Literature DB >> 24760821

Revised evidence for statistical standards.

Andrew Gelman1, Christian P Robert2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760821      PMCID: PMC4024860          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322995111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Revised standards for statistical evidence.

Authors:  Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence.

Authors:  Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research.

Authors:  Valentin Amrhein; Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt; Tobias Roth
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  Ten Important Considerations for Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Not Normal: the uncertainties of scientific measurements.

Authors:  David C Bailey
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  A decision-theoretic approach to Bayesian clinical trial design and evaluation of robustness to prior-data conflict.

Authors:  Silvia Calderazzo; Manuel Wiesenfarth; Annette Kopp-Schneider
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.