Literature DB >> 24762544

Prevalence, morphology, and natural history of FGFR1-amplified lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, detected by FISH and SISH.

Prudence A Russell1, Yong Yu1, Richard J Young2, Matthew Conron3, Zoe Wainer4, Naveed Alam5, Benjamin Solomon6, Gavin M Wright5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a lung cancer patient cohort and to correlate results with morphology, silver in situ hybridization (SISH), and patient outcome. FGFR1 FISH and SISH were performed in 406 and 385 lung cancer cases, respectively, and the results were compared. High-level FGFR1 amplification was defined as the ratio of FGFR1/centromere 8 ≥2, or tumor cell percentage with ≥15 signals ≥10%, or average number of signals/tumor cell nucleus ≥6. Low-level amplification was defined as tumor cell percentage with ≥5 signals ≥50%. Of 406 tumors tested, there were 191 squamous cell carcinomas, 28 carcinomas with focal squamous morphology, 24 large cell carcinomas with squamous immunoprofile, 115 adenocarcinomas, 17 neuroendocrine tumors, and 31 carcinomas without squamous morphology or immunoprofile. FGFR1 FISH was assessable in 368 tumors, with FGFR1 amplification identified in 50, including 48 tumors with either squamous morphology or immunoprofile (48 of 225, 21.3%), and two 'marker-null' tumors without squamous or glandular morphology or immunoprofile (2 of 143, 1.4%; P<0.0001). FGFR1 SISH was assessable in 347 tumors. All 46 FGFR1 FISH-amplified tumors with tumor available for testing showed amplification with SISH, while all other tumors were negative. There was no relationship between FGFR1 amplification status and disease-free (P=0.88, HR=1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.67-1.60) or overall survival (P=0.97, HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.65-1.58) in surgically radically treated patients with tumors with any squamous morphology or immunoprofile. FGFR1 amplification is a common abnormality in tumors with any squamous morphology or immunoprofile, but it is also present in 'marker-null' tumors. The results of FGFR1 SISH showed 1:1 correlation with the results of FGFR1 FISH, indicating that SISH may be an alternative method to detect FGFR1 amplification. No relationship was detected between patient outcome and FGFR1 amplification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762544     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  10 in total

1.  Next-Generation Sequencing of Stage IV Squamous Cell Lung Cancers Reveals an Association of PI3K Aberrations and Evidence of Clonal Heterogeneity in Patients with Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Paul K Paik; Ronglai Shen; Helen Won; Natasha Rekhtman; Lu Wang; Camelia S Sima; Arshi Arora; Venkatraman Seshan; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger; Mark G Kris
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 2.  Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Family Members as Prognostic Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Norbertus A Ipenburg; Koos Koole; K Seng Liem; Pauline M W van Kempen; Ron Koole; Paul J van Diest; Robert J J van Es; Stefan M Willems
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Wen Gao; Jiali Xu; Xiaojun Chen; Yang Yang; Yizhi Zhu; Yongmei Yin; Renhua Guo; Ping Liu; Yongqian Shu; Lingxiang Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Gene Amplification in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Long Miao; Rui-Juan Liu; Jin-Hua Zhou; Shu-Hua Meng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 amplification in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jesus Monico; Brandon Miller; Luminita Rezeanu; Warren May; Donna C Sullivan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  FGFR1 and HER1 or HER2 co-amplification in breast cancer indicate poor prognosis.

Authors:  Shinan Chen; Yan Qiu; Peng Guo; Tianjie Pu; Ye Feng; Hong Bu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  The association between fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene amplification and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Long Miao; Jin-Hua Zhou; Jing-Jing Cai; Rui-Juan Liu
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  The clinical pathological characteristics and prognosis of FGFR1 gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fa-Jun Xie; Hong-Yang Lu; Qiu-Qing Zheng; Jing Qin; Yun Gao; Yi-Ping Zhang; Xun Hu; Wei-Min Mao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Prognostic implications of FGFR1 and MYC status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dohee Kwon; Ji Yun Yun; Bhumsuk Keam; Young Tae Kim; Yoon Kyung Jeon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene amplification and protein expression in human lung cancer.

Authors:  Omar Elakad; Anna-Maria Lois; Katja Schmitz; Sha Yao; Sara Hugo; Laura Lukat; Marc Hinterthaner; Bernhard C Danner; Alexander von Hammerstein-Equord; Kirsten Reuter-Jessen; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Philipp Ströbel; Hanibal Bohnenberger
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.