| Literature DB >> 24760390 |
Zhou Fang1, Ana M Gonzales2, Michael T Clegg3, Kevin P Smith2, Gary J Muehlbauer1, Brian J Steffenson4, Peter L Morrell5.
Abstract
Genetic differentiation in natural populations is driven by geographic distance and by ecological or physical features within and between natural habitats that reduce migration. The primary population structure in wild barley differentiates populations east and west of the Zagros Mountains. Genetic differentiation between eastern and western populations is uneven across the genome and is greatest on linkage groups 2H and 5H. Genetic markers in these two regions demonstrate the largest difference in frequency between the primary populations and have the highest informativeness for assignment to each population. Previous cytological and genetic studies suggest there are chromosomal structural rearrangements (inversions or translocations) in these genomic regions. Environmental association analyses identified an association with both temperature and precipitation variables on 2H and with precipitation variables on 5H.Entities:
Keywords: chromosome structural variation; environmental association; local adaptation; population structure; wild barley
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24760390 PMCID: PMC4455769 DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.010561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1(A) Population structure in wild barley. Each of the six colors represents one of six subpopulations. There are three subpopulations nested within both the Eastern and Western populations. (B) Procrustes-transformed PCA plot of genetic variation in wild barley.
Hierarchical F-statistics comparing different levels of the hierarchical population structure
| Population | Subpopulation | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 0.042 | 0.191 |
| Population | 0.000 | 0.155 |
The values reported include the F statistics for two primary populations vs. total, six subpopulations vs. two primary populations, and six subpopulations vs. total.
Figure 2(A) FST between the Eastern and Western wild barley populations. (B) Pairwise FST based on all six subpopulations. The dotted line is the 95th percentile of FST genome-wide. (C) Bayes factors for correlation between allele frequencies and PC1. (D) Bayes factors for correlation between allele frequencies and PC2. (E) SPA score genome-wide from spatial analysis. The 95th percentile of the distribution of Bayes factors or SPA scores is indicated by a horizontal dashed line.
Diversity summary statistics for the two populations and six subpopulations
| Population | Size | # Segregating Sites | # Private SNPs | Percent Pairwise Difference (SD) | Microsatellite Expected Heterozygosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 2196 | 86 | 0.20 (0.04) | 0.740 | |
| Caspian Sea | 7 | 1146 | 2 | 0.10 (0.02) | 0.672 |
| Central Asia | 53 | 2027 | 22 | 0.19 (0.04) | 0.734 |
| Northern Mesopotamia | 41 | 1975 | 13 | 0.17 (0.03) | 0.717 |
| 183 | 2285 | 430 | 0.23 (0.03) | 0.742 | |
| Northern Levant | 42 | 2033 | 19 | 0.21 (0.02) | 0.740 |
| Southern Levant | 107 | 2197 | 49 | 0.22 (0.02) | 0.736 |
| Syrian Desert | 34 | 1916 | 6 | 0.16 (0.03) | 0.722 |
Data include the sample size, number of segregating sites, number of private SNPs, percent pairwise difference with SD, and microsatellite expected heterozygosity .
Figure 3Diagram of haplotype diversity in the two putative chromosome structural rearrangements on 2H and 5H. Haplotypes are divided into the two primary populations identified by genetic assignment. Each SNP is represented by either the ancestral state (black) or the derived state (gray). The frequencies of each of the haplotypes from the Eastern population (top) and from the Western population (bottom) are shown on the right. FSTs for each SNP between these two populations are shown at the top of the haplotype diagram.