Literature DB >> 24765172

Overexpression of collagen VI α3 in gastric cancer.

Xiaojun Xie1, Xiaosun Liu1, Qing Zhang1, Jiren Yu1.   

Abstract

Collagen VI is significant in the progression of numerous types of cancer. Type VI collagen consists of three α-chains and collagen VI α3 (COL6A3) encodes the α3 chain. The overexpression of COL6A3 has been demonstrated to correlate with high-grade ovarian cancer and contributes to cisplatin resistance; however, its role in human gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. Using microarray meta-analysis, COL6A3 was observed to be frequently overexpressed in the GC tissues, furthermore, this overexpression was identified in five GC cell lines. A microarray-based co-expression network analysis was conducted and identified a total of 62 genes that were co-expressed with COL6A3, with the majority of the genes being involved in cancer-related processes, such as cell differentiation, migration and adhesion. Network analysis of these 62 genes demonstrated that fibronectin 1, a well-characterized oncogene, was located at the center of the COL6A3 co-expression network. Therefore, COL6A3 may act as an oncogene in human GC and the antagonism of COL6A3 may be an effective therapeutic treatment for GC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collagen VI α3; gastric cancer; meta-analysis; microarray

Year:  2014        PMID: 24765172      PMCID: PMC3997710          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.1910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common type of malignancy worldwide, which results in 989,600 novel cases and 738,000 fatalities annually, specifically in Asian countries (1). Recent advancements in diagnosis and treatment modalities have been made, however, the prognosis of GC patients remains poor. As current therapeutic strategies are insufficient and do not achieve complete tumor ablation, it is important to analyze the molecular mechanisms of GC and identify novel biomarkers, as well as targets for therapeutic approaches, which may improve the clinical outcome for GC patients. Collagen VI was initially identified as an extracellular matrix protein. It forms a microfilament network and binds to extracellular matrix proteins via its functional subdomains, which is important for the organization of fibrillar collagens and adhesion to the basement membrane (2). Collagen VI has recently attracted interest due to its involvement in breast and ovarian cancers (3–5). It is composed of three distinct α-chains (α1, -2 and -3) and collagen VI α3 (COL6A3) encodes the α3 chain, which is markedly longer than the other two chains (6). In a previous study, COL6A3 was shown to be upregulated in ovarian cancer (7), and Sherman-Baust et al (5) identified that the expression of COL6A3 was correlated with cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cell lines. Furthermore, highly or moderately differentiated ovarian tumors expressed lower levels of COL6A3 than poorly differentiated tumors, which indicated that the expression of COL6A3 was associated with the grade of the ovarian tumor (5). A recent exon array analysis study demonstrated that an alternative long isoform of COL6A3 was expressed, almost exclusively, in cancer samples, and may potentially serve as a novel cancer biomarker (8). Currently, the majority of studies relating to the oncogenic role of this gene focus on ovarian and breast cancer, however, the expression pattern and the biological functions of COL6A3 in human GC remain unknown. In the present study, the authors investigated whether the expression level of COL6A3 was altered in GC, and a microarray meta-analysis was performed in order to assess the functional characteristics and molecular mechanisms of COL6A3 in GC.

Materials and methods

Gene expression patterns in GC

The Oncomine database (http://www.oncomine.org) was used to examine the differences in the transcriptional profiles between GC tissues and the adjacent normal tissues (9). Only the datasets that contained cancer versus normal analysis at the mRNA expression level were selected for analysis in the present study. In total, four GeneChip datasets, consisting of 318 paired GC and non-cancerous tissues, were selected according to the criteria shown in Table I.
Table I

Oncomine datasets obtained for use in the present study.

Dataset (Ref no.)SamplesData link
Chen Gastric (11)103 gastric adenocarcinomas and 29 normal gastric mucosa sampleshttp://genome-www.stanford.edu/gastric_cancer2/index.shtml
Cho Gastric (12)65 gastric adenocarcinoma, 19 paired surrounding normal tissue and six gastrointestinal stromal tumor sampleshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE13861
D’Errico Gastric (13)31 paired gastric carcinoma and adjacent normal gastric mucosa and seven unmatched gastric carcinoma sampleshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE13911
Wang Gastric (14)12 paired gastric carcinoma and normal gastric mucosa samples and three normal gastric tissue sampleshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE19826

