W-X Lim1, Y-F Cheng1, T-L Huang1, T-Y Chen1, L L-C Tsang1, H-Y Ou1, C-Y Yu2, H-W Hsu1, C-L Chen3. 1. Liver Transplantation Program and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Liver Transplantation Program and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address: y7192215@ms17.hinet.net. 3. Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Due to the shortage of cadaver liver grafts in Asia, more than 90% of biliary atresia (BA) patients require living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), but the factors that influence liver graft regeneration in pediatric patients are still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential predisposing factors that encourage liver graft regeneration in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Case notes and Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography studies performed before and 6 months after transplantation of 103 BA patients who underwent LDLT were reviewed. The predisposing factors that triggered liver regeneration were compiled from statistical analyses and included the following: age, gender, body weight and height, spleen size, graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), post-transplantation total portal flow, and vascular complications. RESULTS: Seventy-two pediatric recipients were enrolled in this study. The liver graft regeneration rate was 29.633 ± 36.61% (range, -29.53-126.27%). The size of the spleen (P = .001), post-transplantation portal flow (P = .004), and age (P = .04) were correlated lineally with the regeneration rate. The GRWR was negatively correlated with the regeneration rate (P = .001) and was the only independent factor that affected the regeneration rate. When the GRWR was >3.4, patients tended to have poor and negative graft regeneration (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Large-for-size grafts have negative effect on regeneration rates because liver grafts that are too large can compromise total portal flow and increase vascular complications, especially when the GRWR is >3.4. Thus, optimal graft size is more essential than other factors in a pediatric LDLT patient. Crown
OBJECTIVE: Due to the shortage of cadaver liver grafts in Asia, more than 90% of biliary atresia (BA) patients require living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), but the factors that influence liver graft regeneration in pediatric patients are still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential predisposing factors that encourage liver graft regeneration in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Case notes and Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography studies performed before and 6 months after transplantation of 103 BA patients who underwent LDLT were reviewed. The predisposing factors that triggered liver regeneration were compiled from statistical analyses and included the following: age, gender, body weight and height, spleen size, graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), post-transplantation total portal flow, and vascular complications. RESULTS: Seventy-two pediatric recipients were enrolled in this study. The liver graft regeneration rate was 29.633 ± 36.61% (range, -29.53-126.27%). The size of the spleen (P = .001), post-transplantation portal flow (P = .004), and age (P = .04) were correlated lineally with the regeneration rate. The GRWR was negatively correlated with the regeneration rate (P = .001) and was the only independent factor that affected the regeneration rate. When the GRWR was >3.4, patients tended to have poor and negative graft regeneration (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Large-for-size grafts have negative effect on regeneration rates because liver grafts that are too large can compromise total portal flow and increase vascular complications, especially when the GRWR is >3.4. Thus, optimal graft size is more essential than other factors in a pediatric LDLT patient. Crown