| Literature DB >> 24765161 |
Liping Liu1, Ziwen Xiao1, Yanbing Xiao1, Zhibiao Wang2, Faqi Li2, Maoping Li1, Xiaoqiong Peng1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of an intravenously delivered nano-hydroxyapatite (Nano-HA) solution into a rabbit model (Oryctolagus cuniculus) to determine the potential enhancement of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver tissue. The present study clearly indicated that the intravenous delivery of large quantities of Nano-HA into the body of the rabbit model over relatively short periods of time may be absorbed by the hepatic reticuloendothelial system. Subsequent HIFU treatment for HCC, as well as intravenous Nano-HA, produced a rapid increase in temperature and an enlargement of the coagulated necrotic area during ablation in the in vivo and ex vivo environments. In addition, it was found that the therapeutic doses of Nano-HA produced mild and transient abnormalities in the normal renal function and hepatic enzymes during the first 24 h following administration. The results of the current study indicated that the combination of Nano-HA and HIFU may provide a safe and effective alternative to conventional surgical procedures.Entities:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; high-intensity focused ultrasound; nano-hydroxyapatite; rabbit model
Year: 2014 PMID: 24765161 PMCID: PMC3997670 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.1900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1Exposure methods of focal ultrasound to treat liver cancer in vivo.
Contents of certain nano-HA compounds and their stability.
| Nano-HA concentration (g/l) | Solvent concentration | Other content | Appearance | Stability (time of precipitation-conformation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.9% Saline | None | Bright and transparent liquid | >1 month |
| 20 | 0.9% Saline | None | Milk-white suspended liquid | 1 h |
| 20 | 0.3% CMC-Na | Distilled water | Milk-white suspended liquid | 12 h |
| 20 | 0.3% lecithin + 1% glycerol | Distilled water | Milk-white suspended liquid | 12 h |
| 20 | 0.3% lecithin + 0.3% CMC-Na | Distilled water | Milk-white suspended liquid | 12 h |
Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite; CMC-Na, sodium carboxyl methyl cellulose.
Mortality rates of rabbits with different toxicant dosage concentrations of Nano-HA.
| Dosage of Nano-HA (mg/kg) | n | Mortality in 24 h (n) | Mortality (%) | Survival time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Mean (min) | Range | ||||
| 300 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 2.1±0.3 | 1–3 min |
| 280 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 2.5±0.5 | 1–3 min |
| 260 | 5 | 5 | 100 | 5.2±1.3 | 2–8 min |
| 240 | 6 | 4 | 66.7 | 282±65.3 | 3 min–20 h |
| 220 | 6 | 3 | 50 | 402.7±51.6 | 3 min–20 h |
| 200 | 6 | 3 | 50 | 401.7±52.2 | 5 min–18 h |
| 180 | 8 | 3 | 37.5 | 6.7±3.6 | 3–12 min |
| 160 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 140 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 120 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite.
Influence of Nano-HA on liver function in the rabbit model.
| Group | TP (g/l) | ALB (g/l) | ALT (μl) | AST (μl) | ALP (μl) | GGT (μl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 59.67±11.34 | 32.00±2.37 | 63.67±13.16 | 61.17±26.03 | 119.00±30.98 | 5.17±1.63 |
| 15 min | 70.05±5.38 | 40.02±1.35 | 37.00±11.38 | 21.25±2.69 | 133.05±25.66 | 4.88±0.68 |
| 30 min | 61.06±12.46 | 38.11±1.56 | 55.01±13.64 | 29.08±5.48 | 140.08±33.86 | 5.95±1.23 |
| 1 h | 67.24±5.20 | 37.06±2.21 | 138.15±8.75 | 670.00±35.46 | 140.03±35.28 | 5.02±0.15 |
| 2 h | 66.37±7.40 | 36.34±9.50 | 184.00±18.76 | 1027.00±205.87 | 147.00±29.74 | 4.50±0.13 |
| 24 h | 54.67±0.57 | 33.67±1.53 | 120.67±83.05 | 163.00±20.25 | 163.33±65.03 | 5.00±3.00 |
| 3 days | 62.00±6.08 | 35.00±2.65 | 64.00±16.37 | 41.00±11.53 | 118.67±18.72 | 5.67±3.51 |
| 1 week | 53.50±2.65 | 30.50±2.08 | 55.75±15.82 | 27.75±3.30 | 88.25±22.38 | 5.00±1.41 |
| 2 weeks | 57.25±15.76 | 30.25±6.40 | 77.75±14.98 | 69.50±30.03 | 80.25±38.80 | 4.50±2.19 |
Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, glutamyl transpeptidase;
Influence of Nano-HA on renal function and serum electrolytes in the rabbit model.
