Literature DB >> 24760011

In vivo substrates of the lens molecular chaperones αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin.

Usha P Andley1, James P Malone2, R Reid Townsend3.   

Abstract

αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin are members of the small heat shock protein family and function as molecular chaperones and major lens structural proteins. Although numerous studies have examined their chaperone-like activities in vitro, little is known about the proteins they protect in vivo. To elucidate the relationships between chaperone function, substrate binding, and human cataract formation, we used proteomic and mass spectrometric methods to analyze the effect of mutations associated with hereditary human cataract formation on protein abundance in αA-R49C and αB-R120G knock-in mutant lenses. Compared with age-matched wild type lenses, 2-day-old αA-R49C heterozygous lenses demonstrated the following: increased crosslinking (15-fold) and degradation (2.6-fold) of αA-crystallin; increased association between αA-crystallin and filensin, actin, or creatine kinase B; increased acidification of βB1-crystallin; increased levels of grifin; and an association between βA3/A1-crystallin and αA-crystallin. Homozygous αA-R49C mutant lenses exhibited increased associations between αA-crystallin and βB3-, βA4-, βA2-crystallins, and grifin, whereas levels of βB1-crystallin, gelsolin, and calpain 3 decreased. The amount of degraded glutamate dehydrogenase, α-enolase, and cytochrome c increased more than 50-fold in homozygous αA-R49C mutant lenses. In αB-R120G mouse lenses, our analyses identified decreased abundance of phosphoglycerate mutase, several β- and γ-crystallins, and degradation of αA- and αB-crystallin early in cataract development. Changes in the abundance of hemoglobin and histones with the loss of normal α-crystallin chaperone function suggest that these proteins also play important roles in the biochemical mechanisms of hereditary cataracts. Together, these studies offer a novel insight into the putative in vivo substrates of αA- and αB-crystallin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760011      PMCID: PMC3997384          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

α-crystallins are major proteins of lens fiber cells that comprise approximately 35% of the water-soluble lens protein and are essential for lens transparency. Mutations in α-crystallin genes are known to cause hereditary cataracts in humans. However, the cellular functions of α-crystallin in maintaining growth, development, and transparency of the lens and the mechanisms by which loss of α-crystallin function leads to cataracts are not fully understood. The vertebrate lens expresses two α-crystallin proteins, αA and αB, at a high concentration in lens fiber cells and at lower levels in the lens epithelium [1]–[4]. Transcription of αA and αB-crystallin genes commences early in lens development, beginning at embryonic day 10.5 and 9.5 respectively in the mouse, and continues as the lens matures [5]. In lens fiber cells, α-crystallins form heteroaggregates of αA- and αB-crystallins in a 3∶1 ratio [6]. αA- and αB-crystallins are members of the small heat shock protein family of molecular chaperones [7]. Homo-oligomers of αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin and the α-crystallin heteroaggregates possess chaperone-like activity, binding to partially unfolded or denatured proteins to suppress non-specific aggregation [7]. The molecular mechanisms by which point mutations in crystallin genes lead to hereditary human cataract formation are not completely understood [8]–[11]. Mouse models carrying naturally occurring α-crystallin mutations have provided valuable information on the functions of these mutant proteins in vivo [12]–[14]. The R49C mutation in αA-crystallin was found to be associated with nuclear cataract in four generations of a Caucasian family [15]. The mutant protein is mislocalized to the nucleus, and has reduced solubility [15], [16]. Most notably, this mutation is in the N-terminal region of αA-crystallin, a region thought to be important for aggregation interactions [16]. In mice, the R49C mutant produces a small eye/lens phenotype and severe cataracts at birth in 100% of mice homozygous for the mutation, indicating a gain in toxic function of αA-crystallin protein. Compared with homozygous mice, heterozygous αA-R49C knock-in mice, which mimic human cataract patients, develop cataracts at approximately 2 months of age and exhibit decreased protein solubility and altered cell signaling. Moreover, the R49C mutation significantly alters interactions between αA-crystallin, αB-crystallin, βB2-crystallin, γ-crystallins, and the cytoskeletal protein tubulin. The αB-R120G mutation in αB-crystallin also causes cataracts in humans [8]. αB-R120G knock-in mice have lens opacities, which are evident even in 3-week-old animals [17]. We found that 100% of heterozygous mice ranging in age from 3 weeks to 5 months had lens opacities, with severity increasing with age. Homozygous mice also developed lens opacities, but the effect did not appear to be dependent on mutant gene dosage. Our novel studies using knock-in mouse models for these mutations have shown profound effects on the lens and eye and indicate that α-crystallins affect lens epithelial and fiber cell growth and survival, in addition to their well-known role in transparency and optical properties of the lens. Moreover, our data suggest that αA- and αB-crystallin mutations alter the structure and function of lens epithelial and fiber cells and exert toxic effects at an early stage of development, when primary fiber cell differentiation commences. It is well established that abnormal interactions between chaperone and substrate proteins can result in increased protein aggregation and disease [8], [18]. The substrate-chaperone interaction between αB-crystallin and its substrates involves multiple interactive domains that have been extensively characterized [19], [20]. However, the in vivo substrates of αA- and αB-crystallin in the lens have not been identified. In the absence or reduction of α-crystallin chaperone function, it is likely that partially unfolded proteins will accumulate and aggregate [21], [22]. We therefore focused on determining which proteins are associated with α-crystallin chaperones with the aim of identifying proteins that are dependent on the chaperone activity of αA- and αB-crystallins to retain their native conformations in vivo. To achieve this, we analyzed the abundance of proteins in αA-R49C and αB-R120G knock-in mutant mice lenses by proteomics and mass spectrometry. We have already applied this approach to identify several proteins and enzymes not previously known to be affected by αA- or αB-crystallin loss of function [23]. This method has also been used to identify the effect of loss of function of the heat shock chaperone protein HSP90 [24].

Results

Two-day-old αA-R49C Mouse Lenses

To identify proteins that showed altered abundance in mouse lenses with the R49C αA-crystallin mutation, we performed 2D-DIGE of 2-day-old WT, αA-R49C heterozygous mutant, and αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses. Figure 1 and Fig. S1 in File S1 show 2D gels of proteins and Table 1 lists the approximately 100 protein spots that showed a change in abundance between these samples. Figure 2 shows the 3D plots for some of the spots that changed in abundance in these lenses. Compared with WT, αA-R49C heterozygous lenses had a 15-fold higher abundance of crosslinked αA-crystallin, a 3-fold higher abundance of more acidic αA-crystallin, and a 2.6-fold higher abundance of degraded αA-crystallin. The association of αA-crystallin with filensin increased 17-fold, the association of αA-crystallin with actin and creatine kinase B increased 15-fold, and the amount of actin alone increased 10.79-fold. The amount of a more acidic form of βB1-crystallin increased, whereas that of a basic form of βB1-crystallin decreased. αA-crystallin associated with βA3/A1 was more acidic and had a slightly lower apparent molecular weight than free αA-crystallin. The number of protein spots with altered abundance was much greater in the αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses than in the heterozygous lenses. In the homozygous lenses, several proteins in the high molecular weight region (>75 kDa) were altered. A high-molecular weight crosslinked αA-crystallin associated with creatine kinase B, actin, and erlin was enhanced 15-fold. The association of αA-crystallin with α-enolase and βA3/A1 was also enhanced in homozygous lenses. In the same lenses, the amount of βB1-crystallin decreased and more acidic forms of βB1- and βB3-crystallins were associated with αA-crystallin. Among proteins in the 20-kDa region (Table 1, Fig. 1 and Fig. S1 in File S1), the amount of αA-crystallin and βA3/A1-crystallin decreased in homozygous lenses. Among the cytoskeletal proteins, the levels of more basic forms of filensin and phakinin decreased, whereas levels of more acidic forms of these proteins increased. High molecular weight forms of phakinin and actin decreased 2.9-fold in homozygous lenses. The amount of tubulin, vimentin, and microtubule associated protein RP/EB associated with αA-crystallin increased in homozygous lenses, while that of phosphoglycerate mutase decreased. The amount of hemoglobin subunit 1 complexed with γD-, αB-, γS-, γB-, βB3-, and γA-crystallins decreased in homozygous lenses and increased with age. The abundance of forms of Hsp71 increased 2.5-fold, and the amount of αA-crystallin associated with vimentin, tubulin, and T-complex protein increased 4-fold in homozygous lenses. The amount of grifin associated with αA-crystallin increased in several spots.
Figure 1

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 2-day-old mice with knock-in of the αA-R49C mutation.

(A) 2D gel of cyanine dye-labeled lens proteins derived from wild-type sample 1 (WT1) proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αA-R49C heterozygous proteins labeled with Cy5. (B) 2D gel of cyanine dye-labeled lens proteins derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αA-R49C homozygous proteins labeled with Cy5. Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gels shown in (A) and (B) are shown in Fig. S1 in File S1 and were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins are listed in Table 1. Arrows indicate the shift in position of the αA-crystallin bands (red) to a more acidic pI with the mutation.

Table 1

Single-gel analysis of proteins that showed differences in abundance between 2-day-old WT and heterozygous or homozygous αA-R49C lenses.