Cell culture

Five human GC cell lines (AGS, HGC-27, BGC-823, SGC-7901 and MGC80-3) and one immortalized gastric cell line (GES-1) were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology (Shanghai, China). All cell lines were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco-BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (SAFC Biosciences Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis

TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract the total RNA from whole cells, and reverse-transcription was conducted using a TaqMan® Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The DNA was amplified using an ABI® 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan). The ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative RNA expression, which was normalized to GAPDH expression. PCR was performed using the following primers: forward, 5′-GAGACGCAGTGAGTGGGAAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGAGTCTTGTGCTGCTTGCT-3′ for COL6A3; and forward, 5′-CTCTCTGCTCCTCCTGTTCGAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGAGCGATGTGGCTCGGCT-3′ for GAPDH.

Co-expression analysis

The Oncomine database co-expression analysis tool was used to conduct the co-expression analysis of the microarray datasets. Using the co-expression score, the top 150 genes of each dataset were selected. The genes that appeared in at least two of the three datasets were defined as COL6A3 co-expressed genes.

Gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis

GO and pathway enrichment analysis were conducted to examine COL6A3 co-expressed genes using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/). The categories, GOTERM_BP_3, GOTERM_CC_2 and GOTERM_MF_3 were selected, and the other options were set as defaults.

Construction of the gene interaction network

The gene interaction network was constructed using a gene expression pattern scanner (GePS: http://www.genomatix.de/) as described previously (10).

Statistical analysis

The independent Student’s t test was used to analyze the differences between two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Data are presented as the means ± SD. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

COL6A3 is commonly overexpressed in GC

To determine the changes in the transcriptional pattern of GC cells, microarray datasets from the studies by Chen et al (11), Cho et al (12), D’Errico et al (13) and Wang et al (14) were analyzed using the Oncomine database. COL6A3 demonstrated a significant overexpression in the GC cells (P=3.98×10−15; Fig. 1A). To confirm this finding, the expression of COL6A3 in one immortalized gastric cell line (GES-1) and five GC cell lines (AGS, HGC-27, BGC-823, SGC-7901, MGC80-3) was analyzed using qPCR. The five GC cell lines exhibited ≥2.5-fold overexpression of COL6A3 compared with that of GES-1 cells (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

COL6A3 was overexpressed in gastric carcinoma tissue. (A) The expression pattern of COL6A3 in four GC datasets that were obtained using the Oncomine database; whiskers, 10th and 90th percentile; box boundaries, 75th and 25th percentile; line within the box, median. *P<0.001. (B) Relative COL6A3 expression of five GC cell lines (HGC-27, MGC80-3, SGC-7901, BGC-823 and AGS) compared with the mean value of a normal GC cell line (GES-1). COL6A3; collagen VI α3; GC, gastric cancer.

Genes co-expressed with COL6A3

A previous study indicated that genes which are co-expressed in different conditions may be functionally related or co-regulated (15). Therefore, a microarray co-expression analysis was conducted to identify the genes that were co-expressed with COL6A3. The dataset from the study by D’Errico et al (13) did not contain any co-expression data, therefore, the other three datasets consisting of 249 paired tissues were selected for inclusion in the co-expression analysis. Using a cut-off of the top 150 genes, which were identified by the co-expression score from each dataset, and with at least two appearances on the co-expressed list, 62 genes were identified as genes that were co-expressed with COL6A3 (Table II).
Table II

Collagen VI α3 co-expressed genes with the cut-off for selection defined as an appearance in two datasets.

