Literature DB >> 24761795

Reconsidering the safety in numbers effect for vulnerable road users: an application of agent-based modeling.

Jason Thompson1, Giovanni Savino, Mark Stevenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Increasing levels of active transport provide benefits in relation to chronic disease and emissions reduction but may be associated with an increased risk of road trauma. The safety in numbers (SiN) effect is often regarded as a solution to this issue; however, the mechanisms underlying its influence are largely unknown. We aimed to (1) replicate the SiN effect within a simple, simulated environment and (2) vary bicycle density within the environment to better understand the circumstances under which SiN applies.
METHODS: Using an agent-based modeling approach, we constructed a virtual transport system that increased the number of bicycles from 9% to 35% of total vehicles over a period of 1,000 time units while holding the number of cars in the system constant. We then repeated this experiment under conditions of progressively decreasing bicycle density.
RESULTS: We demonstrated that the SiN effect can be reproduced in a virtual environment, closely approximating the exponential relationships between cycling numbers and the relative risk of collision as shown in observational studies. The association, however, was highly contingent upon bicycle density. The relative risk of collisions between cars and bicycles with increasing bicycle numbers showed an association that is progressively linear at decreasing levels of density.
CONCLUSIONS: Agent-based modeling may provide a useful tool for understanding the mechanisms underpinning the relationships previously observed between volume and risk under the assumptions of SiN. The SiN effect may apply only under circumstances in which bicycle density also increases over time. Additional mechanisms underpinning the SiN effect, independent of behavioral adjustment by drivers, are explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accident; agent-based modeling; cycling; density; risk; safety in numbers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24761795     DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2014.914626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev        ISSN: 1538-9588            Impact factor:   1.491


  6 in total

Review 1.  Integrating complex systems science into road safety research and practice, part 1: review of formative concepts.

Authors:  Rebecca B Naumann; Jill Kuhlberg; Laura Sandt; Stephen Heiny; Yorghos Apostolopoulos; Stephen W Marshall; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 2.  The unknown denominator problem in population studies of disease frequency.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Andrew G Rundle; Charles C Branas; Stanford Chihuri; Christina Mehranbod; Guohua Li
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-18

3.  Systems thinking in the context of road safety: Can systems tools help us realize a true "Safe Systems" approach?

Authors:  Rebecca B Naumann; Laura Sandt; Wesley Kumfer; Seth LaJeunesse; Stephen Heiny; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2020

4.  Flash Expansion Threshold in Whirligig Swarms.

Authors:  William L Romey; Alicia R Lamb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Contextualising Safety in Numbers: a longitudinal investigation into change in cycling safety in Britain, 1991-2001 and 2001-2011.

Authors:  Rachel Aldred; Rahul Goel; James Woodcock; Anna Goodman
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 6.  Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities.

Authors:  Mark Stevenson; Jason Thompson; Thiago Hérick de Sá; Reid Ewing; Dinesh Mohan; Rod McClure; Ian Roberts; Geetam Tiwari; Billie Giles-Corti; Xiaoduan Sun; Mark Wallace; James Woodcock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.