Spot numberProteinUNIPROT accession numberMW (kDa)Number of assigned spectraFold change
WT1 vs. WT2WT1 vs. heterozygousWT2 vs. heterozygous
3040serum albuminP0772469393.6717.5716.1
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
FilensinA2AMT1743
4024αA-crystallinQ569M720111.4816.8914.83
Actin cytoplasmicP62737425
Creatine kinase BQ04447434
Erlin-2Q8BFZ9383
4090αA-crystallinQ569M720161.4515.5611.46
Actin cytoplasmicP62737425
Creatine kinase BQ04447433
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6251
4166αA-crystallinQ569M7201 (99%)1.3915.0910.67
4893Actin cytoplasmicP627374211.3910.798.77
Citron Rho-interacting kinaseP490252351
14-3-3 protein sigmaO70456281
Peroxiredoxin-2Q61171221
Glyoxalase domain-containing protein 4Q9CPV4201
5616αA-crystallinQ569M720211.247.517.46
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62517
βA2-crystallinQ9QXC6223
βA4-crystallinQ3TSJ3242
5816αA-crystallinQ569M720191.226.26.91
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6255
γA-crystallinQ6PGI0213
γD-crystallinP04345212
5909αA-crystallinQ569M720111.1766.83
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6253
γA-crystallinP04345212
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0212
γB-crystallinP04344212
Eukaryotic trans initiation factorP63242171
5955αA-crystallinQ569M720121.125.414.76
γA-crystallinP04345212
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0211
5976αA-crystallinQ569M720171.084.894.57
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
γA-crystallinP04345212
6006αA-crystallinQ569M720141.083.173.68
Eukaryotic trans initiation factorP63242171
6037αA-crystallinQ569M72019−1.112.973.63
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
6061αA-crystallinQ569M72037−1.132.622.5
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6251
γA-crystallinP04345211
6176αA-crystallinQ569M72014−1.211.862.15
Activated RNA polymerase II transcriptional coactivator p15P11031144
6218αA-crystallinQ569M72014−1.751.74−2.06
GrifinQ9D1U0163
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
Spot numberProteinUNIPROT accession numberMW (kDa)Number of assigned spectraFold change
WT1 vs. WT2WT1 vs. homozygousWT2 vs. homozygous
1462Spectrin-αA3KGU5283161.0910.159.34
Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 4Q792Z1431
1538Spectrin-αA3KG45283591.218.336.91
Neuronal cell adhesion moleculeQ810U41398
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
Serrate RNA effector molecule homologQ99MR61002
Methionine synthaseA6H5Y31392
2296FilensinA2AMT17443−1.07−5.61−5.19
GelsolinP13020865
Calpain 3A2AVV5854
300160 kDa Heat shock protein, mitochondrialP630386116−1.116.236.95
T-complex protein 1 subunit thetaP42932609
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
Tubulin alpha-1A chainP68369504
Tubulin beta-5 chainP99024502
VimentinP20152541
Glutathione synthetaseP51855521
3084EzrinP2604069101.283.983.12
FascinQ61553555
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenaseQ61753573
α-EnolaseP17182472
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5282
Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmicQ922B2571
3295αA-crystallinQ569M720151.01−2.92−2.92
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6255
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0224
γE-crystallinQO3740213
γB-crystallinPO4344212
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]P08228162
3312αA-crystallinQ569M72023−1.12−5.51−4.9
3703αA-crystallinQ569M720131.0114.6814.6
Filaggrin-2Q5D8622481
3723αA-crystallinQ569M72014−1.582.994.75
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6253
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0223
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9241
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]P08228161
3737αA-crystallinQ569M720141.094.94.53
3857αA-crystallinQ569M720151.0931.6729.19
GrifinQ9D1U0161
4133αA-crystallinQ569M720111.223.933.24
GrifinQ9D1U0162
4545αA-crystallinQ569M720111.136.685.93
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0222
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
4932Fatty acid binding protein epidermalQ058162018−1.012.973.01
αA-crystallinQ569M7208
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0222
5163αA-crystallinQ569M72051.004.264.28
Fatty acid binding protein epidermalQ05816203
5169βB3-crystallinQ9JJU92461.3321.616.28
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1221
5182αA-crystallinQ569M7205−1.416.579.3
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9244
Calpain-3Q64691941
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QCX6251
5223αA-crystallinQ569M7206−1.06−4.42−4.15
5247αA-crystallinQ569M7204−1.052.692.84
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
5257αA-crystallinQ569M72031.053.333.21
Thymosin beta-4P2006561
5441αA-crystallinQ569M72041.438.355.85
5639αA-crystallinQ569M7205−1.054.835.1
5675αA-crystallinQ569M72051.248.296.71
Thymosin beta-4P2006562
5816αA-crystallinQ569M7207−1.216.457.83
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QCX6252
βA4-crystallinQ9KKV0222
5883Glutamate dehydrogenaseP264436131.244.013.26
5966Creatine kinase B-typeQ04447438−1.119.8222.03
αA-crystallinQ569M7207
Actin cytoplasmic 1P60709425
COP9 signalosome complex subunit 4O88544464
26 S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Q9WJJ2433
Erlin-2Q8BFZ9382
Activator of 90 kDa HSP ATPase homolog 1Q8BK64382
Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-IP60843461
Succinyl-CoA subunit betaQ9Z2I9381
Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthaseQ920E5501
Glutaredoxin-3Q9CQM9381
5976βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9248−1.1714.7317.35
αA-crystallinQ569M7206
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1223
βB2-crystallinP62696232
GelsolinP13020862
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6251
γN-crystallinQ8VHL5211
6042αA-crystallinQ569M72051.13112.49100.21
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9245
α-EnolaseP17182473
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1222
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5282
Poly(γC)-binding protein 1P60335372
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6251
γN-crystallinQ8VHL5211
6051Glutamate dehydrogenase mitochondrialP26443614−1.273.734.75
MyoglobinP04249171
6224αA-crystallinQ569M72051.3423.7617.83
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9244
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1222
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6251
6312αA-crystallinQ569M72071.13−2.72−3.04
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
6457βB3-crystallinQ9JJU924181.195.945.03
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7213
γF-crystallinQ9CXV3213
Triosephosphate isomeraseP17751271
αB-crystallinP23927201
6465βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52818−1.013.293.35
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6255
Proteasome subunit 1 type 4P99026295
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0222
βA2-crystalinQ9JJV1221
6484αA-crystallinQ569M72061.346.745.05
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5285
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6253
Proteasome subunit 1 type 4P99026292
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9241
6546αA-crystallinQ569M720101.785.923.34
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9249
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5285
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6254
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1223
βS-crystallinO35486211
6567αB-crystallinP2392720171.549.135.96
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9248
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
βS-crystallinO35486215
γF-crystallinQ9CXV3214
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6253
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1221
6605βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62515−1.324.395.83
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU92412
αB-crystallinP23927207
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1225
βS-crystallinO35486213
γF-crystallinQ9CXV3212
6607αA-crystallinQ569M72012−1.042.822.95
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7216
αB-crystallinP23927204
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5284
Calcium-regulated heat stable protein 1Q9CR86163
γF-crystallinQ9CXV3212
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1221
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0221
γC-crystalinQ61597211
6642αA-crystallinQ569M7205−1.1810.2212.14
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6251
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7211
6652αA-crystallinQ569M72071.179.17.79
6663αA-crystallinQ569M7206−1.216.798.29
6678Hemoglobin subunit αP019421511.3411.018.26
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphateP25856421
Hemoglobin subunit βP11758161
6791αA-crystallinQ569M72051.2710.077.96
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6253
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
6920αA-crystallinQ569M72076−1.2321.7126.75
6981αA-crystallinQ569M7205−1.0026.3326.6
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7211
Activated RNA polymerase II transcriptional coactivator P15P11031141
Adenosine receptor A2BQ60614361
7559αA-crystallinQ569M72015−2.298.3819.32
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6255
StathminP54227174
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9243
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0222
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]P08228161
Fatty acid binding protein, epidermalQ05816151

WT, wild-type.

Figure 2

Quantitative analysis of abundance changes in proteins from postnatal 2-day-old WT and αA-R49C knock-in lenses by mass spectrometry.

The 3D data sets for representative proteins in two WT (WT1 and WT2) and one αA-R49C heterozygous or αA-R49C homozygous mutant sample are shown. WT1 and WT2 proteins were labeled with Cy2 and Cy3 dyes, respectively and αA-R49C mutant proteins with Cy5. Fold changes between each sample are indicated on the right. See Table 1 for the identity of proteins present in each protein spot.

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 2-day-old mice with knock-in of the αA-R49C mutation.

(A) 2D gel of cyanine dye-labeled lens proteins derived from wild-type sample 1 (WT1) proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αA-R49C heterozygous proteins labeled with Cy5. (B) 2D gel of cyanine dye-labeled lens proteins derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αA-R49C homozygous proteins labeled with Cy5. Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gels shown in (A) and (B) are shown in Fig. S1 in File S1 and were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins are listed in Table 1. Arrows indicate the shift in position of the αA-crystallin bands (red) to a more acidic pI with the mutation.

Quantitative analysis of abundance changes in proteins from postnatal 2-day-old WT and αA-R49C knock-in lenses by mass spectrometry.

The 3D data sets for representative proteins in two WT (WT1 and WT2) and one αA-R49C heterozygous or αA-R49C homozygous mutant sample are shown. WT1 and WT2 proteins were labeled with Cy2 and Cy3 dyes, respectively and αA-R49C mutant proteins with Cy5. Fold changes between each sample are indicated on the right. See Table 1 for the identity of proteins present in each protein spot. WT, wild-type. There was an increase in β-globin, histone and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase associated with αA-crystallin in homozygous lenses (Table S1). The abundance of αB-crystallin, hemoglobin, and histones also increased. A spot containing a high molecular weight form of spectrin-α and nucleosome assembly protein increased in homozygous lenses. In the high molecular weight region, the abundance of αA-crystallin and spectrin increased and that of filensin, gelsolin, and calpain 3 decreased in homozygous lenses. There was an increase in mitochondrial 60-kDa HSP associated with αA-crystallin, and many other proteins including vimentin. Among proteins in the cytoskeletal and 20 kDa regions (Table 1, Fig. 1 and Fig. S1 in File S1), there was an increase in αA-crystallin associated with βB3-crystallin, βA4-crystallin, grifin, fatty acid binding protein, thymosin, and glutamate dehydrogenase in homozygous lenses. Surprisingly, the amount of αA-crystallin alone and in association with βA3/A1-crystallin, βA4-crystallin, γE-crystallin, and γA-crystallin in the high molecular weight region decreased in homozygous lenses. Increased amounts of degraded proteins were detected in the low molecular weight region (<20 kDa). The amount of degraded glutamate dehydrogenase alone and in association with cytochrome c increased 4-fold and 53-fold, respectively, in homozygous lenses. The amount of more acidic forms of αA-crystallin, and more degraded forms of creatine kinase B, αA-crystallin, actin, and phakinin increased 19-fold in homozygous lenses. In the molecular weight range below 20 kDa, the amount of degraded αB-crystallin associating with βA2-crystallin, α-enolase, and other proteins increased 112-fold in homozygous lenses. The amount of other degradation products of αA-crystallin associated with β- and γ-crystallins also increased in homozygous lenses. Some of these were more basic than the original αA-crystallin. The amount of a very acidic cohort of αA-crystallin with βA3/A1-crystallin, hemoglobin subunit α, and G3PDH increased 7-fold in homozygous lenses. There was also an increase in the amount of a very low molecular weight αA-crystallin associated with stathmin and other β-crystallins in homozygous lenses. Previous work demonstrated that there is less insoluble protein in heterozygous lenses than in homozygous lenses [10]. To determine whether changes in protein abundance reflect this difference in solubility, equal amounts of WT, heterozygous, and homozygous mutant lens proteins were further analyzed on multiple gels using various combinations of cyanine dyes to label WT and mutant lens samples. Multi-gel analysis of WT and αA-R49C mutant proteins is shown in Table 2 and Figures 3 and 4. Biological variation analysis (BVA) of WT and αA-R49C heterozygous and homozygous lenses showed that mutant gene dosage correlated with an increase in alanyl-tRNA synthetase, αA-crystallin, the mammalian cytoplasmic chaperone TCP-1 theta, and high-molecular weight βA3/A1-crystallin. The statistical significance of the change in protein abundance of each spot is shown in Table 2. The levels of two different members of the HSP70 protein family, HSC70 and mitochondrial stress protein 70, as well as the V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit, also increased in αA-R49C mutant lenses. Mitochondrial stress protein 70 increased in two spots (spots 928 and 948) and TCP-1 associated with αA-crystallin increased in three spots (spots 593, 1081, and 1146). High molecular weight βB1-crystallin increased slightly in a mutation- and dose-dependent manner. The abundance of βA3/A1-crystallin associated with αA-crystallin (spot 1477) and αA-crystallin alone (spot 1612) decreased. It is noteworthy that for several spots, the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05) between WT and the αA-R49C homozygous lenses only. The 79-fold increase in αA-crystallin (spot 1540) in the high molecular weight region was highly significant, suggesting increased crosslinking of αA-crystallin in αA-R49C mutant lenses. Creatine kinase B associated with αA-crystallin in the high molecular weight region increased 22-fold (spot 1519), confirming the results of the single gel analysis in Table 1. The amount of αA-crystallin associated with eukaryotic translational initiation factor increased 1.44- and 2.24-fold in heterozygous and homozygous mutant lenses, respectively. Among the proteins that showed decreased abundance in a mutation- and dosage-dependent manner were βB1-crystallin (spots 1856 and 1868) associated with eukaryotic translational initiation factor, αA-crystallin associated with histone H4, implantin, myotrophin, and more basic αA-crystallin associated with βA4- and βA3/A1-crystallins in spot 2772.
Table 2

