| Literature DB >> 24766822 |
Sándor Hornok1, Jenő Kontschán, Dávid Kováts, Richárd Kovács, Dorottya Angyal, Tamás Görföl, Zsolt Polacsek, Zsuzsa Kalmár, Andrei D Mihalca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Europe two ixodid bat tick species, Ixodes vespertilionis and I. simplex were hitherto known to occur.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24766822 PMCID: PMC4029976 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Map of Hungary showing the geographical distribution of cave-related, allopatric genotypes (coloured dots), and collection sites of sp. nov. (stars). was removed from in southern Hungary (triangle). The table insert illustrates nucleotide differences between the genotypes according to a reference sequence with the highest similarity to the Hungarian isolates.
Collection data of in caves according to seasons
| | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number | - | 5 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 114 | 160 | 92 | 1 | - | 3 | 3 | - | 52 | 34 | 17 |
| Percentage | - | 14% | 66% | 20% | 4% | 30% | 42% | 24% | 14% | - | 43% | 43% | - | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| Presence of bats | +++ | ++ | + | ++ | ||||||||||||
Next to each season the number of visists per number of caves is shown in brackets.
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationship of sp. nov., genotypes and inferred from COI gene analysis in the present study, in comparison with other spp. and based on sequences deposited in the GenBank.
Morphological comparison of , sp. nov. and female
| 10 | 7 | 4.5 | |
| long (tarsus I: 1.6) | long (tarsus I: 1.5) | moderately long (tarsus I: 0.73) | |
| - dorsally posterolaterally flange | - dorsally posterolaterally flange | - dorsally no flange (ventrolaterally triangular ridge) | |
| - posteriorly sinuous | |||
| - posteriorly straight | |||
| - posteriorly slightly curved with dorsal ridge | |||
| long, narrow (0.39 + 0.22) | short, broad (0.28 + 0.16) | short (0.16 + 0.14) | |
| distinct | distinct | indistinct | |
| long, 15 rows of slender teeth, ventrally in 6-8 lines | medium, 10 rows of broad teeth, ventrally in 4 lines | short, 8 rows of broad teeth, ventrally in 4-6 lines | |
| large, oval, interval broad | large, oval, interval slightly broad | large, oval, interval narrow | |
| anterolaterally prominent | anterolaterally very few | anterolaterally prominent | |
| 1.76/1.08 (approx. 1.6) | 1.15/0.95 (approx. 1.2) | 1.13/0.8 (approx. 1.4) | |
| dense | sparse | dense | |
| posteroexternally concave, surface flat | posteroexternally convex, surface rounded | posteroexternally concave | |
| parallel | posteriorly slightly divergent | posteriorly markedly divergent | |
| oval, regular outline | oval, irregular outline | (sub)circular, broad |
*Descriptions according to Arthur (1956), Babos and Janisch (1958), Nosek and Sixl (1972).
Sizes are given in mm.
Figure 3Larva of sp. nov. collected from and showing apolysis (C), in comparison with larvae from the cave wall without (A) or with apolysis (B); and (D) larva collected from .
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures of engorged sp. nov. nymph (A) and unfed nymph (B) (bars: 1 mm).
Figure 5SEM pictures of head parts of female ticks: engorged sp. nov. (A - dorsal, bar = 500 μm; B - ventral, bar = 250 μm) and unfed (C - dorsal, bar = 250 μm; D - ventral, bar = 250 μm).
Figure 6SEM pictures of ventral parts of female ticks: engorged sp. nov. (A - coxae, bar = 500 μm; B - sparse hair covering, bar = 2 mm) and unfed (C - coxae, bar = 250 μm; D - dense hair covering, bar = 2 mm).