Literature DB >> 24764847

1,3,5-Tris(4-meth-oxy-phen-yl)-1,3,5-triazinane-2,4,6-trione.

Li Fang1, Feifei Li1, Xuemei Luo1.   

Abstract

The complete mol-ecule of the title compound, C24H21N3O6, is generated by the application of threefold rotation symmetry about an axis perpendicular to the central ring. The mol-ecule exhibits a propeller-like shape. The dihedral angle between each benzene ring and the heterocyclic ring is 74.0 (1)°. The mol-ecules pack with no specific inter-molecular inter-actions between them. The SQUEEZE procedure in PLATON [Spek (2009 ▶). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155] was used to model disordered solvent mol-ecules, presumed to be acetone; the calculated unit-cell data do not take into account the presence of these.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24764847      PMCID: PMC3998286          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681303482X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to trimerization of aromatic iso­cyanates, see: Raders & Verkade (2010 ▶); Duong et al. (2004 ▶); Tang et al. (1994 ▶); Zhitinkina et al. (1985 ▶); Nawata et al. (1975 ▶); Nicholas & Gmitter (1965 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C24H21N3O6 M = 447.44 Trigonal, a = 13.2008 (14) Å c = 26.695 (3) Å V = 4028.7 (8) Å3 Z = 6 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 200 K 0.51 × 0.49 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.960, T max = 0.997 6995 measured reflections 1577 independent reflections 1142 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.031

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044 wR(F 2) = 0.122 S = 1.05 1577 reflections 101 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.12 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681303482X/tk5284sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681303482X/tk5284Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681303482X/tk5284Isup3.cml CCDC reference: Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C24H21N3O6Dx = 1.107 Mg m3
Mr = 447.44Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Trigonal, R3cCell parameters from 1247 reflections
Hall symbol: R 3 -2"cθ = 2.3–20.4°
a = 13.2008 (14) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 26.695 (3) ÅT = 200 K
V = 4028.7 (8) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 60.51 × 0.49 × 0.04 mm
F(000) = 1404
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1577 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1142 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −9→15
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.997k = −15→14
6995 measured reflectionsl = −31→31
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.122H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0687P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1577 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
101 parametersΔρmax = 0.16 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.12 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.24317 (15)0.68853 (16)0.06336 (8)0.0507 (6)
O10.37628 (17)0.88360 (16)0.06161 (9)0.0710 (6)
O2−0.1275 (2)0.7774 (3)0.06263 (12)0.1146 (9)
C10.1470 (2)0.7108 (2)0.06541 (11)0.0552 (7)
C20.0864 (2)0.6942 (2)0.10907 (12)0.0652 (7)
H20.10900.67090.13870.078*
C3−0.0104 (3)0.7124 (3)0.10944 (13)0.0768 (9)
H3−0.05650.69700.13880.092*
C4−0.0369 (2)0.7525 (3)0.06691 (14)0.0724 (8)
C50.0253 (3)0.7708 (3)0.02514 (15)0.0878 (10)
H50.00500.7983−0.00390.105*
C60.1168 (3)0.7514 (3)0.02308 (12)0.0729 (8)
H60.16000.7654−0.00710.088*
C70.3566 (2)0.7838 (2)0.06225 (11)0.0566 (7)
C8−0.2060 (4)0.7446 (5)0.1028 (2)0.1312 (17)
H8A−0.24140.66040.10870.197*
H8B−0.26740.76310.09480.197*
H8C−0.16410.78740.13290.197*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0390 (12)0.0406 (12)0.0734 (15)0.0206 (10)0.0029 (11)0.0033 (11)
O10.0571 (12)0.0488 (12)0.1124 (15)0.0306 (10)−0.0006 (11)−0.0036 (10)
O20.0943 (19)0.158 (3)0.127 (2)0.0896 (19)0.0056 (17)0.0234 (18)
C10.0452 (16)0.0456 (15)0.0770 (18)0.0242 (14)0.0011 (15)−0.0026 (14)
C20.0608 (17)0.0636 (18)0.0762 (19)0.0350 (14)0.0076 (14)0.0051 (15)
C30.0591 (18)0.080 (2)0.089 (2)0.0331 (16)0.0207 (15)0.0075 (17)
C40.0538 (16)0.078 (2)0.098 (2)0.0429 (16)−0.0027 (18)0.0036 (17)
C50.071 (2)0.111 (3)0.093 (3)0.054 (2)−0.008 (2)0.0187 (19)
C60.0654 (19)0.079 (2)0.081 (2)0.0410 (16)0.0038 (16)0.0179 (16)
C70.0465 (16)0.0472 (16)0.0751 (19)0.0227 (11)0.0012 (14)−0.0021 (14)
C80.085 (3)0.174 (4)0.166 (4)0.088 (3)0.016 (3)−0.011 (4)
N1—C7i1.384 (3)C3—C41.370 (5)
N1—C71.393 (3)C3—H30.9500
N1—C11.440 (3)C4—C51.333 (4)
O1—C71.209 (3)C5—C61.356 (4)
O2—C41.395 (4)C5—H50.9500
O2—C81.400 (5)C6—H60.9500
C1—C21.368 (4)C7—N1ii1.384 (3)
C1—C61.392 (4)C8—H8A0.9800
C2—C31.413 (4)C8—H8B0.9800
C2—H20.9500C8—H8C0.9800
C7i—N1—C7124.2 (3)C4—C5—C6121.7 (3)
C7i—N1—C1117.35 (19)C4—C5—H5119.2
C7—N1—C1118.43 (19)C6—C5—H5119.2
C4—O2—C8117.0 (3)C5—C6—C1119.6 (3)
C2—C1—C6119.7 (2)C5—C6—H6120.2
C2—C1—N1120.3 (3)C1—C6—H6120.2
C6—C1—N1120.0 (2)O1—C7—N1ii122.2 (2)
C1—C2—C3119.1 (3)O1—C7—N1122.1 (2)
C1—C2—H2120.5N1ii—C7—N1115.7 (3)
C3—C2—H2120.5O2—C8—H8A109.5
C4—C3—C2119.1 (3)O2—C8—H8B109.5
C4—C3—H3120.4H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—H3120.4O2—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—C3120.7 (3)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—O2114.3 (3)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C3—C4—O2125.0 (3)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  An electron-rich proazaphosphatrane for isocyanate trimerization to isocyanurates.

Authors:  Steven M Raders; John G Verkade
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  N-heterocyclic carbenes as highly efficient catalysts for the cyclotrimerization of isocyanates.

Authors:  Hung A Duong; Michael J Cross; Janis Louie
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 6.005

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.