Multi-gel analysis of proteins that showed differences in abundance between 2-day-old WT and heterozygous or homozygous αA-R49C lenses.

Spot numberProteinUNIPROT Accession numberMW (kDa)Number of assigned spectraFold change/t-test (p-value)
WT vs. heterozygousWT vs. homozygousHeterozygous/ homozygous
593Alanyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmicQ8BGQ7107122.01/0.0352.28/0.021−1.13/0.43
αA-crystallinQ569M7202
T-complex protein 1 subunit thetaP42932602
Glutathione synthetaseP51855522
884βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62511.02/0.831.65/0.017−1.62/0.0048
Putative uncharacterized proteinQ3UAF6421
928Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinP6301771281.15/0.111.42/0.018−1.24/0.077
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunitP505166817
Stress-70 protein, mitochondrialP38647745
Alpha-fetoproteinP02772673
948Stress-70 protein, mitochondrialP386477461.39/0.0641.79/0.017−1.29/0.12
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinP63017713
Glutathione synthetaseP51855521
1081T-complex protein 1 subunit thetaP4293260161.93/0.0532.03/0.044−1.05/0.43
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
1131Seryl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmicP266385821.39/0.131.62/0.051−1.17/0.04
1146αA-crystallinQ569M72097.67/0.003710.91/0.0018−1.42/0.075
T-complex protein 1 subunit thetaP42932603
1190βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52811.1/0.221.28/0.013−1.16/0.029
1351FilensinA2AMT17461.26/0.0061.22/0.0141.03/0.68
Eukaryotic translation initiation factorP60229523
1477αA-crystallinQ569M7205−3.53/0.063−4.25/0.0431.2/0.47
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
1519Creatine kinase B- typeQ04447431115.85/0.0002622.33/0.0001−1.41/0.14
αA-crystallinQ569M7209
Putative uncharacterized proteinQ3UAF6422
1540αA-crystallinQ569M7201153.41/6.9e-00579.7/5.10E-05−1.49/0.077
1582αA-crystallinQ569M7201310.11/0.002514.62/0.0014−1.45/0.098
1612αA-crystallinQ569M7209−2.77/0.12−4.82/0.0411.74/0.19
1625αA-crystallinQ569M72012.75/0.031−1.42/0.213.9/0.01
Fructose-biphosphate aldolase AP05064361
1659αA-crystallinQ569M720121.44/0.00272.24/0.0069−1.56/0.12
Eukaryotic translation initiation factorQ9QZD9362
Putative uncharacterized proteinQ3UAF6421
1767Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseP16858362−2.11/0.085−1.78/0.069−1.19/0.12
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1O88569372
1786Heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein A1P49312345−1.93/0.053−1.16/0.42−1.67/0.088
1856βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52881.08/0.54−1.65/0.0891.77/0.0045
1865βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52813−2.14/0.0017−1.42/0.075−1.51/0.057
1868βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5288−1.04/0.47−1.48/0.0491.42/0.12
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4HQ9WUK2272
1902βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ528121.06/0.50−2/0.00752.13/0.0022
2640αA-crystallinQ569M7209−2.15/0.00096−2.66/0.000221.24/0.036
Histone H4P62806112
Implantin (fragment)P8389121
2661Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis protein 2Q9EQZ71731−2.38/0.0391.00/0.95−2.39/0.021
2684MyotrophinP62774132−1.32/0.11−1.57/0.0331.19/0.16
2772αA-crystallinQ569M7208−3.65/0.074−7.3/0.032/0.18
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0223
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
1923βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52821.43/0.053−1.54/0.0192.2/0.011
2018αA-crystallinQ569M7208−1.4/0.021−1.13/0.35−1.24/0.059
Implantin (fragment)P8389122
Coactosin-like proteinQ9CQI6162
2109βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62512−1.16/0.18−1.49/0.0341.28/0.15
αA-crystallinQ569M7206
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0225
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1222
2115βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6259−3.14/0.059−3.92/0.0341.25/0.48
αB-crystallinP23296209
βB2-crystallinP62696239
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9248
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1228
αA-crystallinQ569M7206
2123αA-crystallinQ569M72017−4.44/0.029−8.57/0.0161.93/0.17
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6258
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1228
βB2-crystallinP62696236
αB-crystallinP23296203
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
2154αA-crystallinQ569M72012−1.44/0.0024−1.26/0.0094−1.14/0.13
2233αB-crystallinP232962019−1.59/0.084−1.8/0.0531.13/0.35
γD-crystallinQ6PGI02016
γA-crystallinP04345217
γF-crystallinQ9CXV3214
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7213
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
PlectinQ9QXS15342
2261γA-crystallinP043452121.65/0.074−1.53/0.112.52/0.022
αB-crystallinP23296202
2294αA-crystallinQ569M720164.16/0.0205.64/0.012−1.36/0.054
2317αA-crystallinQ569M72014−2.83/0.095−5.09/0.0321.8/0.17
2320αA-crystallinQ569M72021−4.85/0.11−9.28/0.0351.91/0.14
2337βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6258−2.28/0.024−3.49/0.061.53/0.23
αA-crystallinQ569M7208
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1222
2351αA-crystallinQ569M720124.61/0.005710.45/0.0049−2.27/0.14
2388αA-crystallinQ569M720101.48/0.275.71/0.038−3.85/0.074
2413γD-crystallinQ6PGI02010−1.14/0.86−3.8/0.0463.33/0.007
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomeraseP17742186
γA-crystallinP04345216
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7214
γC-crystallinQ61597214
2417αA-crystallinQ569M720157.51/0.002310.53/0.0015−1.4/0.15
2454Nucleoside diphosphate kinaseE9PZF0306−1.25/0.016−1.47/0.00671.18/0.11
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomeraseP17742184
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0203
αA-crystallinQ569M7203
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7212
2462αA-crystallinQ569M7203−1.48/0.12−2.08/0.0171.41/0.021
γN-crystallinQ8VHL5212
2469Nucleoside diphosphate kinaseE9PZF0306−1.37/0.052−1.56/0.0231.14/0.17
αA-crystallinQ569M7203
2501γC-crystallinQ61597212−1.55−2.11/0.0121.36
2533αA-crystallinQ569M7203−1.82/0.10−2.44/0.0271.34/0.26
2538αA-crystallinQ569M7203−2.41/0.021−2.32/0.067−1.04/0.88
40S ribosomal protein S12P63323152
2553Fatty acid-binding protein epidermalQ058161512−1.96/0.67−3.48/0.21.77/0.19
αA-crystallinQ569M7207
2631αA-crystallinQ569M7202−2.58/0.13−2.92/0.0381.13/0.079

WT, wild-type.

Figure 3

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of WT, αA-R49C heterozygous, and αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses using a pool-based analysis.

(A) WT samples were labeled with Cy2, a pool of all samples (containing WT, αA-R49C heterozygous and homozygous proteins) was labeled with Cy3, and the αA-R49C heterozygous mutant sample was labeled with Cy5. The pool sample was a common comparator for each sample. (B, C) Spots that were selected based on analysis of the gels are shown. Quantitative image analysis by biological variation analysis was performed across several samples, and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 3.

Figure 4

Pool-based quantitative analysis of changes in abundance of postnatal 2-day-old lens proteins from WT and αA-R49C knock-in lenses by mass spectrometry.

The 3D data sets for representative proteins in one WT, one pool, and one αA-R49C heterozygous or αA-R49C homozygous mutant sample are shown. WT proteins were labeled with Cy2, pool proteins with Cy3, and αA-R49C heterozygous mutant proteins with Cy5. Fold changes between each sample are indicated on the right. See Table 2 for the identity of proteins present in each protein spot.

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of WT, αA-R49C heterozygous, and αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses using a pool-based analysis.

(A) WT samples were labeled with Cy2, a pool of all samples (containing WT, αA-R49C heterozygous and homozygous proteins) was labeled with Cy3, and the αA-R49C heterozygous mutant sample was labeled with Cy5. The pool sample was a common comparator for each sample. (B, C) Spots that were selected based on analysis of the gels are shown. Quantitative image analysis by biological variation analysis was performed across several samples, and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 3.
Table 3

Protein spots that showed a change in abundance between 2-week-old WT and αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses.