GeneGene nameNo. of appearances
COL6A3Collagen type VI α33
COL1A2Collagen type I α23
COL1A1Collagen type I α13
COL12A1Collagen type XII α13
THY1Thy-1 cell surface antigen3
THBS2Thrombospondin 23
BGNBiglycan3
CTHRC1Collagen triple helix repeat containing 13
SULF1Sulfatase 13
FAPFibroblast activation protein-α3
SFRP4Secreted frizzled-related protein 43
TIMP1Tissue inhibitor of metallopeptidase 13
WNT2Wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family member 23
COL11A1Collagen type XI α13
BMP1Bone morphogenetic protein 13
SPOCK1Sparc/osteonectin cwcv and kazal-like domains proteoglycan (testican) 13
SERPINH1Serpin peptidase inhibitor clade H (heat shock protein 47) member 1 (collagen binding protein 1)2
CPXM1Carboxypeptidase X (M14 family) member 12
INHBAInhibin β A2
CDH11Cadherin 11, type 2, OB-cadherin (osteoblast)2
RAB31Member of the RAS oncogene family2
ANTXR1Anthrax toxin receptor 12
NID2Nidogen 2 (osteonidogen)2
PDGFRBPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor β polypeptide2
COL4A2Collagen type IV α22
COL4A1Collagen type IV α12
TGFBITransforming growth factor β-induced (68kDa)2
PLAUPlasminogen activator urokinase2
PRRX1Paired related homeobox 12
LOXLysyl oxidase2
PLXDC2Plexin domain containing 22
LAMC1Laminin γ1 (formerly LAMB2)2
OLFML2BOlfactomedin-like 2B2
CLDN4Claudin 42
FAM83DFamily with sequence similarity 83, member D2
ITGB5Integrin β52
TNCTenascin C2
SNAI2Snail family zinc finger 22
FRMD6FERM domain containing 62
COL6A1Collagen type VI α12
NUAK1NUAK family, SNF1-like kinase 12
HSPG2Heparan sulfate proteoglycan 22
NOTCH3Notch 32
CD276Cluster of differentiation 276 molecule2
WNT5AWingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family member 5A2
ECM1Extracellular matrix protein 12
PDPNPodoplanin2
TNFAIP6Tumor necrosis factor α-induced protein 62
ADAM12A disintegrin and metallo-peptidase domain 122
GAS1Growth arrest-specific 12
THBS1Thrombospondin 12
COL10A1Collagen type X α12
FNDC1Fibronectin type III domain containing 12
SPHK1Sphingosine kinase 12
MMP11Matrix metallopeptidase 11 (stromelysin 3)2
CST1Cystatin SN2
KRT80Keratin 802
PMEPA1Prostate transmembrane protein, androgen induced 12
SPP1Secreted phosphoprotein 12
TNFRSF11BTumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11b2
IGF2BP3Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 32
MFAP2Microfibrillar-associated protein 22
EHD2EH-domain containing 22

GO and pathway enrichment analysis of COL6A3 co-expressed genes

GO and pathway enrichment analysis were conducted using the DAVID functional annotation chart tool (16) to further analyze the underlying mechanisms of COL6A3 and its co-expressed genes. In total, 36 biological process, seven cellular constituents, seven molecular function terms and six Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathways were indicated to be significantly enriched (P<0.01; Table III). The extracellular matrix organization indicated the most marked enrichment among the GO biological process terms. The predominant function of COL6A3 has been identified to be the organization of matrix components, which supported the reliability of the present analysis. Furthermore, cell processes, such as cell differentiation, cell-substrate adhesion, regulation of cell proliferation, regulation of cell migration, cell motion and cell migration, which are considered to be cancer-related biological processes, were enriched (Fig. 2). This result indicated that COL6A3 may have been involved in the biological processes that promote the progression of GC.
Table III

GO and pathway enrichment analysis of COL6A3 co-expressed genes.

