Literature DB >> 24766035

Intralocus sexual conflict and environmental stress.

David Berger1, Karl Grieshop, Martin I Lind, Julieta Goenaga, Alexei A Maklakov, Göran Arnqvist.   

Abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict (IaSC) occurs when selection at a given locus favors different alleles in males and females, placing a fundamental constraint on adaptation. However, the relative impact of IaSC on adaptation may become reduced in stressful environments that expose conditionally deleterious mutations to selection. The genetic correlation for fitness between males and females (rMF ) provides a quantification of IaSC across the genome. We compared IaSC at a benign (29°C) and a stressful (36°C) temperature by estimating rMF s in two natural populations of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus using isofemale lines. In one population, we found substantial IaSC under benign conditions signified by a negative rMF (-0.51) and, as predicted, a significant reduction of IaSC under stress signified by a reversed and positive rMF (0.21). The other population displayed low IaSC at both temperatures (rMF : 0.38; 0.40). In both populations, isofemale lines harboring alleles beneficial to males but detrimental to females at benign conditions tended to show overall low fitness under stress. These results offer support for low IaSC under stress and suggest that environmentally sensitive and conditionally deleterious alleles that are sexually selected in males mediate changes in IaSC. We discuss implications for adaptive evolution in sexually reproducing populations.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; condition dependence; genetic quality; sexual selection; sexually antagonistic; temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24766035     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  36 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Debora Goedert; Aaron M Reedy; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.

Authors:  Julian Baur; David Berger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Miguel Gomez-Llano; John T Waller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sex-dependent expression of behavioural genetic architectures and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Selective harvest focused on sexual signal traits can lead to extinction under directional environmental change.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Carlos Martínez-Ruiz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Temperature effects on life-history trade-offs, germline maintenance and mutation rate under simulated climate warming.

Authors:  David Berger; Josefine Stångberg; Karl Grieshop; Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.