Spot numberProteinUniprot accession numberMW (kDa)Number of assigned spectraFold change
WT1 vs. WT2WT1 vs. homozygousWT2 vs. homozygous
700Spectrin α-2A3KGU528347−1.6−13.77−8.51
769Spectrin α-2A3KGU5283201.77−8.19−14.35
γA-crystallin212
1164Adult male sm. intestine cDNAQ9CPN9261−2.56−7.87−3.05
2448FilensinA2AMT17439−2.05−15.14−7.32
2675FilensinA2AMT1748−1.893.817.27
78 kDa glucose-regulated protein precursorP20029724
GTP binding protein Di- Ras 1Q91Z61221
Collagen α2v chain precursorQ3U9621451
267678 kDa glucose-regulated protein precursorP200297212−1.873.46.42
3641PhakininQ6NVD94624−1.59−10.22−6.38
3880PhakininQ6NVD946151.238.336.82
16 days embryo kidney cDNAQ3TGJ9817
4035αA-crystallinQ569M72081.007.717.76
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6254
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5282
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
4058βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62571.773.792.16
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5281
Fructose-bisphosphate aldolaseA6ZI44451
4101αA-crystallinQ569M72081.23.412.86
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6256
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5281
4111αA-crystallinQ569M7203−1.49−10.27−6.85
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6253
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
40S ribosomal protein SA(Laminin receptor 1)P14206331
4191αA-crystallinQ569M7207−1.0726.3228.36
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5282
4207PhakininQ6NVD94682.02−9.58−19.19
αA-crystallinQ569M7201
4217αA-crystallinQ569M720101.365.674.21
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6257
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5282
PhakininQ6NVD9462
4627αA-crystallinQ569M72081.2122.4418.67
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
Adult male stomach cDNAQ3Y2E0272
Adult male sm. intestine cDNAQ9CPN9261
WD repeat-containing protein 81Q5ND34961
NOD-derived CD11c positive dendritic cells cDNAQ5ND34171
4872αA-crystallinQ569M7205−1.313.995.26
Annexin A5ANXA5365
Adult male stomach cDNAQ3Y2E0272
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9261
SRC kinase signaling inhibitor 1Q9QWI61351
Filamin-BQ80X902781
Probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HERC2Q4U2R15281
5218βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ528131.76−24.55−42.86
5225βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52820−1.05−6.09−5.72
5236βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52820−1.27−8.76−6.82
Complement factor C2Q792Q3531
5608βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52815−1.23−8.75−7.05
αA-crystallinQ569M7201
5609βB3-crystallinQ9JJU924191.4321.1814.97
Glutathione S-transferase µA2AE89245
βB2-crystallinP62696233
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5281
Complement factor C2Q792Q3531
Adult male sm. intestine cDNAQ9CPN9261
5617βB2-crystallinP626962334−1.55−8.44−5.38
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU92412
Glutathione S-transferase µA2AE89245
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ5281
5625βB2-crystallinP626962317−1.38−18.58−13.36
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9246
Heat shock protein B1 (HspB1)P14602232
Glutathione S-transferase µA2AE89242
NOD-derived Cd11c-positive dendritic cells cDNAQ3TCH2252
5695βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62566−1.53−20.2−13.04
βB2-crystallinP626962356
βB3-crystallinCRBB32413
START domain containing 9AZAKH94081
5719βB2-crystallinP6269623461.238.386.87
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62536
βB3-crystallinCRBB32432
βB1-crystallinCRBB12810
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
5753βB3-crystallinCRBB324671.499.826.67
βB2-crystallinP626962329
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6259
5789βB3-crystallinCRBB324401.0217.6617.52
βB1-crystallinCRBB12821
βB2-crystallinP62696236
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
Development and differentiation enhancing factor 2Q7SIG61073
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6252
5799βB1-crystallinCRBB12838−1.113.8915.37
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62511
Proteasome subunit beta type 4P99026296
αA-crystallinQ569M7203
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0223
Development and differentiation enhancing factor 2Q7SIG61072
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9262
Prickle3 proteinQ8CIL5721
βB3-crystallinCRBB3241
Cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 precursorQ9QZM3251
βA2-crystallinCRBA2221
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein homolog A yeastQ4QY64871
Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 33 precursorQ8BMT4771
Adult male testis cDNA RIKENQ9D9G7281
GTP-binding protein Di-Ras1Q91Z61221
NOD-derived CD11c positive dendritic cells cDNAQ8VDD8551
16 days neonate thymus cDNAQ3TRH2481
Bone marrow macrophage cDNAQ3UAB1_MOUSE501
DNA polymerase epsilon subunit 2DPOE2_MOUSE591
5830βB1-crystallinCRBB128291.19−8.59−10.09
βS (γS-crystallin)O354862115
γC-crystallinQ615972114
γB-crystallinQ6PHP72110
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6254
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0214
Glutathione S-transferase P1P19157243
αA-crystallinQ569M7202
6012αB-crystallinP2392720421.0714.0813.3
γB-crystallinQ6PHP72129
βA2-crystallinCRBA22225
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62523
βS (γS-crystallin)O354862120
γN-crystallinQ8VHL52118
αA-crystallinQ569M72015
γA-crystallinP04345218
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0217
γC-crystallinQ61597213
6117αB-crystallinP239272043−1.144.515.17
γB-crystallinQ6PHP72124
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC62517
βA2-crystallinCRBA22214
γA-crystallinP043452111
γD-crystallinQ6PGI02110
γS-crystallinO35486217
αA-crystallinQ569M7204
γN-crystallinQ8VHL5214
γC-crystallinQ61597213
γE-crystallinA2RTH4213
Sodium channel voltage-gated Type III alphaA2ASI52211
6161αB-crystallinP2392720301.6110.36.45
αA-crystallinQ569M72019
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7216
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6256
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0215
βA2-crystallinCRBA2224
γA-crystallinP04345213
Tenascin precursorQ80YX12322
Mark 1 proteinQ14DQ3881
Tenascin precursorQ80YX12321
6341αA-crystallinQ569M720311.2−60.51−71.83
αB-crystallinP23927209
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6256
βA2-crystallinCRBA2225
γN-crystallinQ8VHL5215
βB1-crystallinCRBB1284
βA4-crystallinQ9JJV0223
γA-crystallinP04345212
6352αA-crystallinQ569M720251.2−13.31−15.81
αB-crystallinP239272014
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6257
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9263
Cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 precursorQ9QZM3253
Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 33 precursorQ8BMT4772
ELMO domain-containing protein 1Q3V1U8382
γA-crystallinP04345211
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein homolog A yeastQ4QY64871
βA2-crystallinCRBA2221
Adult male testis cDNA RIKENQ9D9G7281
GTP-binding protein Di-Ras 1Q91Z61221
Regulator of nonsense transcripts 1Q9EPU01241
6485αA-crystallinQ569M720261.3534.0825.47
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9262
αB-crystallinP23927202
Adult male testis cDNA RIKENQ9D9G7282
γA-crystallinP04345211
Pyruvate carboxylase, mitochondrialQ059201301
GTP-binding protein Di-Ras 1Q91Z61221
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5 (chromosome fragility-associated gene 1 proteinQ4QY642041
MKIAA0327 splice variantQ8CHE51021
6520γA-crystallinP0434521321.22−5.96−7.23
γB-crystallinQ6PHP72122
γC-crystallinA3RLD42119
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0218
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9261
6663αA-crystallinQ569M720351.7515.248.8
γC-crystallinA3RLD42111
γA-crystallinP04345218
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7217
2 days neonate thymus thymic cells cDNAQ7TNP7693
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9262
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0212
Nuclear protein localization protein 4 homologP60670682
6668αA-crystallinQ569M720281.7273.8243.31
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9262
2 days neonate thymus thymic cells cDNAQ7TNP7692
Nuclear protein localization protein 4 homologP60670682
Adult male testis cDNA RIKENQ9D9G7282
ELMO domain-containing protein 1Q3V1U8382
Prickle3 proteinQ8CIL5722
6788αA-crystallin and many othersQ569M720302.57498.57195.82
Nuclear protein localization protein 4 homologP60670683
2 days neonate thymus thymic cells cDNAQ7TNP7692
7068αA-crystallinQ569M72027−1.05−21.14−20.03
2 days neonate thymus thymic cells cDNAQ7TNP7692
Prickle3 proteinQ8CIL5722
γA-crystallinP04345212
7089γS-crystallinO3548621141.76−8.63−15.01
γC-crystallinA3RLD4218
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7213
αA-crystallinQ569M7202
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0211
7269αA-crystallinQ569M720221.155.7251.25
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein homolog A yeastQ4QY64872
Palmitoyl protein thioesterase-like proteinQ8R2F8161
7419αA-crystallinQ569M72018−2.3314.0432.99
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein homolog A yeastQ4QY64872
2 days neonate thymus thymic cells cDNAQ7TNP7692
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9262
7540αA-crystallinQ569M720201.0291.891.26
Ceruloplasmin precursorQ611471218
Heparin cofactor 2 precursorHEP2_mouse544
Plexin-A4 precursorQ80UG22133
AttractinQ9WU601583
Serum Amyloid-P componentQ4JFI8263
Lumican precursorP51885382
GelsolinP13020862
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein homolog A yeastQ4QY64872
ELMO domain-containing protein 1Q3V1U8382
Complement factor I precursorQ61129672
7568αA-crystallinQ569M72017−1.45134.39197.02
Ceruloplasmin precursorQ611471219
GelsolinP13020864
Lumican precursorP51885384
Pyruvate carboxylase, mitochondrialQ059201303
Plexin-A4 precursorQ80UG22133
ELMO domain-containing protein 1Q3V1U8383
Complement factor I precursorQ61129673
Cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 precursorQ9QZM3252
GTP-binding protein Di-Ras 1Q91Z61222
MyoferlinQ69ZN72332
7751αA-crystallinQ569M72091.15160.65141.07
Ceruloplasmin precursorQ611471218
Lumican precursorP51885384
ELMO domain-containing protein 1Q3V1U8382
Cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 precursorQ9QZM3252
8192αA-crystallinQ569M72071.2475.0861.08
Ceruloplasmin precursorQ611471217
Lumican precursorP51885383
ELMO domain-containing protein 1Q3V1U8383
Adult male testis cDNA RIKENQ9D9G7283
Adult male small intestine cDNAQ9CPN9262
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein homolog A yeastQ4QY64872

WT, wild-type.