CategoryTermFunctionCountP-valueFold enrichmentFDR
GOTERM _BP_3GO:0030198ECM organization115.88×10−1226.867380268.02×10−9
GO:0048731System development292.30×10−93.1616082273.13×10−6
GO:0048513Organ development242.54×10−83.5077404093.47×10−5
GO:0009653Anatomical structure morphogenesis192.42×10−74.0320455233.30×10−4
GO:0009888Tissue development149.88×10−75.3477656411.35×10−3
GO:0022603Regulation of anatomical structure morphogenesis71.89×10−48.1193245462.57×10−1
GO:0030154Cell differentiation173.01×10−42.6379479264.10×10−1
GO:0051093Negative regulation of developmental process74.64×10−46.8653748096.31×10−1
GO:0031589Cell-substrate adhesion55.47×10−412.960146327.43×10−1
GO:0051239Regulation of multicellular organismal process127.52×−43.2531765371.02
GO:0048519Negative regulation of biological process179.44×10−42.3831792241.28
GO:0050793Regulation of developmental process109.95×10−43.7688259341.35
GO:0060348Bone development51.28×10−310.325970241.73
GO:0009887Organ morphogenesis91.33×10−34.0534925731.80
GO:0006928Cell motion82.20×10−34.2782125122.96
GO:0042127Regulation of cell proliferation102.90×10−33.2276857423.88
GO:0032101Regulation of response to external stimulus53.27×10−37.9880147154.36
GO:0002683Negative regulation of immune system process44.02×10−312.241873155.34
GO:0009611Response to wounding84.05×10−33.8342470635.39
GO:0030334Regulation of cell migration54.06×10−37.5153511225.40
GO:0016477Cell migration64.13×10−35.5221493035.49
GO:0016337Cell-cell adhesion64.13×10−35.5221493035.49
GO:0050865Regulation of cell activation54.60×10−37.2576819416.08
GO:0008284Positive regulation of cell proliferation75.02×10−34.2950050136.64
GO:0009790Embryonic development85.90×10−33.5777305347.75
GO:0007566Embryo implantation35.94×10−325.401886797.80
GO:0044259Multicellular organismal macromolecule metabolic process36.33×10−324.582471098.30
GO:0040012Regulation of locomotion56.37×10−36.6150746868.34
GO:0051272Positive regulation of cell motion46.39×10−310.368117068.36
GO:0040017Positive regulation of locomotion46.39×10−310.368117068.36
GO:0048870Cell motility66.46×10−34.9645381358.46
GO:0051270Regulation of cell motion56.48×10−36.5807996878.49
GO:0048523Negative regulation of cellular process148.98×10−32.14232780211.57
GO:0050867Positive regulation of cell activation49.00×10−39.15383307811.59
GO:0009792Embryonic development ending in birth or egg hatching69.13×10−34.56321319611.76
GO:0032844Regulation of homeostatic process49.67×10−38.91294273412.41
GOTERM_CC_3GO:0031012ECM262.51×10−2619.521395232.54×10−23
GO:0005578Proteinaceous ECM251.40×10−2520.237023311.41×10−22
GO:0044420ECM part158.00×10−1833.209474148.10×10−15
GO:0005581Collagen105.53×10−1574.009685235.62×10−12
GO:0005604Basement membrane61.13×10−519.925684491.14×10−2
GO:0005615Extracellular space124.49×10−54.5378201164.55×10−2
GO:0005886Plasma membrane253.82×10−31.714547913.80
GO:0031252Cell leading edge39.65×10−25.63117170264.22
GOTERM_MF_3GO:0019838Growth factor binding63.98×10−515.219825073.80×10−2
GO:0005518Collagen binding43.06×10−429.594104312.92×10−2
GO:0005102Receptor binding111.21×10−33.3067904361.15
KEGG_PATHWAYhsa04512ECM-receptor interaction141.41×10−1628.259.99×10−14
hsa04510Focal adhesion141.52×10−1111.805970151.35×10−08

GO, gene ontolgy; COL6A3, collagen VI α3; FDR, false discovery rate; BP; biological process; CC, cellular constituent; ECM, extracellular matrix; MF, molecular function; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. P<0.01 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Figure 2

Gene ontology analysis of collagen VI α3 co-expressed genes was conducted using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery functional annotation chart tool. *P<0.01 for the pathway enrichment of COL6A3 co-expressed genes compared with Homo sapiens transcriptome background.

Network analysis of COL6A3

A network analysis was conducted using Genomatix GePS to construct the functional connections of COL6A3 co-expressed genes. FN1 was highlighted in this network, as it functionally associated with 50 (81.9%) COL6A3 co-expressed genes, which indicated that FN1 may act as a significant regulator in the COL6A33 regulatory network (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Network construction of COL6A3 co-expressed genes. The biological interactions of COL6A3 co-expressed genes were analyzed and visualized using a gene expression pattern scanner. The category of each gene is distinguished by its shape for factors, such as kinases and transporters. The direction of the arrow demonstrates whether a gene is upstream or downstream of another gene. Dashed line, co-cited genes; solid line, genes with an expertly curated connection. Genes with no interactions are not shown.

