Literature DB >> 24763713

Surgical treatment of primary gynecomastia in children and adolescents.

Sebastian Fischer1, Tobias Hirsch, Christoph Hirche, Jurij Kiefer, Maximilian Kueckelhaus, Günter Germann, Matthias A Reichenberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Idiopathic gynecomastia is a common diagnosis in children and adolescents. Though medical treatments reveal potentially harmful side effects, surgical interventions are performable in numerous techniques. In children and adolescents, only minimal evidence exists. This retrospective study presents our experiences with two common surgical techniques, namely subcutaneous mastectomy and combination with liposuction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients <18 years who underwent surgery due to idiopathic gynecomastia. Height, weight and grade of gynecomastia according to Simon's classification before surgery were reviewed in all patients' files. Additionally, duration of surgery, inpatient stay and postoperative complications were documented. Follow-up examinations were performed with assessment of scar formation, numbness and retraction of the nipple region. Furthermore, patients were asked to report on general satisfaction with surgery (satisfactory/not satisfactory) and esthetic outcome on a numeric scale (1 = good, 6 = bad).
RESULTS: 37 patients underwent surgery for verified idiopathic gynecomastia. Grade of gynecomastia was I° in 13.5% (n = 5), II° in 40.5% (n = 15) and III° in 46% (n = 17) of cases. Subcutaneous mastectomy was applied in 11 patients (group I, 30%) and both subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction in 26 patients (group II, 70.3%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients. Long-term follow-up was performed in 32 patients after a median of 34 months (range 6-96 months). Hypertrophic scar formation was seen in one patient (3%) and nipple retraction in two patients (5%). Recurrence of gynecomastia occurred in two patients (5%). Patient rating was satisfactory in 9% of cases and esthetic outcome was received with a median of 2.0 (1-5). In comparing both surgical techniques, combination of mastectomy and liposuction revealed better results in every measure except for surgical duration (median 73 vs. 90 min).
CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of gynecomastia remains a purely elective intervention. In contrast to adults, skin in children and adolescents provides high retractability. Therefore, open reduction combined with minimally invasive liposuction was proven useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763713     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-014-3508-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  35 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive surgical therapy of gynecomastia: liposuction and exeresis technique].

Authors:  M Voigt; K J Walgenbach; C Andree; H Bannasch; Z Looden; G B Stark
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Tamoxifen is unproved for gynaecomastia.

Authors:  Julie C Doughty; Christopher R Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

3.  Mastectomy for Gynecomastia Through a Semicircular Intra-areolar Incision.

Authors:  J P Webster
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1946-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Male chest correction. Pectoral implants and gynecomastia.

Authors:  A E Aiache
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia.

Authors:  B E Simon; S Hoffman; S Kahn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Surgical treatment of gynecomastia in the body builder.

Authors:  A E Aiache
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  A new cannula for suction removal of parenchymal tissue of gynecomastia.

Authors:  G J Rosenberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Psychosocial impact of adolescent gynecomastia: a prospective case-control study.

Authors:  Laura C Nuzzi; Felecia E Cerrato; Cameron R Erikson; Michelle L Webb; Heather Rosen; Erika M Walsh; Amy D DiVasta; Arin K Greene; Brian I Labow
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Treatment of adolescent gynecomastia.

Authors:  Carrie A Laituri; Carissa L Garey; Daniel J Ostlie; Shawn D St Peter; George K Gittes; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 10.  Management of gynaecomastia: an update.

Authors:  P Gikas; K Mokbel
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the Interdisciplinary Care of Children with Klinefelter Syndrome.

Authors:  Shanlee Davis; Susan Howell; Rebecca Wilson; Tanea Tanda; Judy Ross; Philip Zeitler; Nicole Tartaglia
Journal:  Adv Pediatr       Date:  2016-08

2.  The Satisfaction Rate among Patients and Surgeons after Periareolar Surgical Approach to Gynecomastia along with Liposuction.

Authors:  Ahmad Reza Taheri; Mohamad Reza Farahvash; Hamid Reza Fathi; Koorosh Ghanbarzadeh; Bijan Faridniya
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-09

3.  Successful Excision of Gynecomastia with Nipple Repositioning Technique Utilizing the Dermoglandular Flap.

Authors:  Sadrollah Motamed; Seyed Esmail Hassanpour; Seyed Mehdi Moosavizadeh; Ataollah Heidari; Abdoreza Rouientan; Mahmood Nazemian
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.