Pool-based quantitative analysis of changes in abundance of postnatal 2-day-old lens proteins from WT and αA-R49C knock-in lenses by mass spectrometry.

The 3D data sets for representative proteins in one WT, one pool, and one αA-R49C heterozygous or αA-R49C homozygous mutant sample are shown. WT proteins were labeled with Cy2, pool proteins with Cy3, and αA-R49C heterozygous mutant proteins with Cy5. Fold changes between each sample are indicated on the right. See Table 2 for the identity of proteins present in each protein spot. WT, wild-type. Additional proteins that decreased in abundance relative to wild type (Fig. 4 and Table 2) were βB1-crystallin (in homozygous lenses only), and a mutation- and dose-dependent decrease in βA3/A1-, βA4-, βA2-crystallins associated with αA-crystallin (spot 2109), αB-crystallin, and βB2-crystallin (spots 2115 and 2123 showed a 8.57-fold decrease in homozygous lenses relative to WT). The abundance of γD-crystallin, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, γA-crystallin, γB-crystallin, and γC-crystallin also decreased (spot 2413). Other spots that decreased in abundance in a mutation- and dose-dependent manner were nucleoside diphosphate kinase, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, and γD-crystallin (spot 2454), fatty acid-binding protein and αA-crystallin (spot 2553). A more acidic form of αA-crystallin increased 4- and 5-fold in heterozygous and homozygous lenses (spot 2294). In contrast, spot 2317 decreased 4.8- and 9.2-fold in heterozygous and homozygous mutant lenses, respectively. Spot 2351 increased in a mutation- and dose-dependent manner with 4.6- and 10.4-fold increases in heterozygous and homozygous lenses, respectively. Spots 2317 and 2351 contained only αA-crystallin at its normal molecular weight, but spot 2351 was more acidic, suggesting a decrease in the pI of αA-crystallin by the R49C mutation. Spot 2417, containing only a lower-than normal molecular weight αA-crystallin also increased 7.5- and 10.5-fold in αA-R49C mutant lenses relative to WT, but two additional spots containing only αA-crystallin decreased (spots 2533 and 2631). The abundance of epidermal fatty acid binding protein and 40S ribosomal protein S12 also decreased in association with αA-crystallin, but these changes were not mutation- and dose-dependent.

Two-week Old αA-R49C Mouse Lenses

Figure 5 shows 2D gels for 14-day-old WT and mutant proteins of αA-R49C knock-in mice. Table 3 shows the approximately 50 protein spots that showed a change in abundance between WT and αA-R49C mutant in 14-day-old lenses. The abundance of the high molecular weight cytoskeletal protein spectrin-α and its acidic forms decreased in αA-R49C lenses (spots 700 and 769). Acidic forms of filensin increased 4-fold (spot 2675), whereas basic forms decreased 15-fold (spot 2448). Hsp70 also increased 3- to 6-fold in three spots. High molecular weight phakinin decreased 10-fold, while acidic and low molecular weight phakinin increased 8-fold.
Figure 5

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 14-day-old mice induced by knock-in of the αA-R49C mutation.

(A) A 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αA-R49C homozygous lens proteins labeled with Cy5. (B, C) Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gel in (A) are shown. Proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches of spots that were selected from the gels. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 3.

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 14-day-old mice induced by knock-in of the αA-R49C mutation.

(A) A 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αA-R49C homozygous lens proteins labeled with Cy5. (B, C) Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gel in (A) are shown. Proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches of spots that were selected from the gels. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 3. WT, wild-type. Among the crystallins, the amount of αA-crystallin that was crosslinked and associated with βA3/A1-crystallin increased in four spots, and αA-crystallin associated with annexin increased 3-fold in one spot (spot 4872). Normal and basic forms of βB1-crystallin decreased 6- to 25-fold in three spots. More basic forms of βB2- and βB3-crystallins in association with glutathione S-transferase-µ (GST-µ) increased 8-21-fold in two spots. Very acidic forms of βB2-crystallin, βB3-crystallin, and GST-µ decreased 18-fold in spot 5625. αB-crystallin that was degraded and associated with β- and γ-crystallins increased in two spots. The amount of αA-crystallin slightly larger than 20 kDa decreased 60- to 71-fold (spot 6341), and 13-fold when associated with β- and γ-crystallins (spot 6352). Acidic and degraded αA-crystallin increased 34-fold (spot 6485). Spots containing γA-, γB-, γC-, and γD-crystallins decreased 6-fold. Degraded αA-crystallin associated with γC-, γA-, and γB- crystallins increased 15-fold. Nine spots containing degraded αA-crystallin increased in mutant lenses, whereas degraded but more basic forms than the original αA-crystallin decreased in abundance (spots 7068, 7089, and 7419). Wild type and αA-R49C homozygous lenses were further analyzed (Fig. S2 in File S1 and Table S1). There was a large change in βB2-crystallin expression with age of the wild type lenses (from 2 days to 2 weeks). Spots 5446 and 5466 (Table S1) show an increase in βB2-crystallin in wild type mouse lenses confirming the results of a previous study [23].

Two-week Old αB-R120G Mouse Lenses

Figure 6 shows 2D gels for 14-day-old WT and mutant proteins of αB-R120G knock-in mice. Table 4 shows the approximately 50 protein spots that showed a change in abundance between WT and mutant spots in the 14-day-old lenses. Figure 7 shows 3D plots for some of the protein spots that changed in abundance in the αB-R120G mutant lenses. Heterozygous αB-R120G lenses showed several spots with decreased abundance of phosphoglycerate mutase (spots 5353, 5441, 5456 and 5468). Phosphoglycerate mutase was the only protein in spots 5353 and 5468 but was associated with βB1-crystallin in spots 5441 and 5456. αA- and αB-crystallins decreased in a very basic high molecular weight spot (spot 2982). The abundance of αA-crystallin increased 2.8- to 10- fold in spot 6415, and was slightly degraded and more acidic than normal αA-crystallin. In the same region, spots 6449 and 6848 (αA-crystallin associated with grifin) increased 12-fold and 2.5 fold, respectively. Degraded and more basic forms of αA-crystallin alone (spots 6920 and 7257) or with αB-crystallin and βB3-crystallin (spot 7451) also increased in abundance in heterozygous lenses. A spot containing αA-, γA-, γB-, γC-, and γD-crystallins also decreased 2.7-fold in heterozygous lenses.
Figure 6

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 14-day-old mice induced by knock-in of the αB-R120G mutation.

(A) 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy5, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αB-R120G heterozygous lens proteins labeled with Cy2. (B) 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αB-R120G homozygous proteins labeled with Cy5. (C, D) Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gel shown in (A) and (B) are shown in (C) and (D), respectively. Proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches of spots that were selected from analysis of the gels. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 4.

Table 4

Quantitative analysis of protein abundance in 14-day-old WT, αB-R120G lenses heterozygous and homozygous.

Spot numberProteinUNIPROT accession numberMW (kDa)Number of assigned spectraWT1 vs. WT2WT1 vs. heterozygousWT2 vs. heterozygous
2982αB-crystallinP239272021.19−1.82−2.34
αA-crystallinQ569M7201
RIKEN cDNA 2210010C04, isoform CRA_bQ9CPN9261
Probable peptide chain release factor C12orf65 homolog, mitochondrialQ80VP5211
4441αA-crystallinQ569M72011.13−2.03−2.48
5353Phosphoglycerate mutaseO702502921.15−2.06−2.55
5432βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ528171.06−1.81−2.06
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9245
αA-crystallinQ569M7201
αB-crystallinP23927201
5441βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52821.06−1.93−2.2
Phosphoglycerate mutaseO70250292
5456βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52851.22−1.94−2.56
Phosphoglycerate mutaseO70250294
γC-crystallinQ61597211
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7211
5468Phosphoglycerate mutaseO70250292−1.03−2.4−2.52
5492βB1-crystallinQ9WVJ52811.17−2.95−3.72
Riken cDNA2210010C04 isoformCRA-bQ9CPN9261
5960Putative uncharacterized proteinQ8C2C12011.3−2.52−3.52
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7211
Riken cDNA2210010C04 isoformCRA-bQ9CPN9261
6005γC-crystallinQ615972111.54−1.81−2.99
6056αB-crystallinP239272025−1.179.2310.02
βB2-crystallinP626962310
βA3/A1-crystallinQ9QXC6259
αA-crystallinQ569M7207
βS-crystallinO35486214
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0214
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9244
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7212
βA2-crystallinQ9JJV1222
6415αA-crystallinQ569M72073.2810.012.83
6449αA-crystallinQ569M72053212.675.87
6848GrifinQ9D1U0165−1.042.422.33
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
6920αA-crystallinQ569M7204−1.551.892.71
7257αA-crystallinQ569M7206−1.132.72.84
7451αB-crystallinP239272061.135.614.59
αA-crystallinQ569M7205
βB3-crystallinQ9JJU9242
7739αA-crystallinQ569M7205−1.112.392.47
Riken cDNA2210010C04 isoform CRA-bQ9CPN9261
6061γC-crystallinQ61597212−1.04−2.63−2.73
αA-crystallinQ569M7202
γB-crystallinQ6PHP7212
γD-crystallinQ6PGI0211
γA-crystallinP04345211

WT, wild-type.

Figure 7

Quantitative analysis of the changes in abundance of proteins in postnatal 14-day-old lens from WT and αB-R120G knock-in mice by mass spectrometry.

The 3D data sets for representative proteins in two WT (WT1 and WT2) and one αB-R120G mutant sample are shown. (A) WT1 and WT2 proteins were labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 dyes, respectively, and αB-R120G heterozygous mutant lenses with Cy2. (B) WT1 and WT2 proteins were labeled with Cy2 and Cy3 dyes, respectively, and αB-R120G homozygous mutant lenses with Cy5. Fold changes between each sample are indicated on the right. See Table 4 for the identity of proteins present in each protein spot.

2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 14-day-old mice induced by knock-in of the αB-R120G mutation.

(A) 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy5, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αB-R120G heterozygous lens proteins labeled with Cy2. (B) 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from WT1 proteins labeled with Cy2, WT2 proteins labeled with Cy3, and αB-R120G homozygous proteins labeled with Cy5. (C, D) Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gel shown in (A) and (B) are shown in (C) and (D), respectively. Proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches of spots that were selected from analysis of the gels. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 4.

