| Literature DB >> 24766774 |
Feng Yang, Zai-shen Jia, Jia-lin Xing, Zheng Wang, Yuan Liu, Xing Hao, Chun-jing Jiang, Hong Wang, Ming Jia, Xiao-tong Hou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The addition of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support has been shown to improve coronary bypass graft flows and cardiac function in refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of additional IABP support on the cerebral blood flow (CBF) in patients with peripheral VA ECMO following cardiac procedures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24766774 PMCID: PMC4006449 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1Scheme showing the study protocol. N group, pulsatile pressure ≤ 10 mmHg; P group, pulsatile pressure greater than 10 mmHg.
Hemodynamic status details of the two groups
| heart rate | IABP | 92.8 ± 9.6 | 100.0 ± 13.5 |
| turned off IABP | 95.0 ± 13.5 | 97.8 ± 12.3 | |
| systolic pressure (mmHg) | IABP | 90.8 ± 5.2 | 89.6 ± 5.4 |
| turned off IABP | 89.6 ± 4,9 | 90.1 ± 4.8 | |
| diastolic pressure (mmHg) | IABP | 79.1 ± 6.2 | 72.6 ± 5.7 |
| turned off IABP | 77.6 ± 5.3 | 72.6 ± 6.8 | |
| mean artery pressure (mmHg) | IABP | 82.6 ± 5.4 | 78.9 ± 5.4 |
| turned off IABP | 81.6 ± 4.6 | 77.8 ± 5.7 | |
| oxygen saturation (%) | IABP | 95.0 ± 2.6 | 94.7 ± 2.4 |
| turned off IABP | 94.5 ± 2.4 | 94.4 ± 2.9 | |
| VA ECMO flow (L/min) | | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.4 |
| Hct (%) | 29.4 ± 4.6 | 29.7 ± 4.3 |
No statistically significant hemodynamic changes occurred between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Figure 2Typical middle cerebral artery flow waveform obtained by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A, B, N group. C, D, P group. (A) The CBFV while IABP is turned off in severe cardiac failure. (B) The CBFV while ECMO was combined with IABP support in severe cardiac functional failure. (C) The CBEV while IABP is turned off in spontaneous cardiac function. (D) The CBFV while ECMO was combined with IABP support in spontaneous cardiac function.
Figure 3Mean CBF in the N group and the P group under ECMO with IABP. An IABP significantly decreased the mean CBF during non-pulsatile pressure ECMO support. An IABP significantly increased the mean CBF during pulsatile pressure ECMO support. The results are reported as the mean ± standard. *, p < 0.01 between the IABP support data and the data without IABP support.
Outcome of the CBF in the patients
| VA ECMO with IABP (ml/min) | 251.47 ± 79.28 | 239.47 ± 95.60 | 261.68 ± 82.45 |
| VA ECMO alone (turned off IABP) (ml/min) | 251.30 ± 79.47 | 257.68 ± 97.21 | 244.43 ± 45.85 |
| 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 |