Literature DB >> 24766982

Characteristics of plaque disruption by intravascular ultrasound in women presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Sohah N Iqbal1, Frederick Feit1, G B John Mancini2, David Wood2, Rima Patel1, Ivan Pena-Sing1, Michael Attubato1, Leonid Yatskar1, James N Slater1, Judith S Hochman1, Harmony R Reynolds3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a prospective study, we previously identified plaque disruption (PD: plaque rupture or ulceration) in 38% of women with myocardial infarction (MI) without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Underlying plaque morphology has not been described in these patients and may provide insight into the mechanisms of MI without obstructive CAD.
METHODS: Forty-two women with MI and <50% angiographic stenosis underwent IVUS (n = 114 vessels). Analyses were performed by a blinded core laboratory. Sixteen patients had PD (14 ruptures and 5 ulcerations in 18 vessels). Plaque area, % plaque burden, lumen area stenosis, eccentricity, and remodeling index were calculated for disrupted plaques and largest plaque by area in each vessel.
RESULTS: Disrupted plaques had lower % plaque burden than the largest plaque in the same vessel (31.9% vs 49.8%, P = .005) and were rarely located at the site of largest plaque (1/19). Disrupted plaques were typically fibrous and were not more eccentric or remodeled than the largest plaque in the same vessel.
CONCLUSIONS: Plaque disruption was often identifiable on IVUS in women with MI without obstructive CAD. Plaque disruption in this patient population occurred in fibrous or fibrofatty plaques and, contrary to expectations based on prior studies of plaque vulnerability, did not typically occur in eccentric, outwardly remodeled, or soft plaque in these patients. Plaque disruption rarely occurred at the site of the largest plaque in the vessel. These findings suggest that the pathophysiology of PD in women with MI without angiographically obstructive CAD may be different from MI with obstructive disease and requires further investigation.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24766982     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  11 in total

1.  Gender-Related Differences in Clinical Presentation and Angiographic Findings in Patients with Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): A Single-Center Observational Registry.

Authors:  Mauro Gitto; Francesco Gentile; Alexandra N Nowbar; Alaide Chieffo; Rasha Al-Lamee
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 2.  Coronary Arterial Function and Disease in Women With No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; C Noel Bairey Merz; Colin Berry; Rohit Samuel; Jacqueline Saw; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Robert Sykes; Viviany R Taqueti; Janet Wei
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  Advanced Imaging and Diagnostic Methods in the Assessment of Suspected Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Authors:  Joanna M Joly; Vera Bittner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Identifying Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque in Rabbits Using DMSA-USPIO Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Investigate the Effect of Atorvastatin.

Authors:  Chunmei Qi; Liangrong Deng; Dongye Li; Weiheng Wu; Lei Gong; Yong Li; Qingdui Zhang; Tao Zhang; Chao Zhang; Yu Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical characteristics and outcome in patients with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery: an observation study from Chinese population.

Authors:  Menghuan Li; Yuan He; Iokfai Cheang; Zhiyong Zhang; Yang Liu; Hui Wang; Xiangqing Kong
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Role of Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Beyond Conventional Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Brent Gudenkauf; Allison G Hays; Jacqueline Tamis-Holland; Jeffrey Trost; Daniel I Ambinder; Katherine C Wu; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Roger S Blumenthal; Garima Sharma
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 7.  Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction.

Authors:  Changlin Zhai; Hongyan Fan; Yujuan Zhu; Yunqing Chen; Liang Shen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; Akiko Maehara; Raymond Y Kwong; Tara Sedlak; Jacqueline Saw; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Ehtisham Mahmud; Janet Wei; Kevin Marzo; Mitsuaki Matsumura; Ayako Seno; Anais Hausvater; Caitlin Giesler; Nisha Jhalani; Catalin Toma; Bryan Har; Dwithiya Thomas; Laxmi S Mehta; Jeffrey Trost; Puja K Mehta; Bina Ahmed; Kevin R Bainey; Yuhe Xia; Binita Shah; Michael Attubato; Sripal Bangalore; Louai Razzouk; Ziad A Ali; Noel Bairey Merz; Ki Park; Ellen Hada; Hua Zhong; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Modelling the Impact of Atherosclerosis on Drug Release and Distribution from Coronary Stents.

Authors:  C M McKittrick; S Kennedy; K G Oldroyd; S McGinty; C McCormick
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Troponin-Positive Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries and Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Definition, Etiologies, and Role of CT and MR Imaging.

Authors:  Seung Min Yoo; Sowon Jang; Jeong A Kim; Eun Ju Chun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.