Quantitative analysis of the changes in abundance of proteins in postnatal 14-day-old lens from WT and αB-R120G knock-in mice by mass spectrometry.

The 3D data sets for representative proteins in two WT (WT1 and WT2) and one αB-R120G mutant sample are shown. (A) WT1 and WT2 proteins were labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 dyes, respectively, and αB-R120G heterozygous mutant lenses with Cy2. (B) WT1 and WT2 proteins were labeled with Cy2 and Cy3 dyes, respectively, and αB-R120G homozygous mutant lenses with Cy5. Fold changes between each sample are indicated on the right. See Table 4 for the identity of proteins present in each protein spot. WT, wild-type. Homozygous αB-R120G lenses showed an 8-fold increase in the abundance of a more acidic spot (5961) containing αB- and other crystallins, whereas the more basic spot 5963 decreased 5.6-fold. Spot 6120 containing αA-, αB-, and γB-crystallins also increased in abundance in homozygous lenses. This spot was more acidic than the other αB-crystallin spots and was located near the αA-crystallin position. Spot 5938, which was very close to spot 5963 but slightly more acidic, also decreased in abundance. Spots 7164 increased in abundance by 2.0-fold in αB-R120G homozygous lenses relative to WT. It contained both αA- and αB-crystallins, which were more degraded and basic than the original proteins. Overall, a few unique spots changed in abundance in αB-R120G homozygous lenses than in αB-R120G heterozygous lenses. To obtain a general perspective of cellular systems affected in the αA-R49C and αB-R120G mutant lenses, we mapped the proteins identified by mass spectrometric analysis to existing networks. These networks represent interactions known to occur among the proteins identified in our analysis. The interactions shown in these networks did not originate from lens tissue in our study. Ingenuity Pathway software analysis generated eight different networks for the proteins identified in the αA-R49C mutant lenses, two of which are shown in Figure 8, with additional networks shown in Fig. S3 in File S1. One network generated by this approach included the chaperones HSPA8 and HSPA2 which interact with αB-crystallin. A second network included histone H4 which has been shown to interact with the PI3kinase complex. Four different protein networks were generated by this method in the αB-R120G lenses including one in which the ubiquitin proteasome was at the hub (Figure S4). An interaction between the lens-specific protein grifin and the transcription factor IKZF1 was evident in both αA-R49C and αB-R120G mutant lenses (Figs. S3, S4 in File S1, and Table S2).
Figure 8

Ingenuity Pathways analysis of lens proteins identified in αA-R49C knock-in mutant lenses.

Analysis of altered protein networks by Ingenuity Pathway software. Biological networks and pathways generated from input data (Wild-type vs. αA-R49C, Tables 1-3 and Table S1) indicate proteins with altered abundance in gray. (A) A network with HSPA8 at the hub. (B) A second network highlights Histone H4 at the hub of the protein connectivity map. Additional networks are shown in Fig. S3 in File S1.

Ingenuity Pathways analysis of lens proteins identified in αA-R49C knock-in mutant lenses.

Analysis of altered protein networks by Ingenuity Pathway software. Biological networks and pathways generated from input data (Wild-type vs. αA-R49C, Tables 1-3 and Table S1) indicate proteins with altered abundance in gray. (A) A network with HSPA8 at the hub. (B) A second network highlights Histone H4 at the hub of the protein connectivity map. Additional networks are shown in Fig. S3 in File S1.

