Literature DB >> 24764874

N,N'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(methane-sulfon-amide).

Wesley Ting Kwok Chan1, Ka Yan Karen Kung2, Man-Kin Wong2.   

Abstract

The mol-ecular structure of the title compound, C4H12N2O4S2, has crystallographic inversion symmetry. The central N-C-C-N moiety was refined as disordered over two sets of sites with an approximate occupancy ratio of 3:1 [0.742 (15):0.258 (15). In the crystal, N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link adjacent mol-ecules into a thick sheet structure parallel to the b-axis direction.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24764874      PMCID: PMC3998313          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814000622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For analogous disulfonamide compounds, see: Al-Dajani et al. (2011a ▶,b ▶). For other analyses and properties of n class="Chemical">disulfonamide compounds, see: Alyar et al. (2011 ▶, 2012 ▶). For their biological and pharmaceutical activity, see: Sahu et al. (2007 ▶); Innocenti et al. (2008 ▶). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H12N2O4S2 M = 216.28 Monoclinic, a = 10.5668 (11) Å b = 5.6092 (6) Å c = 8.5141 (9) Å β = 109.790 (6)° V = 474.84 (9) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.54 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.30 × 0.28 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.854, T max = 0.948 10251 measured reflections 1115 independent reflections 1033 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.025

