| Literature DB >> 24766277 |
Mark D Bertness1, Caitlin P Brisson, Tyler C Coverdale, Matt C Bevil, Sinead M Crotty, Elena R Suglia.
Abstract
Salt marsh habitat loss to vegetation die-offs has accelerated throughout the western Atlantic in the last four decades. Recent studies have suggested that eutrophication, pollution and/or disease may contribute to the loss of marsh habitat. In light of recent evidence that predators are important determinants of marsh health in New England, we performed a total predator exclusion experiment. Here, we provide the first experimental evidence that predator depletion can cause salt marsh die-off by releasing the herbivorous crab Sesarma reticulatum from predator control. Excluding predators from a marsh ecosystem for a single growing season resulted in a >100% increase in herbivory and a >150% increase in unvegetated bare space compared to plots with predators. Our results confirm that marshes in this region face multiple, potentially synergistic threats.Entities:
Keywords: Trophic cascade; experimental predator removal; herbivore release; predator depletion; salt marsh die-off
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24766277 PMCID: PMC4286111 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Lett ISSN: 1461-023X Impact factor: 9.492
Figure 1Predator exclusion (a) and open control (b) plots after 3 months of predator exclusion. All plots had similar initial cordgrass cover. In the predator exclusion plot (a) note the increased density of S. reticulatum burrows and thinned S. alterniflora from grazing. In the control (b) note the dense cordgrass monoculture, fewer S. reticulatum burrows and minimal bare space.
Figure 2End of season herbivory (a) on common source cordgrass transplants across treatments, cordgrass transplants in predator exclusion cages experienced ∼2× higher herbivory than cordgrass transplants in the cage control and control plots. (Letters, Tukey HSD). Pooled aboveground cordgrass biomass (b) mirrored differences in herbivory, caged plots had less biomass than cage control and control plots and biomass was consistently lower at higher elevations along the grazing border (Letters, Tukey HSD).
Figure 3End of season pooled subquadrat (0.5 m2) burrow counts (a) revealed that there were significantly more burrows in caged plots than cage control and control plots (*Denotes significant difference, Tukey HSD). Bare space (b) was also higher in caged plots than cage control and control plots, and overall bare space was higher at high elevations along the grazing border (Letters, Tukey HSD).