Literature DB >> 24762589

Clinical implications and prognostic value of single and combined biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma.

Mingzhu Li1, Lijun Zhao1, Danhua Shen1, Xiaoping Li1, Jianliu Wang1, Lihui Wei2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most common gynecological cancers and the incidence has been increasing. This study was to identify the relationship of estrogen receptor (ER), progestrone receptor (PR), P53 protein, Ki-67 and phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN) with endometrial carcinoma, the assessment of these biomarkers and their association with clinicopathological parameters was performed.
METHODS: A total of 198 cases of primary endometrial carcinoma were investigated for ER, PR, Ki-67, P53, and PTEN antigens by immunohistochemical methods. The association of these markers with age, menopause status, histological type, FIGO stage, grading, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement and serum tumor marker was examined.
RESULTS: The percentages of Ki-67- and P53-negative endometrial tumors were significantly higher in ER-positive compared with ER-negative tumors (both P = 0.000). The same trend was evident with PR status. The percentage of PTEN-positive tumors was significantly higher in PR-positive compared with PR-negative tumors (P = 0.021), but was no difference in tumors with different ER status. There was no clear association between PTEN positivity and clinicopathological parameters except more relevance with endometrioid histotype (P = 0.013). There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the different combined biological factors examined in disease-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: ER and PR status were significant predictors with staging, grading and recurrence. P53 and Ki-67 expression were inversely correlated with both ER and PR expression and have more aggressive clinicopathological features. PTEN expression was inversely correlated with PR expression but not with ER expression. The combined type of ER+PR+P53-PTEN+ was in the majority in endometrial cancer and seemed to be related to better clinical outcome. The combination of ER-PR-P53+PTEN- represented the worst disease-free survival and was strongly associated with poorest survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  5 in total

1.  Clinical Significance of Serum HE4, CA125, CA724, and CA19-9 in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Bian; Xiaoxu Sun; Bo Li; Liang Ming
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 2.  The significance of markers in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Monika M Żyła; Jacek R Wilczyński; Marta Kostrzewa; Kinga Księżakowska-Łakoma; Marek Nowak; Grzegorz Stachowiak; Krzysztof Szyłło; Tomasz Stetkiewicz
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2016-11-15

3.  Screening of prognostic biomarkers for endometrial carcinoma based on a ceRNA network.

Authors:  Ming-Jun Zheng; Rui Gou; Wen-Chao Zhang; Xin Nie; Jing Wang; Ling-Ling Gao; Juan-Juan Liu; Xiao Li; Bei Lin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  A New Risk Index Combining d-Dimer, Fibrinogen, HE4, and CA199 Differentiates Suspecting Endometrial Cancer From Patients With Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding or Discharge.

Authors:  Lili Ge; Guangquan Liu; Kai Hu; Ke Huang; Mi Zhang; Juan Zhou; Fang Teng; Jian Cao; Chencheng Dai; Xuemei Jia
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

5.  An immunohistochemical study on the expression of sex steroid receptors, Ki-67 and cytokeratins 7 and 20 in feline endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Ana Laura Saraiva; Rita Payan-Carreira; Fátima Gärtner; Marta R Fortuna da Cunha; Alexandra Rêma; Fátima Faria; Lígia M Lourenço; Maria Dos Anjos Pires
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.