| Literature DB >> 24762138 |
Ibrahim A Adam, Mohamed A Abdalla, Mohamed E H Mohamed, Imadeldin E Aradaib1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bluetongue virus causes febrile disease in sheep and a fatal hemorrhagic infection in North American White-tailed deer. However, in cattle the disease is typically asymptomatic and no clinical overt disease is associated with bluetongue infection. Bluetongue virus activity has been detected in Khartoum, Sennar and South Darfur states of the Sudan. Currently, no information is available in regard to previous exposure of livestock to Bluetongue virus in North Kordufan State, the largest livestock producing region in the country. The present study was conducted to determine the prevalence of bluetongue antibodies and to identify the potential risk factors associated with the presence of bluetongue antibodies among cattle in North Kordufan State, Sudan. A total of 299 bovine blood samples were collected randomly from six localities in North Kordufan State and were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of BTV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24762138 PMCID: PMC4022533 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-94
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Figure 1Map of different localities in North Kordufan State, Sudan.
Univariate analysis for the association between BTV infection and the potential risk factors
| Locality | | | 5 | 4.181 | 0.524 |
| Abuzabad | 57 | 14(24.6%) | | | |
| Um Ruwaba | 58 | 9(15.5%) | | | |
| Bara | 36 | 7(19.4%) | | | |
| Shiekan | 60 | 9(15%) | | | |
| Ennuhud | 40 | 11(27.5%) | | | |
| Elkhuwaye | 48 | 8(16.7%) | | | |
| Age | | | 1 | 13.03 | 0.001 |
| Young | 119 | 11(9.2%) | | | |
| Old | 180 | 47(26.1%) | | | |
| Sex | | | 1 | 1.99 | 0.159 |
| female | 262 | 54(20.6%) | | | |
| male | 54 | 4(10.8%) | | | |
| Breed | | | 1 | 0.399 | 0.368 |
| Indigenous | 272 | 54(19.9%) | | | |
| Cross | 27 | 4(14.8%) | | | |
| Body condition | | | 1 | 5.491 | 0.012 |
| Bad | 234 | 52(22.2%) | | | |
| Good | 65 | 6(9.2%) | | | |
| Animal source | | | 2 | 0.165 | 0.921 |
| -Raised on farm | 213 | 41(19.2%) | | | |
| Purchased from other farm | 8 | 2(2.5%) | | | |
| purchased from local market | 78 | 15(19.2%) | | | |
| Grazing system | | | 2 | 1.097 | 0.578 |
| Stationary | 73 | 15(20.5%) | | | |
| Nomadic | 50 | 12(24%) | | | |
| Semi nomadic | 176 | 31(17.6%) | | | |
| Herd size | | | 2 | 1.321 | 0.517 |
| Small | 66 | 16(24.2%) | | | |
| Medium | 98 | 17(17.3%) | | | |
| Large | 135 | 25(18.5%) | | | |
| Vector control | | | 1 | 18.506 | 0.001 |
| No | 167 | 47(28.1%) | | | |
| Yes | 132 | 11(8.3%) | | | |
| Other animal | | | 1 | 0.189 | 0.387 |
| No | 152 | 28(18.4%) | | | |
| Yes | 147 | 30(20.4%) | | | |
| Farm yard | | | 1 | 0.259 | 0.358 |
| Outside | 115 | 24(20.9%) | | | |
| Indoor | 184 | 34(18.5%) | | | |
| Milk production | | | 2 | 0.680 | 0.712 |
| No | 159 | 33(20.8%) | | | |
| Low | 131 | 24(18.3%) | | | |
| High | 9 | 1(11.1%) |
Multivariate model using logistic regression analysis for the association between the potential risk factors and BTV seropositive cattle in North Kordufan State, Sudan
| Ref | | | |
| Young | 4.30 | 1.94-9.57 | 0.01* |
| Old | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Yes | 7.41 | 3.11-17.64 | 0.01* |
| No | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Emaciated | 2.95 | 1.15-7.60 | 0.03* |
| Fat | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Abuzabad | 0.06 | 0.06-1.28 | 0.74 |
| Umrawaba | 2.09 | 0.29-40.64 | 0.46 |
| Bara | 0.08 | 0.01-2.47 | 0.15 |
| Sheikan | 0.24 | 0.01-4.44 | 0.33 |
| Ennuhud | 0.77 | 0.08-7.45 | 0.82 |
| Elkhuwaye | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Female | 0.38 | 0.11-1.24 | 0.11 |
| Male | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Indigenous | 0.96 | 0.06-50.95 | 0.98 |
| Cross | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Purchase from local market | 1.37 | 0.44-4.23 | 0.59 |
| Raised on farm | 0.86 | 0.08-9.27 | 0.90 |
| Purchase from other farm | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Stationary | 1.91 | 0.20-17.83 | 0.57 |
| Nomadic | 0.69 | 0.07-6.78 | 0.75 |
| Semi nomadic | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Small | 2.79 | 0.61-12.86 | 0.19 |
| Large | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| Indoor | 2.79 | 0.62-14.28 | 0.17 |
| Outdoor | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| No | 0.63 | 0.32-1.24 | 0.18 |
| Low | 0.15 | 0.01-1.89 | 0.14 |
| High | | | |
| Ref | | | |
| No | 1.20 | 0.45-3.20 | 0.73 |
| Yes |
p-value* <0.05 was considered significant.