Discussion

COL6A3 is located on chromosome 2q37 and codes for the α-3 chain, one of the three α-chains of type VI collagen. It is hypothesized that COL6A3 accelerates cell anchoring and signaling through its interaction with integrin (17) and disruption of this gene results in muscular dystrophy (2). In addition to integrin, COL6A3 interacts with other matrix components, such as decorin, hyaluronan, heparan sulfate and NG2 proteoglycans (18). Furthermore, COL6A3 may promote neural crest cell migration and attachment, which is significant in the later stages of neural crest development (19). Recently, COL6A3 has received increasing attention, due to its abnormal expression and the occurrence of alternative splicing in numerous types of cancer. Previous genome exon array studies have identified cancer-specific alternative splicing of exons 3, 4 and 6 of COL6A3 in colon, pancreatic, bladder and prostate cancer (8,20). Furthermore, COL6A3 was identified to be overexpressed in pancreatic (21) and ovarian cancer (7), which was associated with the poor differentiation of tumor cells (5). Although COL6A3 has been investigated in numerous other types of cancer, its biological mechanisms and expression pattern in GC remain unclear. In the era of post-genomic medicine, microarray meta-analysis has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy for identifying gene expression changes in various types of cancer (22,23). In the present study, a microarray meta-analysis was performed to identify that COL6A3 was frequently overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues, indicating that an increased expression of COL6A3 was associated with the carcinogenesis of GC. The underlying mechanisms that result in the increased expression of COL6A3 may relate to the transcriptional regulation of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (24), however, this requires further investigation. To further define the biological mechanisms of COL6A3, a co-expression analysis was conducted to investigate the genes that are functionally related to, or co-regulated by, COL6A3. This identified 62 co-expression genes for COL6A3, the majority of which are involved in the processes of extracellular matrix organization such as lysyl oxidase, collagen type IV α2, TGF-β-induced and laminin γ1 (Table II). The functional network analysis of these co-expression genes was dominated by FN1, which demonstrated its predominant functional connections with other genes. FN1 is an adhesive protein of the extracellular matrix and it contains two apparently identical subunits with a range of binding sites for cell surface and extracellular ligands. It has been indicated that FN1 is involved in various aspects of cancer-related biological processes, such as cellular adhesion and migration. FN1 was identified to be overexpressed in hepatocellular, gastrointestinal, head and neck cancers (25,26), which indicated its involvement in tumorigenesis. Furthermore, Waalkes demonstrated that advanced-stage renal cancer patients exhibited increased FN1 expression when compared with patients exhibiting organ-confined diseases (27). Thus, the present study provided a mechanistic insight into the role of COL6A3 in GC. In conclusion, the present study indicated that COL6A3 was regularly overexpressed in GC cells. A list of potential partner genes of COL6A3 was generated, the majority of which are involved in cancer-related processes, and a functional network of COL6A3 was constructed, which provided promising results to enable future studies to identify the precise role of COL6A3.
  27 in total

1.  Tumor-specific expression and alternative splicing of the COL6A3 gene in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hwyda Arafat; Melissa Lazar; Khalifa Salem; Galina Chipitsyna; Qiaoke Gong; Te-Cheng Pan; Rui-Zhu Zhang; Charles J Yeo; Mon-Li Chu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Elevated levels and fragmented nature of cellular fibronectin in the plasma of gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Ujjwala M Warawdekar; Surekha M Zingde; K S N Iyer; P Jagannath; Ashok R Mehta; Narendra G Mehta
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Gene expression signature-based prognostic risk score in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jae Yong Cho; Jae Yun Lim; Jae Ho Cheong; Yun-Yong Park; Se-Lyun Yoon; Soo Mi Kim; Sang-Bae Kim; Hoguen Kim; Soon Won Hong; Young Nyun Park; Sung Hoon Noh; Eun Sung Park; In-Sun Chu; Waun Ki Hong; Jaffer A Ajani; Ju-Seog Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Mechanisms of disease: adipokines and breast cancer - endocrine and paracrine mechanisms that connect adiposity and breast cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Schäffler; Jürgen Schölmerich; Christa Buechler
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-04

5.  Upregulated INHBA expression is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Quan Wang; Yu-Gang Wen; Da-Peng Li; Jun Xia; Chong-Zhi Zhou; Dong-Wang Yan; Hua-Mei Tang; Zhi-Hai Peng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Differential gene expression between normal and tumor-derived ovarian epithelial cells.