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.099 S = 1.10 1115 reflections 76 parameters 2 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814000622/nk2217sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814000622/nk2217Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814000622/nk2217Isup3.mol Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814000622/nk2217Isup4.cdx Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814000622/nk2217Isup5.cml CCDC reference: Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H12N2O4S2F(000) = 228
Mr = 216.28Dx = 1.513 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.5668 (11) ÅCell parameters from 5915 reflections
b = 5.6092 (6) Åθ = 2.7–27.7°
c = 8.5141 (9) ŵ = 0.54 mm1
β = 109.790 (6)°T = 296 K
V = 474.84 (9) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 20.30 × 0.28 × 0.10 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1033 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
phi and ω scansRint = 0.025
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)θmax = 27.7°, θmin = 2.1°
Tmin = 0.854, Tmax = 0.948h = −13→13
10251 measured reflectionsk = −7→7
1115 independent reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0579P)2 + 0.1493P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.099(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.31 e Å3
1115 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.32 e Å3
76 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
2 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.060 (8)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.A disorder of the N—C—C—N chain in the molecule is observed. The occupancies were allowed to be refined freely. SADI restrains were used on the bond lengths of the S-N bond and the N—C bond. Furthermore, the hard constrain RIGU was placed on the displacement parameters of C2'. ISOR did not significantly improve the refinement.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
S10.27263 (4)0.10237 (7)0.80849 (5)0.0399 (2)
O10.22112 (17)−0.0101 (3)0.92544 (17)0.0616 (4)
O20.34539 (14)0.3196 (2)0.85836 (18)0.0564 (4)
C10.3769 (2)−0.1041 (4)0.7557 (3)0.0599 (5)
H1A0.4547−0.13570.85190.090*
H1B0.4046−0.03970.66810.090*
H1C0.3282−0.24970.71840.090*
N10.1439 (6)0.1585 (10)0.6441 (5)0.0419 (11)0.742 (15)
H10.12180.30210.61060.050*0.742 (15)
C20.0667 (4)−0.0467 (5)0.5549 (6)0.0531 (12)0.742 (15)
H2A0.0546−0.16220.63340.064*0.742 (15)
H2B0.1134−0.12350.48820.064*0.742 (15)
N1'0.162 (2)0.170 (3)0.637 (2)0.063 (5)0.258 (15)
H1'0.17710.27720.57310.076*0.258 (15)
C2'0.0165 (18)0.026 (4)0.5855 (12)0.069 (5)0.258 (15)
H2'A0.0255−0.11920.65020.082*0.258 (15)
H2'B−0.05200.12550.60460.082*0.258 (15)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0482 (3)0.0379 (3)0.0328 (3)−0.00469 (15)0.01254 (19)−0.00383 (13)
O10.0881 (10)0.0592 (9)0.0456 (8)−0.0079 (8)0.0331 (7)0.0037 (6)
O20.0614 (8)0.0464 (8)0.0533 (8)−0.0136 (6)0.0088 (6)−0.0113 (6)
C10.0590 (12)0.0546 (12)0.0642 (13)0.0071 (9)0.0185 (10)−0.0093 (9)
N10.0397 (18)0.0455 (19)0.0334 (14)−0.0088 (13)0.0030 (11)0.0088 (13)
C20.0401 (18)0.0432 (13)0.063 (2)0.0043 (11)0.0005 (15)−0.0143 (12)
N1'0.043 (6)0.051 (7)0.090 (11)−0.003 (5)0.015 (5)−0.035 (7)
C2'0.064 (7)0.092 (11)0.051 (5)−0.034 (8)0.021 (5)−0.006 (5)
S1—O21.4267 (13)N1—H10.8600
S1—O11.4327 (14)C2—C2i1.498 (6)
S1—N1'1.574 (13)C2—H2A0.9700
S1—N11.619 (4)C2—H2B0.9700
S1—C11.758 (2)N1'—C2'1.66 (3)
C1—H1A0.9600N1'—H1'0.8600
C1—H1B0.9600C2'—C2'i1.41 (2)
C1—H1C0.9600C2'—H2'A0.9700
N1—C21.465 (6)C2'—H2'B0.9700
O2—S1—O1117.55 (9)S1—N1—H1121.5
O2—S1—N1'103.0 (7)N1—C2—C2i106.8 (3)
O1—S1—N1'114.5 (10)N1—C2—H2A110.4
O2—S1—N1107.6 (2)C2i—C2—H2A110.4
O1—S1—N1106.3 (2)N1—C2—H2B110.4
O2—S1—C1108.52 (10)C2i—C2—H2B110.4
O1—S1—C1107.80 (11)H2A—C2—H2B108.6
N1'—S1—C1104.7 (7)S1—N1'—C2'117.2 (14)
N1—S1—C1108.8 (2)S1—N1'—H1'121.4
S1—C1—H1A109.5C2'—N1'—H1'121.4
S1—C1—H1B109.5C2'i—C2'—N1'104.9 (14)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C2'i—C2'—H2'A110.8
S1—C1—H1C109.5N1'—C2'—H2'A110.8
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C2'i—C2'—H2'B110.8
H1B—C1—H1C109.5N1'—C2'—H2'B110.8
C2—N1—S1116.9 (3)H2'A—C2'—H2'B108.8
C2—N1—H1121.5
O2—S1—N1—C2170.3 (5)O2—S1—N1'—C2'−149.8 (15)
O1—S1—N1—C2−63.0 (6)O1—S1—N1'—C2'−21.0 (18)
N1'—S1—N1—C2113 (6)N1—S1—N1'—C2'−25 (5)
C1—S1—N1—C252.9 (6)C1—S1—N1'—C2'96.8 (17)
S1—N1—C2—C2i162.7 (5)S1—N1'—C2'—C2'i−138 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1ii0.862.463.009 (6)122
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1i 0.862.463.009 (6)122

Symmetry code: (i) .

  6 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Conformational analysis, vibrational and NMR spectroscopic study of the methanesulfonamide-N,N'-1,2-ethanediylbis.

Authors:  Hamit Alyar; Arslan Ünal; Neslihan Özbek; Saliha Alyar; Nurcan Karacan
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: thioxolone versus sulfonamides for obtaining isozyme-selective inhibitors?

Authors:  Alessio Innocenti; Alfonso Maresca; Andrea Scozzafava; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  N,N'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(4-chloro-benzene-sulfonamide).

Authors:  Mohammad T M Al-Dajani; Habibah A Wahab; Shaharum Shamsuddin; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-08-02

6.  N,N'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)dibenzene-sulfonamide.

Authors:  Mohammad T M Al-Dajani; Jamal Talaat; Nornisah Mohamed; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.