Literature DB >> 24764005

A diagnostic evaluation of modeled mercury wet depositions in Europe using atmospheric speciated high-resolution observations.

J Bieser1, F De Simone, C Gencarelli, B Geyer, I Hedgecock, V Matthias, O Travnikov, A Weigelt.   

Abstract

This study is part of the Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS), a European FP7 project dedicated to the improvement and validation of mercury models to assist in establishing a global monitoring network and to support political decisions. One key question about the global mercury cycle is the efficiency of its removal out of the atmosphere into other environmental compartments. So far, the evaluation of modeled wet deposition of mercury was difficult because of a lack of long-term measurements of oxidized and elemental mercury. The oxidized mercury species gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) and particle-bound mercury (PBM) which are found in the atmosphere in typical concentrations of a few to a few tens pg/m(3) are the relevant components for the wet deposition of mercury. In this study, the first European long-term dataset of speciated mercury taken at Waldhof/Germany was used to evaluate deposition fields modeled with the chemistry transport model (CTM) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and to analyze the influence of the governing parameters. The influence of the parameters precipitation and atmospheric concentration was evaluated using different input datasets for a variety of CMAQ simulations for the year 2009. It was found that on the basis of daily and weekly measurement data, the bias of modeled depositions could be explained by the bias of precipitation fields and atmospheric concentrations of GOM and PBM. A correction of the modeled wet deposition using observed daily precipitation increased the correlation, on average, from 0.17 to 0.78. An additional correction based on the daily average GOM and PBM concentration lead to a 50% decrease of the model error for all CMAQ scenarios. Monthly deposition measurements were found to have a too low temporal resolution to adequately analyze model deficiencies in wet deposition processes due to the nonlinear nature of the scavenging process. Moreover, the general overestimation of atmospheric GOM by the CTM in combination with an underestimation of low precipitation events in the meteorological models lead to a good agreement of total annual wet deposition besides the large error in weekly deposition estimates. Moreover, it was found that the current speciation profiles for GOM emissions are the main factor for the overestimation of atmospheric GOM concentrations and might need to be revised in the future. The assumption of zero emissions of GOM lead to an improvement of the mean normalized bias for three-hourly observations of atmospheric GOM from 9.7 to 0.5, Furthermore, the diurnal correlation between model and observation increased from 0.01 to 0.64. This is a strong indicator that GOM is not directly emitted from primary sources but is mainly created by oxidation of GEM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24764005     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-2863-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  8 in total

1.  Modeling mercury in power plant plumes.

Authors:  Kristen Lohman; Christian Seigneur; Eric Edgerton; John Jansen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Intercomparison study of atmospheric mercury models: 1. Comparison of models with short-term measurements.

Authors:  Alexey Ryaboshapko; O Russell Bullock; Jesper Christensen; Mark Cohen; Ashu Dastoor; Ilia Ilyin; Gerhard Petersen; Dimiter Syrakov; Richard S Artz; Didier Davignon; Roland R Draxler; John Munthe
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Intercomparison study of atmospheric mercury models: 2. Modelling results vs. long-term observations and comparison of country deposition budgets.

Authors:  Alexey Ryaboshapko; O Russell Bullock; Jesper Christensen; Mark Cohen; Ashu Dastoor; Ilia Ilyin; Gerhard Petersen; Dimiter Syrakov; Oleg Travnikov; Richard S Artz; Didier Davignon; Roland R Draxler; John Munthe; Jozef Pacyna
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Vertical emission profiles for Europe based on plume rise calculations.

Authors:  J Bieser; A Aulinger; V Matthias; M Quante; H A C Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Assessment of modeled mercury dry deposition over the Great Lakes region.

Authors:  L Zhang; P Blanchard; D Johnson; A Dastoor; A Ryzhkov; C J Lin; K Vijayaraghavan; D Gay; T M Holsen; J Huang; J A Graydon; V L St Louis; M S Castro; E K Miller; F Marsik; J Lu; L Poissant; M Pilote; K M Zhang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING REGIONAL-SCALE NUMERICAL PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING SYSTEMS.

Authors:  Robin Dennis; Tyler Fox; Montse Fuentes; Alice Gilliland; Steven Hanna; Christian Hogrefe; John Irwin; S Trivikrama Rao; Richard Scheffe; Kenneth Schere; Douw Steyn; Akula Venkatram
Journal:  Environ Fluid Mech (Dordr)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.551

7.  Global atmospheric cycle of mercury: a model study on the impact of oxidation mechanisms.

Authors:  F De Simone; C N Gencarelli; I M Hedgecock; N Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Variability of the gaseous elemental mercury sea-air flux of the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Joachim Kuss; Bernd Schneider
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Spatial distribution and temporal trends of mercury and arsenic in remote timberline coniferous forests, eastern of the Tibet Plateau, China.

Authors:  Ronggui Tang; Haiming Wang; Ji Luo; Shouqin Sun; Yiwen Gong; Jia She; Youchao Chen; Yang Dandan; Jun Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Air Contamination by Mercury, Emissions and Transformations-a Review.

Authors:  Barbara Gworek; Wojciech Dmuchowski; Aneta H Baczewska; Paulina Brągoszewska; Olga Bemowska-Kałabun; Justyna Wrzosek-Jakubowska
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Atmospheric particulate mercury at the urban and forest sites in central Poland.

Authors:  Patrycja Siudek; Marcin Frankowski; Jerzy Siepak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Particulate-phase mercury emissions from biomass burning and impact on resulting deposition: a modelling assessment.

Authors:  Francesco De Simone; Paulo Artaxo; Mariantonia Bencardino; Sergio Cinnirella; Francesco Carbone; Francesco D'Amore; Aurélien Dommergue; Xin Bin Feng; Christian N Gencarelli; Ian M Hedgecock; Matthew S Landis; Francesca Sprovieri; Noriuki Suzuki; Ingvar Wängberg; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.