Literature DB >> 24760737

The dependence of computed tomography number to relative electron density conversion on phantom geometry and its impact on planned dose.

Emma K Inness1, Vaughan Moutrie, Paul H Charles.   

Abstract

A computed tomography number to relative electron density (CT-RED) calibration is performed when commissioning a radiotherapy CT scanner by imaging a calibration phantom with inserts of specified RED and recording the CT number displayed. In this work, CT-RED calibrations were generated using several commercially available phantoms to observe the effect of phantom geometry on conversion to electron density and, ultimately, the dose calculation in a treatment planning system. Using an anthropomorphic phantom as a gold standard, the CT number of a material was found to depend strongly on the amount and type of scattering material surrounding the volume of interest, with the largest variation observed for the highest density material tested, cortical bone. Cortical bone gave a maximum CT number difference of 1,110 when a cylindrical insert of diameter 28 mm scanned free in air was compared to that in the form of a 30 × 30 cm(2) slab. The effect of using each CT-RED calibration on planned dose to a patient was quantified using a commercially available treatment planning system. When all calibrations were compared to the anthropomorphic calibration, the largest percentage dose difference was 4.2 % which occurred when the CT-RED calibration curve was acquired with heterogeneity inserts removed from the phantom and scanned free in air. The maximum dose difference observed between two dedicated CT-RED phantoms was ±2.1 %. A phantom that is to be used for CT-RED calibrations must have sufficient water equivalent scattering material surrounding the heterogeneous objects that are to be used for calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760737     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-014-0272-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  2 in total

1.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation dosimetry changes in radiotherapy treatment plans for adult patients arising from the selection of the CT image reconstruction kernel.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Sarah Muscat; Antony L Palmer; David Buckle; James Earley; Matthew G J Williams; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-07-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.