Authors:  R S Ismail; R L Baldwin; J Fang; D Browning; B Y Karlan; J C Gasson; D D Chang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Fibronectin 1 mRNA expression correlates with advanced disease in renal cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Waalkes; Faranaz Atschekzei; Mario W Kramer; Jörg Hennenlotter; Gesa Vetter; Jan U Becker; Arnulf Stenzl; Axel S Merseburger; Andres J Schrader; Markus A Kuczyk; Jürgen Serth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Reversing effect of ring finger protein 43 inhibition on malignant phenotypes of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunyang Xing; Wuhua Zhou; Songming Ding; Haiyang Xie; Wu Zhang; Zhe Yang; Bajin Wei; Kangjie Chen; Rong Su; Jun Cheng; Shusen Zheng; Lin Zhou
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  Alternative splicing and differential gene expression in colon cancer detected by a whole genome exon array.

Authors:  Paul J Gardina; Tyson A Clark; Brian Shimada; Michelle K Staples; Qing Yang; James Veitch; Anthony Schweitzer; Tarif Awad; Charles Sugnet; Suzanne Dee; Christopher Davies; Alan Williams; Yaron Turpaz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer microarray studies in conjunction with conserved cis-elements suggest patterns for coordinate regulation.

Authors:  David D Smith; Pål Saetrom; Ola Snøve; Cathryn Lundberg; Guillermo E Rivas; Carlotta Glackin; Garrett P Larson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  18 in total

1.  Differential expression of alternatively spliced transcripts related to energy metabolism in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anastasiya Vladimirovna Snezhkina; George Sergeevich Krasnov; Andrew Rostislavovich Zaretsky; Alex Zhavoronkov; Kirill Mikhailovich Nyushko; Alexey Alexandrovich Moskalev; Irina Yurievna Karpova; Anastasiya Isaevna Afremova; Anastasiya Valerievna Lipatova; Dmitriy Vladimitovich Kochetkov; Maria Sergeena Fedorova; Nadezhda Nikolaevna Volchenko; Asiya Fayazovna Sadritdinova; Nataliya Vladimirovna Melnikova; Dmitry Vladimirovich Sidorov; Anatoly Yurievich Popov; Dmitry Valerievich Kalinin; Andrey Dmitrievich Kaprin; Boris Yakovlevich Alekseev; Alexey Alexandrovich Dmitriev; Anna Viktorovna Kudryavtseva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  HMGA1P7-pseudogene regulates H19 and Igf2 expression by a competitive endogenous RNA mechanism.

Authors:  Marco De Martino; Floriana Forzati; Marianna Marfella; Simona Pellecchia; Claudio Arra; Luigi Terracciano; Alfredo Fusco; Francesco Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Gastric Cancer Associated Genes Identified by an Integrative Analysis of Gene Expression Data.

Authors:  Bing Jiang; Shuwen Li; Zhi Jiang; Ping Shao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A novel gene expression-based prognostic scoring system to predict survival in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Pin Wang; Yunshan Wang; Bo Hang; Xiaoping Zou; Jian-Hua Mao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 5.  The Biological Role of the Collagen Alpha-3 (VI) Chain and Its Cleaved C5 Domain Fragment Endotrophin in Cancer.

Authors:  Jingya Wang; Wensheng Pan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Identification of hub genes with prognostic values in gastric cancer by bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Ting Li; Xujie Gao; Lei Han; Jinpu Yu; Hui Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Omental Tissue-Mediated Tumorigenesis of Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastases.

Authors:  Olga Kersy; Shelly Loewenstein; Nir Lubezky; Osnat Sher; Natalie B Simon; Joseph M Klausner; Guy Lahat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomic Comparison of Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Tumors.

Authors:  John W Crabb; Bo Hu; John S Crabb; Pierre Triozzi; Yogen Saunthararajah; Raymond Tubbs; Arun D Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genome-wide association pathway analysis to identify candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathways associated with TP53 expression status in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiwen Liao; Long Yu; Xiaoguang Liu; Chuangye Han; Tingdong Yu; Wei Qin; Chengkun Yang; Guangzhi Zhu; Hao Su; Tao Peng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  The Extracellular Matrix: An Accomplice in Gastric Cancer Development and Progression.

Authors:  Ana Margarida Moreira; Joana Pereira; Soraia Melo; Maria Sofia Fernandes; Patrícia Carneiro; Raquel Seruca; Joana Figueiredo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.