BACKGROUND: Most literature regarding fireworks injuries are from outside the United States, whereas US-based reports focus primarily on children and are based on datasets which cannot provide accurate estimates for subgroups of the US population. METHODS: The 2006-2010 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was used to identify patients with fireworks injury using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification external cause of injury code E923.0. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were examined to determine the mechanism, type, and location of injury. Sampling weights were applied during analysis to obtain US population estimates. RESULTS: There were 25,691 emergency department visits for fireworks-related injuries between 2006 and 2010. There was no consistent trend in annual injury rates during the 5-y period. The majority of visits (50.1%) were in patients aged <20 y. Most injuries were among males (76.4%) and were treated in hospitals in the Midwest and South (42.0% and 36.4%, respectively) than in the West and Northeast (13.3% and 8.3%, respectively) census regions. Fireworks-related injuries were most common in July (68.1%), followed by June (8.3%), January (6.6%), December (3.4%), and August (3.1%). The most common injuries (26.7%) were burns of the wrist, hand, and finger, followed by contusion or superficial injuries to the eye (10.3%), open wounds of the wrist, hand, and finger (6.5%), and burns of the eye (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department visits for fireworks injuries are concentrated around major national holidays and are more prevalent in certain parts of the country and among young males. This suggests that targeted interventions may be effective in combating this public health problem.
BACKGROUND: Most literature regarding fireworks injuries are from outside the United States, whereas US-based reports focus primarily on children and are based on datasets which cannot provide accurate estimates for subgroups of the US population. METHODS: The 2006-2010 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was used to identify patients with fireworks injury using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification external cause of injury code E923.0. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were examined to determine the mechanism, type, and location of injury. Sampling weights were applied during analysis to obtain US population estimates. RESULTS: There were 25,691 emergency department visits for fireworks-related injuries between 2006 and 2010. There was no consistent trend in annual injury rates during the 5-y period. The majority of visits (50.1%) were in patients aged <20 y. Most injuries were among males (76.4%) and were treated in hospitals in the Midwest and South (42.0% and 36.4%, respectively) than in the West and Northeast (13.3% and 8.3%, respectively) census regions. Fireworks-related injuries were most common in July (68.1%), followed by June (8.3%), January (6.6%), December (3.4%), and August (3.1%). The most common injuries (26.7%) were burns of the wrist, hand, and finger, followed by contusion or superficial injuries to the eye (10.3%), open wounds of the wrist, hand, and finger (6.5%), and burns of the eye (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department visits for fireworks injuries are concentrated around major national holidays and are more prevalent in certain parts of the country and among young males. This suggests that targeted interventions may be effective in combating this public health problem.
Authors: Salma A Abdou; Banafsheh Sharif-Askary; Karina Charipova; Patrick L Reavey; Vishal D Thanik; Brinkley Sandvall; Jeffrey Friedrich; Angelo B Lipira; Michael J Terry; Laura K Tom Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2021-03-07
Authors: Christina Hickey; Christopher Gordon; Karen Galdanes; Martin Blaustein; Lori Horton; Steven Chillrud; James Ross; Lital Yinon; Lung Chi Chen; Terry Gordon Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: Daan T Van Yperen; Cornelis H Van der Vlies; J Tjeerd H N De Faber; Xander Smit; Suzanne Polinder; Charlotte J M Penders; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Michael H J Verhofstad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Bobbie Roca; Vikki Carr de los Reyes; Sheryl Racelis; Imelda Deveraturda; Ma Nemia Sucaldito; Enrique Tayag; Michael O'Reilly Journal: Western Pac Surveill Response J Date: 2015-11-11