Discussion

Several mechanisms can cause hereditary cataracts, including increases in protein mass, aggregation, insolubility, and light scattering. In the present study, we characterized changes in protein abundance at an early postnatal age in mouse lenses with knock-in mutations of αA- or αB-crystallins. We also investigated proteins that showed increased association with αA- or αB-crystallins in mutant lenses, defined by an increase in the level of urea-resistant protein in the same spot. Several important assumptions of this study require further discussion. The present study identified changes in abundance of many spots in which αA- or αB-crystallin was present together with other proteins. This association indicates similar pI and molecular weights of the ancillary proteins and the α-crystallin in these spots. We cannot speculate on the mechanism by which the proteins are associated with α-crystallins. Our evidence from 2D-gel analysis is suggestive of an association, but is not conclusive. Since this association was observed in multiple gels of wild type and knock-in mutant lenses, the presence of αA- and/or αB-crystallin with specific proteins in the same spots is suggestive of a true association. Previous studies suggest that mutant α-crystallins may exert a gain-of-toxic function on the lens [25]. Thus, it is possible that the differences in protein abundances between normal and knock-in mouse lenses may not be directly due to incompetent chaperones per se, although a previous study with the αA and αB-crystallin DKO mouse lenses strengthens the conclusions of the present work [23]. Nevertheless, a toxic gain-of function by the mutant α-crystallins could be a potential factor in the observed results. There was a significant decrease in the abundance of actin (15.6-fold), filensin (17.5-fold), βA3/A1-crystallin, γD-crystallin (6-fold), and grifin (1.74-fold). We also observed degradation of glutamate dehydrogenase, which was associated with cytochrome c in some spots. Because the abundance of these proteins changed at a young age, even in the heterozygous mutant αA-R49C lens, with no apparent change in lens morphology, it is very likely that they are in vivo substrates of α-crystallin. Our analysis also suggests that enzymes involved in lens metabolism, such as creatine kinase B and phosphoglycerate mutase, and the detoxification enzyme GST-µ are in vivo substrates of αA- and αB-crystallins. These proteins may be structurally labile and might interact with αA- and αB-crystallins for conformational maintenance during the early stages of lens growth but become more stably associated with the protein when the chaperone is mutated. Structural analysis of these enzymes is necessary to reveal any common structural domains. These findings suggest that key metabolic pathways are involved in the mechanism of cataract formation by the αA-R49C or αB-R120G mutations. The decrease in phosphoglycerate mutase levels in the postnatal αB-R120G knock-in mouse lens suggests that mutation of the chaperone protein in the lens affects lens metabolism even before the opacification process becomes evident. The association of histones with αA-crystallin increased in the mutant lenses. The possibility that histones are protected by α-crystallins is particularly important because histones are critical and long-lived proteins [26]. The R49C mutant of αA-crystallin exhibits increased apoptosis and aberrant accumulation of nuclei in the lens, suggesting a possible explanation for the increased abundance of histones [15], [27]. We previously reported an increased abundance of histones in αA/αB double knock-out (DKO) lenses [23], and in lens cells expressing another human cataract-related mutant of αA-crystallin in which the arginine 116 residue is replaced by cysteine [28]. Therefore it seems likely that histones may be protected by αA- and αB-crystallins in the lens. In 2-week-old αA-R49C mutant lenses there was an increase in αA-crystallin associated with annexins. These proteins are associated with apoptosis, which has been observed in the αA-R49C mouse. Interestingly, phosphoglycerate mutase, α-enolase, and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase are oxidized and have reduced enzyme activities in Alzheimer's disease, another disease associated with protein aggregation [29]. An intriguing observation of the present study was the presence of albumin in the 2-day-old lens (Table 1). Extracellular albumin, an abundant protein in the aqueous humor, becomes internalized in the lens in vivo [30]. It has been suggested that albumin is a carrier for lipids and other metabolites, and could be essential for normal lens physiology [31], [32]. A decrease in plasma albumin has been linked with an increased risk of human cataract [33]. The abundance of the spot containing albumin, αA-crystallin and filensin showed a 3.6-fold variation between the two biological replicates of the WT mouse lens, and increased 16- to 17-fold in the αA-R49C heterozygous lenses. Further studies will be necessary to understand the significance of these observations. We detected increased αA-crystallin in protein spots containing cytoskeletal proteins, and increased abundance of degraded and more acidic cytoskeletal proteins including spectrin-α, filensin, phakinin, tubulin, vimentin, and microtubule-associated protein RP/EB in the αA-R49C mutant knock-in lenses. The abundance of filensin and phakinin decreased in αA-R49C mutant lenses, suggesting that these proteins are in vivo substrates for αA-crystallin. The spectrin-actin membrane skeleton contributes significantly to lens fiber cell organization and is functionally linked to the phakinin-filensin network [34]. Disruption of the spectrin-actin membrane cytoskeletal complexes may therefore be responsible for the morphological changes observed in αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses at an early age [27], [35]. There was also an increase in the amount of degraded and more acidic grifin, a protein whose interaction with αA-crystallin has been demonstrated previously [36], and the abundance of αA-R49C associated with grifin increased 16-fold in homozygous mutant lenses. The amount of hemoglobin subunit α decreased in αA-R49C homozygous mutant lenses indicating that it is a likely substrate for αA-crystallin. Previous studies support the possibility that destabilized forms of hemoglobin show increased binding to αB-crystallin in vitro [37]. We found an increase in β-crystallin isoforms with more acidic pI in the mutant lenses. Decreases in more basic forms of βB1- and βB3-crystallins and increases in more acidic forms indicate that αA-crystallin is a chaperone for these two crystallins. Furthermore, αA- and αB-crystallins were increasingly associated with β-crystallins in the mutant lenses, suggesting that they may have formed heteromeric complexes. Previous studies have identified covalent multimers of crystallins in aging human lenses [38]. Recently, the crosslinks between β-crystallin isoforms have been identified by mass spectrometry [39]. Deamidation of βB2-crystallin has been proposed to disrupt normal crystallin structure and short-range order necessary for lens transparency [40]. Deamidation has been shown to lower the temperature necessary for βB2-crystallin unfolding and aggregation, suggesting decreased βB2-crystallin stability, although its 3D dimeric structure was not significantly altered [41]. Interestingly, the nature and amount of the destabilized β-crystallin intermediate is important for recognition by the chaperone [42]. Decreased amounts of βB1-crystallin were detected in five spots and in an additional four spots containing other β-crystallin polypeptides. αA-crystallin was associated with β-crystallins in these spots. The decrease in βB1-crystallin was noteworthy because βB1-crystallin has a unique role in promoting higher order crystallin association in the lens, and any change in this order could result in increased light scattering and loss of transparency [43]–[45]. The amount of αA and αB-crystallins associating with βA3/A1-, βA2-, and βA4-crystallins increased significantly in homozygous 2-day-old lenses. Our studies also demonstrated a decrease in γ-crystallins in homozygous lenses at a young age. Many of these changes occurred in a mutation- and dose-dependent manner; i.e., changes in the amounts of certain proteins were greater in the complete absence of a WT αA-crystallin gene (homozygous mutant) than with only one copy of the WT gene (heterozygous mutant). Examples are shown in Tables 1-3 for the αA-R49C protein. The effect of developmental age was investigated using 2- and 14-day-old R49C mutant lenses (Fig. S2 in File S1 and Table S1). The increased abundance of several proteins and the degradation of αA-crystallin previously observed in 2-day-old homozygous mutant lenses were confirmed at 14 days. An important conclusion of the present study is that the αB-R120G mutation causes specific in vivo changes in protein abundance. Protein changes in the αB-R120G lenses were distinctly different from those in αA-R49C mutant lenses. The main changes in the αB-R120G mutant lens included altered abundance of β- and γ-crystallins, increased degradation of αA-, αB-, and γ-crystallins, and degradation of phosphoglycerate mutase, a glycolytic enzyme that is very important in metabolism but has not been studied in the lens in detail [46]–[49]. There was also a 12-fold increase in the amount of αA-crystallin associated with grifin in these lenses. Our studies demonstrated that 2-week-old αA-R49C homozygous lenses contained a high abundance of low molecular weight proteins (<14 kDa) indicating that the absence of WT αA-crystallin leads to protein instability, greater susceptibility to proteolysis, and protein degradation. This occurred as a primary event at an early postnatal stage. Previous studies have identified lens protein truncation with age in human lenses [50], [51]. In future work, we intend to identify the common structural features that make the proteins more labile to proteolysis, which will provide critical information needed to develop a model of in vivo cataract formation. Our previous studies involving molecular weight measurements of the αA-R49C homozygous lenses by light scattering also demonstrated an increase in low molecular weight proteins (∼15 kDa) in these lenses [10]. We first examined the presence of low molecular weight proteins in the homozygous lenses, and then compared WT, heterozygous, and homozygous lenses. We subsequently identified the low molecular weight proteins as αA-crystallin associated with other crystallins, gelsolin and degraded ceruloplasmin, that were absent from WT mouse lenses but abundant in 2-week-old αA-R49C homozygous lenses (Table 3). αA- and αB-crystallins were degraded in both αA-R49C and αB-R120G mutant lenses at a young age, suggesting that the mutations make these proteins less stable. Decreased stability was associated with increased crosslinking of αA-crystallin, as shown by the 15-fold increase in crosslinking of αA-crystallin to form a higher molecular weight form of approximately 40 kDa that corresponded to a crosslinked dimer. We detected increased crosslinking of αA-crystallin very early, even in lenses of 2-day-old postnatal αA-R49C heterozygous mice. Previous studies have shown that increased crosslinking can reduce the chaperone activity of α-crystallin [52]. We previously used immunoblot analysis to show an increase in the amount of water-insoluble αB-crystallin in 6-week-old αB-R120G mutant lenses [17]. We now demonstrate the presence of high molecular weight αB-crystallin in postnatal αB-R120G heterozygous and homozygous lenses, indicating that they appear early during postnatal development and consistent with their important role in opacification of αB-R120G heterozygous and homozygous lenses. In previous studies we investigated the effect of αA/B double knock-out. The expression of βB2-crystallin increased 40-fold in 6-week-old αA/B DKO lens epithelial cells; however, the upregulation of βB2-crystallin protein was not observed in 2-day-old DKO lenses, indicating that this was not a physiological stress-induced effect but probably developmental. Surprisingly, in 6-week-old DKO mouse lenses we did not observe an increase of lower molecular weight (<14 kDa) proteins as seen in the knock-in lenses. This was the major difference between αA/B DKO lenses and αA-R49C homozygous lenses although there were other distinct differences between the proteins altered in knock-out versus knock-in αA-R49C mutant and αB-R120G mutant lenses. For example, the following effects were observed only in knock-in mutant lenses: increased abundance of creatine kinase B associated with αA-crystallin (only in αA-R49C mutant lenses); decreased abundance of phosphoglycerate mutase; changes in grifin associated with αA-crystallin; association of chaperones of the HSP70 and TCP-1 families with αA-crystallin (only in the αA-R49C mutant lenses); decreased abundance of in γ-crystallins; increased abundance of the apoptotic protein annexin. In contrast, degradation of titin, β1-catenin, and a decrease in serine threonine protein kinase were observed only in αA/αB DKO lenses. However, common features in our analyses of αA/αB-knock-out lenses and the αA-R49C and αB-R120G mutant knock-in lenses included changes in histones, hemoglobin, glutamate dehydrogenase, GST-µ, and βB1-crystallin. An increase in βB1-crystallin crosslinking and degradation was observed in the knock-in mutant lenses, but only its crosslinking increased in the knock-out lenses. Crosslinking of vimentin, tubulin, and actin increased and their abundance decreased in both knock-out and knock-in lenses. These differences in protein abundance and degradation among the three model systems indicate that specific cellular conditions dictate the substrates for α-crystallins during the early stages of lens development. This reveals variable substrate recognition by α-crystallins, which when fully understood may provide insights into how to limit the damage resulting from protein unfolding in cataracts and could implicate use of the aggregation-preventing properties of α-crystallins to control damage due to stress and disease. It has been proposed that a combination of interaction sites could be key in substrate recognition by αA-crystallin [53]. The interaction of α-crystallins with substrate proteins is non-covalent in nature, and hydrophobic interactions need only a subtle change on the protein surface of the target proteins. Hydrophobic interactions are probably more common than previously believed because proteins are dynamic systems. A very small area might become exposed and bind to a hydrophobic surface on the chaperone protein even though the particle size may not change sufficiently to cause light scattering. Moreover, changes in the pI of proteins can occur without a stability change. Surface anisotropy can change many times in response to unidentified factors in the environment of cells. There is no change in protein size in many hereditary cataracts caused by γ-crystallin mutations, instead the cataract is formed by increased electrostatic interaction between the positively charged E107A γD-crystallin and the negatively charged α-crystallins, which increases the amount of light scattering [54], [55]. This may also occur in αA-R49C and αB-R120G mutant proteins in which the negative charge on arginine is lost when it is replaced by cysteine or glycine, respectively, and the proteins have a more acidic pI, resulting in an increase in light scattering. Thurston et al. showed that the strength of the interaction between native γ- and α-crystallins is essentially optimal for lens transparency, and that a small increase in this interaction can increase light scattering and lead to cataract [56], [57]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the hierarchy in the interaction of αA- and αB-crystallins with different proteins and the interactive sequences involved. In summary, our studies demonstrate that characterization of changes in protein abundance in postnatal lenses is an effective way to identify in vivo substrates of αA- and αB-crystallins. Proteins that showed the greatest change in abundance at an early age are very likely to be in vivo substrates of the α-crystallins. Further quantitative studies are required to define the relationship(s) between binding of αA- and αB-crystallins and polymerization and subcellular distribution of the substrates identified in this study. This will provide new information into protein abundance changes that may occur in cataracts, even before the opacification process becomes obvious. Our approach could therefore characterize the in vivo state at the beginning of cataract development in the mouse lens, providing information necessary to develop interventional strategies to prevent future lens opacities.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Lenses

αA-R49C knock-in mice and αB-R120G knock-in mice were generated by stem cell-based techniques as described previously [17]. Mice were converted to the C57 background using speed congenics. Wild type (WT), heterozygous mutant, and homozygous mutant mice used in this study were genotyped by PCR-based methods. All procedures involving mice were performed by trained veterinary staff at the Mouse Genetics Core at Washington University. All protocols and animal procedures were approved by the Washington University Animal Studies Committee (protocol number 20110258). Lenses from two different age groups of αA-R49C knock-in mice (2-day old and 2-week-old) were analyzed by mass spectrometry (2-4 mice in each replicate set of WT1, WT2, and αA-R49C heterozygous mice and WT1, WT2, and αA-R49C homozygous mice). WT and αA-R49C knock-in mutant lenses were subjected to two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE). Lenses from 2-week-old αB-R120G heterozygous and homozygous mice were also analyzed by 2D-DIGE.

Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Lenses were dissected and placed in lysis buffer containing 30 mM Tris-HCl (BioRad, Hercules, CA), 2 M thiourea (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 7 M urea (BioRad), 4% CHAPS (BioRad), and 1× complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), pH 8.5. Lens proteins (50 µg) were labeled with 400 pmol Cy2, Cy3, or Cy5. Pools were prepared by mixing equal quantities of protein from each sample after dye labeling [58]. 2D-DIGE was performed at the Proteomics Core Laboratory according to published methods [59]. Briefly, samples were equilibrated onto immobilized pH gradient strips at 100 V and subjected to isoelectric focusing using a maximum of 10,000 focusing volts (PROTEAN IEF cell: BioRad). After focusing, proteins were reduced with Tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP, 10 mM) and alkylated with iodoacetamide (20 mM). The strip was then layered on a 10-20% polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Samples were imaged with a Typhoon 9400 Imager (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, New Jersey) using specific excitation and emission wavelengths for Cy2 (488 and 522 nm), Cy3 (520 and 580 nm), and Cy5 (620 and 670 nm). Control and experimental samples were labeled with blue or red fluorescent dyes and run on the same 2D gel [60], [61]. Image analysis was performed to assess differences between WT and homozygous/heterozygous mutant lenses. Individual protein spots that showed differential intensities were excised from the gel and analyzed by mass spectroscopy. Fold changes represented proteins with increased (positive numbers) or decreased (negative numbers) expression in mutant versus WT samples. Single or multi-gel analyses were used to determine changes in protein abundance between WT and knock-in mouse lenses. Single gel analysis was performed to compare the following conditions: WT and αA-R49C heterozygous and homozygous mutant lenses (Tables 1, 3, Figs. 1 and 2, Table S1), and WT and αB-R120G heterozygous and homozygous mutant lenses (Table 4, Figs. 6 and 7). In addition, multi-gel analysis was performed with a pooled internal standard. This approach was used to compare 2-day-old WT, αA-R49C heterozygous, and homozygous mutant lenses (Table 2 and Figs. 3 and 4). Multi-gel comparisons were performed using different combinations of sample sets. The WT sample was labeled with Cy2 and mutant samples were labeled with Cy5. A pool of all samples was labeled with Cy3 and served as a standard that was common to each gel. The pooled standard, the control, and one test sample were combined and run on each gel. Images were generated and compared within each 2D gel using DeCyder v.6.5 image analysis software (GE Healthcare). Differential in-gel analysis (DIA) was used to normalize and compare quantitative differences between images from each gel. Image analysis using DeCyder software generates a relative value for the abundance of the spot in different samples, but there is no mechanism to determine the statistical significance of the differences. We therefore performed analysis of combined biological replicates for the different genotypes. In addition, we used Biological Variation Analysis (BVA) for the 2-day-old αA-R49C knock-in mouse lenses to obtain statistical significance as described below [59].

