BACKGROUND: Stigma has been suggested as a possible contributor to the high rates of treatment attrition in substance-dependent individuals, but no published empirical studies have examined this association. OBJECTIVES: The present paper assessed the relationship between baseline stigma variables and length of treatment stay in a sample of patients in a residential addictions treatment unit. METHODS: The relationship between baseline stigma variables (self-stigma, enacted stigma, and shame) and length of stay for participants (n=103) in a residential addictions treatment unit was examined. RESULTS: Higher self-stigma predicted longer stay in residential addictions treatment, even after controlling for age, marital status, race, overall mental health, social support, enacted stigma, and internalized shame. However, other stigma variables (i.e. internalized shame, stigma-related rejection) did not reliably predict length of treatment stay. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with other findings suggesting that people with higher self-stigma may have a lowered sense of self-efficacy and heightened fear of being stigmatized and therefore retreat into more protected settings such as residential treatment, potentially resulting in higher treatment costs. Specialized clinical interventions may be necessary to help participants cope with reduced self-efficacy and fear of being stigmatized.
BACKGROUND: Stigma has been suggested as a possible contributor to the high rates of treatment attrition in substance-dependent individuals, but no published empirical studies have examined this association. OBJECTIVES: The present paper assessed the relationship between baseline stigma variables and length of treatment stay in a sample of patients in a residential addictions treatment unit. METHODS: The relationship between baseline stigma variables (self-stigma, enacted stigma, and shame) and length of stay for participants (n=103) in a residential addictions treatment unit was examined. RESULTS: Higher self-stigma predicted longer stay in residential addictions treatment, even after controlling for age, marital status, race, overall mental health, social support, enacted stigma, and internalized shame. However, other stigma variables (i.e. internalized shame, stigma-related rejection) did not reliably predict length of treatment stay. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with other findings suggesting that people with higher self-stigma may have a lowered sense of self-efficacy and heightened fear of being stigmatized and therefore retreat into more protected settings such as residential treatment, potentially resulting in higher treatment costs. Specialized clinical interventions may be necessary to help participants cope with reduced self-efficacy and fear of being stigmatized.
Authors: K M Kampman; A I Alterman; J R Volpicelli; I Maany; E S Muller; D D Luce; E M Mulholland; A F Jawad; G A Parikh; F D Mulvaney; R M Weinrieb; C P O'Brien Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2001-03
Authors: Jason B Luoma; Alyssa K O'Hair; Barbara S Kohlenberg; Steven C Hayes; Lindsay Fletcher Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Georg Schomerus; Patrick W Corrigan; Thomas Klauer; Philipp Kuwert; Harald J Freyberger; Michael Lucht Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Shelly L Sayre; Joy M Schmitz; Angela L Stotts; Patricia M Averill; Howard M Rhoades; John J Grabowski Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2002 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Abigail W Batchelder; Judith T Moskowitz; Jennifer Jain; Michael Cohn; Maya A Earle; Adam W Carrico Journal: Cogn Behav Pract Date: 2019-04-16
Authors: Heloísa Garcia Claro; Márcia Aparecida Ferreira de Oliveira; Janet Titus Bourdreaux; Ivan Filipe de Almeida Lopes Fernandes; Paula Hayasi Pinho; Rosana Ribeiro Tarifa Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2015 Nov-Dec
Authors: Allison J Ober; Katherine E Watkins; Sarah B Hunter; Brett Ewing; Karen Lamp; Mimi Lind; Kirsten Becker; Keith Heinzerling; Karen C Osilla; Allison L Diamant; Claude M Setodji Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 2.497