposed, including the use of networks of experts which link public health risk assessors with experts in exposure assessment, in order to coordinate and improve chemical incident emergency preparedness. The EU's recent Decision on serious cross-border threats to health aims to facilitate MSs' compliance with the International Health Regulations, which require reporting and communication regarding significant chemical incidents. This provides a potential route to build on in order to improve chemical incident preparedness and response across Europe.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Chemical incident; Emergency planning; Emergency preparedness; Emergency response; Exposure assessment; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768281     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  3 in total

1.  Lessons learnt from implementation of the International Health Regulations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amitabh B Suthar; Lisa G Allen; Sara Cifuentes; Christopher Dye; Jason M Nagata
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Constructing the Indicators of Assessing Human Vulnerability to Industrial Chemical Accidents: A Consensus-based Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach.

Authors:  Farin Fatemi; Ali Ardalan; Benigno Aguirre; Nabiollah Mansouri; Iraj Mohammadfam
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  Hospital, health, and community burden after oil refinery fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012.

Authors:  Linda L Remy; Ted Clay; Vera Byers; Paul E Rosenfeld
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 5.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.