Literature DB >> 24762774

The undergraduate nursing student evaluation of clinical learning environment: an Italian survey.

Daniela Magnani, Rosaria Di Lorenzo, Alessia Bari, Samantha Pozzi, Cinzia Del Giovane, Paola Ferri1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing students have to deal with many different clinical and practical aspects of knowledge to become skilled professionals. Student perception may be considered an indicator of teaching quality, since positive perception of students is strictly related to their effective professional learning. The Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision plus Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale is considered the gold standard psychometric instrument to evaluate both the quality and the climate of clinical learning environment. AIMS: To evaluate the quality of nurse teaching by means of CLES+T scale and to highlight significant correlations between CLES+T scale and selected characteristics of both students and clinical environments.
METHODS: On 4 March 2013, a cross-sectional survey was conducted at University of Modena: CLES+T scale was administered during a plenary convocation to 242 nursing students who attended the second and third years of Nursing Degree. All 34 items of the scale were statistically analysed using the median test.
RESULTS: The median values were uniformly represented by "4" level (on the Likert scale). The final marks of clinical learning experience were the only variable statistically significantly related to the scale scores. The paediatrics and emergency areas obtained the highest scale scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The nursing student evaluations were uniformly positive and related to their positive final marks. A positive ward atmosphere was identified as especially important in this study. These data indicate that a non-hostile and hospitable environment can favour the best clinical learning. We conclude that CLES+T scale can be a useful instrument to explore the clinical climate in all hospital areas and to highlight critical clinical situations.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762774     DOI: 10.7429/pi.2014.671055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prof Inferm        ISSN: 0033-0205


  6 in total

1.  Emotional impact of clinical practice in Burns Unit among nursing students: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gloria Caminati; Lucia Cappelli; Paola Ferri; Giovanna Artioli; Milena Spadola; Milena Spadola; Moira Vecchiatini; Martina Melotto; Rosaria Di Lorenzo; Ivan Rubbi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Empathic attitudes among nursing students: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Paola Ferri; Sergio Rovesti; Nunzio Panzera; Luigi Marcheselli; Alessia Bari; Rosaria Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2017-07-18

3.  The efficacy of interprofessional simulation in improving collaborative attitude between nursing students and residents in medicine. A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Paola Ferri; Sergio Rovesti; Daniela Magnani; Alberto Barbieri; Annalisa Bargellini; Francesca Mongelli; Loris Bonetti; Annarita Vestri; Danilo Alunni Fegatelli; Rosaria Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-12-07

4.  Using preceptors to improve nursing students' clinical learning outcomes: A Malawian students' perspective.

Authors:  Ellemes Phuma-Ngaiyaye; Thokozani Bvumbwe; Mep Coretta Chipeta
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2017-03-06

5.  A randomized comparison trial of two and four-step approaches to teaching Cardio-Pulmonary Reanimation.

Authors:  Giorgio Lapucci; Barbara Bondi; Ivan Rubbi; Valeria Cremonini; Erica Moretti; Rosaria Di Lorenzo; Daniela Magnani; Paola Ferri
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-02-23

6.  Effectiveness of simulation-based interprofessional education for medical and nursing students in South Korea: a pre-post survey.

Authors:  Jihye Yu; Woosuck Lee; Miran Kim; Sangcheon Choi; Sungeun Lee; Soonsun Kim; Yunjung Jung; Dongwook Kwak; Hyunjoo Jung; Sukyung Lee; Yu-Jin Lee; Soo-Jin Hyun; Yun Kang; So Myeong Kim; Janghoon Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.