S McDonald1, L Sharpe, A Blaszczynski. 1. Clinical Psychology Unit, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: Research has suggested that the additional impact of a diabetes-related amputation is associated with poorer physical functioning, poorer psychosocial outcome and greater body image disturbance. However, no study to date has compared patients with diabetes with and without amputation and adequately controlled for additional medical morbidity often found among individuals with an amputation. The aim of this study was to statistically control for any group differences on medical and demographic variables to examine the isolated psychosocial impact of diabetes-related amputation. METHODS: Individuals with diabetes with an amputation (n = 50) were compared to a control sample (individuals with diabetes without an amputation; n = 240). All participants completed a demographic and medical questionnaire, as well as measures of psychological distress, quality of life and body image. RESULTS: The results indicated that, in univariate analyses, depression, physical quality of life and body image disturbance were all poorer in the amputee group. These differences remained for body image disturbance (P = 0.005), but were no longer significant for depression or physical quality of life in multivariate analyses controlling for important demographic and medical variables. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that the impact of diabetes-related amputation was significant for body image disturbance. However, it appears that other psychosocial outcomes are better accounted for by medical co-morbidities common in this group rather than the amputation itself. This research certainly highlights that clinicians must assess for and address all potential medical contributors to psychosocial outcomes, rather than assuming that people will experience poorer outcomes following amputation.
AIMS: Research has suggested that the additional impact of a diabetes-related amputation is associated with poorer physical functioning, poorer psychosocial outcome and greater body image disturbance. However, no study to date has compared patients with diabetes with and without amputation and adequately controlled for additional medical morbidity often found among individuals with an amputation. The aim of this study was to statistically control for any group differences on medical and demographic variables to examine the isolated psychosocial impact of diabetes-related amputation. METHODS: Individuals with diabetes with an amputation (n = 50) were compared to a control sample (individuals with diabetes without an amputation; n = 240). All participants completed a demographic and medical questionnaire, as well as measures of psychological distress, quality of life and body image. RESULTS: The results indicated that, in univariate analyses, depression, physical quality of life and body image disturbance were all poorer in the amputee group. These differences remained for body image disturbance (P = 0.005), but were no longer significant for depression or physical quality of life in multivariate analyses controlling for important demographic and medical variables. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that the impact of diabetes-related amputation was significant for body image disturbance. However, it appears that other psychosocial outcomes are better accounted for by medical co-morbidities common in this group rather than the amputation itself. This research certainly highlights that clinicians must assess for and address all potential medical contributors to psychosocial outcomes, rather than assuming that people will experience poorer outcomes following amputation.