Literature DB >> 24767221

Incidence of discordant temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Bethany Durling1, Andrew Toren2, Vivek Patel3, Steven Gilberg4, Ezekiel Weis5, David Jordan6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the rate of discordant biopsy results (i.e., 1 side negative, 1 side positive) in patients who underwent initial bilateral temporal artery biopsies for suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA).
DESIGN: A cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy were enrolled. Of the 259 patients enrolled, 250 underwent initial bilateral temporal artery biopsies.
METHODS: Positive biopsies were defined based on accepted histologic definitions. Healed arteritis was considered a positive result. Clinical information was collected for all patients using a questionnaire administered by an ophthalmologist. Pathology results, including biopsy length (as measured by the pathologist), and laboratory information (i.e., serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] and C-reactive protein [CRP] levels) were collected from digital patient records for statistical analysis. The main outcome was the rate of discordant biopsy in consecutive patients who underwent initial bilateral temporal artery biopsy.
RESULTS: Giant cell arteritis was confirmed in 62 (24.2%) of the 250 patients, including 3 patients with biopsies recorded as healed arteritis. The rate of discordant biopsy was 4.4% with 11 unilaterally positive biopsies. There was no statistical difference between the length of the left- and right-sided biopsies in either the unilaterally or bilaterally positive groups (p = 0.13 and p = 0.79, respectively). The average maximum ESR value for the bilateral group (58.7 mm/h) was significantly higher than the average maximum ESR value for the unilateral group (30.7 mm/h, p = 0.03). The average maximum CRP value for the bilateral group was 59.2 mg/L and 28.6 mg/L for the unilateral group (p = 0.30). Discordance between the localization of symptoms and the side of positive biopsy occurred in 3 patients (i.e., 3 patients had left-sided symptoms only, yet a right-sided positive biopsy).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of discordant biopsies in patients who underwent initial bilateral temporal artery biopsies was considerable in our patient cohort. Given this reasonably high rate of discordance between sides, as well as the lack of correlation between side of positivity and laterality of presenting symptoms, we recommend initial bilateral temporal artery biopsies to enhance the diagnostic certainty of the disease.
Copyright © 2014 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24767221     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  2 in total

Review 1.  Updates in the Diagnosis and Management of Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Surabhi Uppal; Mohanad Hadi; Sheetal Chhaya
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  A study of temporal artery biopsy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Ronald Butendieck; Kenneth Calamia; Adam Sandin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.