Analysis of Pool-Based Data

Pool-based studies involved a pool of proteins from all samples in the experiment, providing a common comparator for each sample. Because the pool is identical on each gel, the fold change “difference” for a spot in the pool image is 1.0 (representing no change) when comparing pool images from any two gels. This designation allowed us to compare protein amounts for spots of WT or αA-R49C heterozygous lens samples to the pool on the same gel to determine relative amounts of protein. Although WT and mutant samples were resolved on different gels, their fold changes were determined in comparison to the pooled sample, which was also run on each gel. Because the pool from one gel is identical to the pool from another, the WT and mutant fold change values could be directly compared. Pairwise analysis of proteins across different physical gels was performed using the BVA module to quantify relative differences between the samples [59]. BVA compares the quantitative value of the spot as it is represented among different samples. BVA data generates t-test and assigns p value to identify statistical significance. p < 0.05 denotes statistical significance (Table 2).

Database Searching

The mass spectra were acquired using nano-LC-MS as previously described [62]. All tandem mass spectrometry samples were analyzed using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.1.1.0) as previously described [23]. Mascot was set to search the Uniprot mouse database (downloaded 12/28/2010, 135387 entries) using trypsin as the digestion enzyme, with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.80 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 50 ppm for data from the LTQ FT mass spectrometer. The QSTAR data were searched using a parent and fragment tolerance of 0.1 Da. The iodoacetamide derivative of cysteine was specified in Mascot as a fixed modification and methionine as a variable modification. Scaffold software (v. 3.6.1) was used to display proteomic data. Additional data processing details have been previously described [59].

Criteria for Protein Identification

Scaffold (version Scaffold_3_01_00, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) was used to qualify MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications [63]. Protein identification was accepted if identity could be established at >95.0% probability and involved at least one identified peptide. Protein probabilities were assigned using the Protein Prophet algorithm ([64] AI et al 2003). Proteins that contained similar peptides but were not differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Mass spectra for all the proteins identified in this study are shown in Table S4.

Knowledge-based Network Analysis

After false positive analysis (Protein Prophet) and removal of contaminants (e.g., keratins), proteins listed in Tables 1-4 and S1 (identified by UNIPROT accession numbers) were entered into Ingenuity Pathways (www.ingenuity.com) (IPA, version 8.8, Redwood City, CA) as a *.xls file. The software mapped 99 of 118 Gi numbers, corresponding to 99 gene symbols. Duplicate names corresponding to the same gene were eliminated. Ingenuity was set to generate up to 25 networks containing up to 35 members each, with no additional restrictions. Biological networks and pathways were generated from the input data (‘focus genes”) and gene objects in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base (IPKB). Interaction networks generated using this method showed proteins present in our samples as shaded in grey and other interacting proteins not identified from these gels as unshaded. Analysis of proteins that showed differences in abundance between 2-day-old WT, 14-day-old WT and 2-day-old αA-R49C homozygous mouse lenses. WT, Wild-type. (DOC) Click here for additional data file. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) molecules table for proteins affected by αA-crystallin R49C mutation in the mouse lens. (XLS) Click here for additional data file. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) molecules table for proteins affected by αB-crystallin R120G mutation in the mouse lens. (XLS) Click here for additional data file. Mass spectrometry and database search results for proteins identified in this study. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. Supplementary figures. Figure S1, 2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 2-day-old mice with knock-in of the αA-R49C mutation. Protein spots that were picked for analysis from the 2D gels of WT and αA-R49C heterozygous (A) and WT and αA-R49C homozygous lenses (B-D) shown in Figure 1. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table 1. Figure S2, 2D-DIGE analysis of proteomic changes in whole lenses of 2-day-old and 14-day-old mice induced by knock-in of the αA-R49C mutation. (A) A 2D gel of lens proteins labeled with cyanine dyes derived from 2-day-old WT proteins labeled with Cy3, 14-day-old WT proteins labeled with Cy5, and αA-R49C homozygous lens proteins labeled with Cy2. (B, C) Protein spots that were selected for analysis from the gel shown in (A). Proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry and Mascot searches of spots that were selected from the gels. Quantitative image analysis and mass spectrometry data for the identified proteins from these gels are listed in Table S1. Figure S3, Protein connectivity networks identified by Ingenuity Pathway analysis of lens proteins in αA-R49C knock-in mutant lenses. Analysis of altered protein networks by Ingenuity Pathway software. Biological networks and pathways generated from input data (Wild type vs. αA-R49C, Tables 1–3 and S1) indicate proteins with changed abundance in gray. (A) A network with GAPDH at the hub. (B) A second network with F-actin at the hub. (C) A third network highlights NPM1 at the hub of the protein connectivity map. (D) A fourth network with TGFB1 at the hub. (E) A fifth network indicates the interaction between grifin and IKZF1. (F) A sixth network shows Gm5409 at the hub. Note that two additional networks are shown in Figure 8. Figure S4, Networks revealed by Ingenuity Pathway analysis of lens proteins that changed in amount in WT vs. αB-R120G knock-in lenses. Biological networks and pathways generated from input data (Wild type vs. αB-R120G, Table 4) indicate proteins with changed abundance in gray. (A) A network with MAF at the hub. (B) A second network with UBC at the hub. (C) A third network shows the interactions between grifin and IKZF1. (D) A fourth network highlights CTRB2 at the hub of the protein connectivity map. (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  63 in total

1.  Subunit exchange demonstrates a differential chaperone activity of calf alpha-crystallin toward beta LOW- and individual gamma-crystallins.

Authors:  Tatiana Putilina; Fériel Skouri-Panet; Karine Prat; Nicolette H Lubsen; Annette Tardieu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Ageing and vision: structure, stability and function of lens crystallins.

Authors:  Hans Bloemendal; Wilfried de Jong; Rainer Jaenicke; Nicolette H Lubsen; Christine Slingsby; Annette Tardieu
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Effect of a single AGE modification on the structure and chaperone activity of human alphaB-crystallin.

Authors:  Jaya Bhattacharyya; Ekaterina V Shipova; Puttur Santhoshkumar; K Krishna Sharma; Beryl J Ortwerth
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Use of proteomic methods to identify serum biomarkers associated with rat liver toxicity or hypertrophy.

Authors:  David E Amacher; Rick Adler; Athula Herath; R Reid Townsend
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Cataract-associated mutant E107A of human gammaD-crystallin shows increased attraction to alpha-crystallin and enhanced light scattering.

Authors:  Priya R Banerjee; Ajay Pande; Julita Patrosz; George M Thurston; Jayanti Pande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Characterization of control and immobilized skeletal muscle: an overview from genetic engineering.

Authors:  J St-Amand; K Okamura; K Matsumoto; S Shimizu; Y Sogawa
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparative proteomic analysis of intra- and interindividual variation in human cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Yan Hu; James P Malone; Anne M Fagan; R Reid Townsend; David M Holtzman
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Proteomic analysis of anoxia tolerance in the developing zebrafish embryo.

Authors:  Bryce A Mendelsohn; James P Malone; R Reid Townsend; Jonathan D Gitlin
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Comparative proteomic analysis identifies age-dependent increases in the abundance of specific proteins after deletion of the small heat shock proteins αA- and αB-crystallin.

Authors:  Usha P Andley; James P Malone; Paul D Hamilton; Nathan Ravi; R Reid Townsend
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Progressive disruption of cellular protein folding in models of polyglutamine diseases.

Authors:  Tali Gidalevitz; Anat Ben-Zvi; Kim H Ho; Heather R Brignull; Richard I Morimoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 63.714

View more
  16 in total

1.  Specific sequences in the N-terminal domain of human small heat-shock protein HSPB6 dictate preferential hetero-oligomerization with the orthologue HSPB1.

Authors:  Michelle Heirbaut; Frederik Lermyte; Esther M Martin; Steven Beelen; Frank Sobott; Sergei V Strelkov; Stephen D Weeks
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Co-chaperoning by amyloid-forming proteins: cystatins vs. crystallins.

Authors:  Eva Žerovnik
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 3.  Differential role of arginine mutations on the structure and functions of α-crystallin.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Panda; Sandip Kumar Nandi; Ayon Chakraborty; Ram H Nagaraj; Ashis Biswas
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-14

4.  Heterologous expression of Oenococcus oeni sHSP20 confers temperature stress tolerance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yan Li; Xiaoguang Xu; Rui Qu; Guoqiang Zhang; Muhammad Shahid Riaz Rajoka; Dongyan Shao; Chunmei Jiang; Junling Shi
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Oxysterol Compounds in Mouse Mutant αA- and αB-Crystallin Lenses Can Improve the Optical Properties of the Lens.

Authors:  Kehao Wang; Masato Hoshino; Kentaro Uesugi; Naoto Yagi; Barbara K Pierscionek; Usha P Andley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.925

6.  RNA aptamers targeted for human αA-crystallin do not bind αB-crystallin, and spare the α-crystallin domain.

Authors:  Prabhat K Mallik; Hua Shi; Jayanti Pande
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  The lens actin filament cytoskeleton: Diverse structures for complex functions.

Authors:  Catherine Cheng; Roberta B Nowak; Velia M Fowler
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Molecular mechanism of the chaperone function of mini-α-crystallin, a 19-residue peptide of human α-crystallin.

Authors:  Priya R Banerjee; Ajay Pande; Alexander Shekhtman; Jayanti Pande
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Changes in relative histone abundance and heterochromatin in αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin knock-in mutant mouse lenses.

Authors:  Usha P Andley; Brittney N Naumann; Paul D Hamilton; Stephanie L Bozeman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-07-02

10.  Probing the changes in gene expression due to α-crystallin mutations in mouse models of hereditary human cataract.

Authors:  Usha P Andley; Eric Tycksen; Brittney N McGlasson-Naumann; Paul D Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.