| Group | BUN (mmol/l) | CRE (μmol/l) | LDH (μl) | CK (μl) | Mg (mmol/l) | Ca (mmol/l) | P (mmol/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.07±2.89 | 53.17±21.29 | 267.33±235.6 | 2291.03±1125.03 | 0.63±0.38 | 3.07±0.21 | 3.01±0.25 |
| 15 min | 8.05±1.25 | 101.00±23.55 | 217.05±56.87 | 1558.12±96.87 | 0.51±0.21 | 3.05±0.36 | 2.53±0.55 |
| 30 min | 8.70±1.13 | 112.02±12.48 | 189.00±32.65 | 1549.02±369.47 | 1.05±0.46 | 3.04±0.28 | 2.21±0.16 |
| 1 h | 7.10±2.31 | 112.05±15.69 | 1378.00±102.89 | 2526.05±561.30 | 1.43±0.16 | 2.75±0.19 | 3.95±0.12 |
| 2 h | 8.80±1.56 | 113.00±9.86 | 1474.21±68.77 | 3033.00±1234.26 | 1.25±0.32 | 2.87±0.31 | 4.34±0.58 |
| 24 h | 12.33±3.68 | 107.00±40.60 | 421.00±94.60 | 2907.00±251.05 | 0.76±0.20 | 2.58±0.23 | 2.66±0.40 |
| 3 days | 9.07±0.93 | 72.33±10.97 | 198.05±23.64 | 1582.67±427.68 | 0.73±0.22 | 2.84±0.14 | 2.76±0.13 |
| 1 week | 6.40±3.80 | 82.25±12.50 | 199.50±178.92 | 1300.25±724.05 | 0.58±0.12 | 2.92±0.29 | 2.05±0.22 |
| 2 weeks | 6.50±1.49 | 62.5±7.94 | 219.25±132.03 | 1851.26±1292.04 | 0.81±0.36 | 2.73±0.15 | 1.83±0.29 |
Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CRE, creatine; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CK, creatine kinase; Mg, magnesium; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus.
Figure 2Liver tissue gross anatomy and structures were not clearly altered following Nano-HA administration in a rabbit model observed by light microscopy. (A) Normal liver tissue. (B) Liver of rabbits 24 h following the Nano-HA intravenous injection. (C) Normal liver tissue. Lightly stained liver cells and a loose cytoplasm were identified (D) 24 h and (E) one week following the Nano-HA intravenous injection. (F) Liver tissue and cells were normal two weeks following Nano-HA intravenous injection (magnification, ×400). Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite.
Figure 3A large quantity of refracting crystal granules were detected by electron microscopy within the Kupffer cells ≥24 h following the nano-hydroxyapatite intravenous injection.
Enhancement of the in vivo HIFU ablation in a Nano-HA dose-dependent manner.
| Drug | Dosage | n | Temperature increase (°C) | Volume (mm3) | EEF (J/mm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saline | 2 ml/kg | 10 | 35.83±2.85 | 95.58±21.49 | 0.386±0.098 |
| Nano-HA | 50 mg/kg | 10 | 40.97±2.35 | 186.75±42.73 | 0.194±0.034 |
| Nano-HA | 100 mg/kg | 10 | 41.68±2.48 | 230.16±54.27 | 0.161±0.036 |
| Nano-HA | 150 mg/kg | 10 | 43.06±3.72 | 280.11±49.10 | 0.128±0.019 |
P<0.05 compared with the saline control HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound; Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite; EEF, energy efficiency factor.
Influence of the in vivo HIFU ablation volume using 50-mg/kg Nano-HA at different time intervals.
| Time following Nano-HA injection | n | Increased temperature (°C) | Volume (mm3) | EEF (J/mm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 35.69±2.82 | 95.58±21.49 | 0.39±0.09 |
| 30 min | 5 | 36.58±2.39 | 111.53±27.13 | 0.324±0.047 |
| 2 h | 5 | 38.95±3.65 | 137.24±40.29 | 0.265±0.067 |
| 24 h | 5 | 40.97±2.27 | 186.75±42.73 | 0.19±0.03 |
| 48 h | 5 | 41.40±2.86 | 201.39±51.26 | 0.182±0.035 |
| 72 h | 5 | 39.67±1.88 | 180.68±24.47 | 0.197±0.025 |
| 1 week | 5 | 38.93±2.28 | 165.99±20.92 | 0.215±0.027 |
| 2 weeks | 5 | 37.82±2.16 | 105.52±14.84 | 0.338±0.047 |
Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite; EEF, energy efficiency factor; HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Figure 4Different factors of the rabbits that were implanted with VX2 cancer in the liver, which was influenced by Nano-HA and Nano-HA ex vivo HIFU. Group A received no therapeutic administration, group B underwent in vivo HIFU irradiation and group C underwent a combination of Nano-HA and in vivo HIFU irradiation, (n=10). The longest diameters of the tumor and irradiated loci in the ultrasound images were observed in group C, followed by groups B and A at the same time-interval following the treatment intervention. (A) Ultrasound images of the tumor and irradiated loci of the rabbits that were implanted with VX2 cancer in the liver, which was influenced by Nano-HA in vivo HIFU. (B) Diameter of the tumor and irradiated loci of the rabbits that were implanted with VX2 cancer in the liver, which was influenced by Nano-HA ex vivo HIFU. (C) Survival time of the rabbits that were implanted with VX2 cancer in the liver, which was influenced by Nano-HA and/or ex vivo HIFU. Nano-HA, nano-hydroxyapatite; HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound.