Literature DB >> 24760419

Robot-assisted level II-IV neck dissection through a modified facelift incision: initial North American experience.

W Greer Albergotti1, J Kenneth Byrd, John R De Almeida, Seungwon Kim, Umamaheswar Duvvuri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cosmesis is of increasing importance to the otolaryngology patient population. This is the first report of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection by North American groups.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study. Cases included three patients who underwent isolated, ipsilateral robot-assisted neck dissection. Operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node retrieval, total drainage, hospital stay and complications from this group were compared against the outcomes of six consecutive patients who underwent conventional neck dissection.
RESULTS: Operative times were longer in robot-assisted neck dissection (mean 234 min) compared with the conventional neck dissection (mean 110 min). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted selective neck dissection of levels II-IV is feasible through a modified facelift incision. Our initial data suggest that this procedure is surgically sound. It should be applied by experienced surgeons who wish to avoid a cervical incision.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; head and neck surgery; robotic neck dissection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760419     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  6 in total

1.  Retroauricular endoscopic and robotic versus conventional neck dissection for oral cancer.

Authors:  Renan Bezerra Lira; Thiago Celestino Chulam; Genival Barbosa de Carvalho; Willem Hans Schreuder; Yoon Woo Koh; Eun Chang Choi; Luiz Paulo Kowalski
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-05-04

2.  Variations and results of retroauricular robotic thyroid surgery associated or not with neck dissection.

Authors:  Renan Bezerra Lira; Thiago Celestino Chulam; Luiz Paulo Kowalski
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  Robotic surgical systems in maxillofacial surgery: a review.

Authors:  Hang-Hang Liu; Long-Jiang Li; Bin Shi; Chun-Wei Xu; En Luo
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.344

4.  Robot-assisted submandibular gland excision via modified facelift incision.

Authors:  Seung Wook Jung; Young Kwan Kim; Yong Hoon Cha; Yoon Woo Koh; Woong Nam
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience.

Authors:  Salvatore Poma; Domenico Michele Modica; Alessandro Pitruzzella; Alberto Fucarino; Gianfranco Mattina; Salvatore Fasola; Daniele Pirrello; Giuseppe Mario Galfano
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-29

6.  Retroauricular Endoscope-Assisted Approach to the Neck: Early Experience in Latin America.

Authors:  Renan Bezerra Lira; Thiago Celestino Chulam; Yoon Woo Woo Koh; Eun Chang Chang Choi; Luiz Paulo Kowalski
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.