Literature DB >> 24762146

Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.

Simone Cerciello, Michele Vasso, Nicola Maffulli, Philippe Neyret, Katia Corona, Alfredo Schiavone Panni.   

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy may be indicated in the treatment of varus knee in young, active patients. The preservation of proprioception and native joint and biomechanics is crucial for functional recovery in these patients. However, deterioration of initial good results can occur with time. In such cases, revision with total knee arthroplasty is indicated. However, this is a more surgically demanding option compared with a primary prosthesis. Accurate preoperative planning is mandatory to decrease the risk of intraoperative complications. A precise surgical technique, which is crucial to improving functional outcomes, includes hardware removal, joint exposition, tibial deformities due to previous osteotomy, and managing soft tissue mismatches. Possible technical challenges and surgical solutions exist for each of these aspects. However, several studies report lower functional results compared with primary implants. Thus, patients should be informed before high tibial osteotomy about its failure rate, the difficult surgical aspects of an additional prosthesis, and less satisfactory clinical results. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762146     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20140225-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  8 in total

Review 1.  Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Jae Hwi Han; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Nikhl N Bhandare; Dong Won Suh; Jong Seong Lee; Yong Suk Chang; Ji Woong Yeom; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Preoperative latent medial laxity and correction angle are crucial factors for overcorrection in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Do Kyung Lee; Joon Ho Wang; Yougun Won; Young Ki Min; Sagar Jaiswal; Byung Hoon Lee; Jong-Yeup Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Posteromedially placed plates with anterior staple reinforcement are not successful in decreasing tibial slope in opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Chase S Dean; Jorge Chahla; Lauren M Matheny; Tyler R Cram; Samuel G Moulton; Grant J Dornan; Justin J Mitchell; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of the impact of closing wedge versus opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on proximal tibial deformity and subsequent revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umito Kuwashima; Yasutaka Tashiro; Ken Okazaki; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Koji Murakami; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Return to sport following distal femur osteotomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca Ciolli; Lorenzo Proietti; Michele Mercurio; Katia Corona; Giulio Maccauro; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Simone Cerciello
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-04-25

6.  High tibial osteotomy in obese patients: Is successful surgery enough for a good outcome?

Authors:  Ümit Tuhanioğlu; Hasan Ulaş Oğur; Fırat Seyfettinoğlu; Hakan Çiçek; Alper Gültekin
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 7.  Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty after Failed High Tibial Osteotomy.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Dae Kyung Bae; Kang Il Kim; Chung Hwan Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Total knee arthroplasty conversion after a failed lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with knee hyperextension and secondary ankle degeneration: A case report.

Authors:  Chen Yao; Xingquan Xu; Sheng Zhou; Xiaoxiao Song; Dongquan Shi; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.