BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that Tai Chi Chuan can improve cardiac function in patients with heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the effects of Tai Chi Chuan on cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: We performed a search for studies published in English, Portuguese and Spanish in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Data were extracted in a standardized manner by three independent investigators, who were responsible for assessing the methodological quality of the manuscripts. RESULTS: The initial search found 201 studies that, after review of titles and abstracts, resulted in a selection of 12 manuscripts. They were fully analyzed and of these, nine were excluded. As a final result, three randomized controlled trials remained. The studies analyzed in this systematic review included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of coronary artery disease, all were clinically stable and able to exercise. The three experiments had a control group that practiced structured exercise training or received counseling for exercise. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 months. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence suggests that Tai Chi Chuan can be an unconventional form of cardiac rehabilitation, being an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, the methodological quality of the included articles and the small sample sizes clearly indicate that new randomized controlled trials are needed in this regard.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that Tai Chi Chuan can improve cardiac function in patients with heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the effects of Tai Chi Chuan on cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: We performed a search for studies published in English, Portuguese and Spanish in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Data were extracted in a standardized manner by three independent investigators, who were responsible for assessing the methodological quality of the manuscripts. RESULTS: The initial search found 201 studies that, after review of titles and abstracts, resulted in a selection of 12 manuscripts. They were fully analyzed and of these, nine were excluded. As a final result, three randomized controlled trials remained. The studies analyzed in this systematic review included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of coronary artery disease, all were clinically stable and able to exercise. The three experiments had a control group that practiced structured exercise training or received counseling for exercise. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 months. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence suggests that Tai Chi Chuan can be an unconventional form of cardiac rehabilitation, being an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, the methodological quality of the included articles and the small sample sizes clearly indicate that new randomized controlled trials are needed in this regard.
In Brazil, cardiovascular diseases, in particular coronary arterial disease (CAD),
are one of the major causes of morbidity/mortality and are responsible for a
significant share of costs associated with hospitalizations in the Sistema Único de
Saúde (National Health System) and pharmacological management[1-3]. In this context, nonpharmacological approaches such as
lifestyle modifications and regular practice of physical exercise have been
investigated with the aim of offering patients better treatment and decreasing the
overall cost for the Brazilian healthcare system[3,4]. Patients who
undergo exercise-based therapy are likely to exhibit an improvement in several
aspects of cardiopulmonary function, which optimizes the balance between oxygen
supply and demand in the ischemic myocardium[5-11].Some oriental exercises deserve special attention because they are accessible,
inexpensive, and can be performed within the community[12]. Of the various techniques available, we highlight
Tai Chi Chuan (TCC), an ancient Chinese martial art that includes low to moderate
intensity traditional aerobic exercises[13]. This practice essentially involves learning a sequence of
movements that can vary according to different styles. Most preliminary exercises
include circular displacements with circular and spiral body movements. The sequence
is nothing more than a basis for detailed work on the body and mind[12]. In China, TCC has been used for
centuries as an exercise for people of various age groups; it is very popular among
the elderly[14]. Individuals
practice TCC primarily to develop mind-body interaction, breathing and movement
control, eye-hand coordination, and a peaceful state of mind. With the aging of the
world population and increasing healthcare costs, the interest toward TCC has
increased, and it is now used for the management of chronic diseases of various
etiologies[14-18].The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature on studies
that examine TCC as a modality for cardiac rehabilitation and raise questions for
future research on the use of TCC in CAD patients.
Methods
Eligibility criteria
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese
that reported on TCC training in patients aged > 18 years with confirmed CAD
were included. It was necessary to include a control group that practiced any
type of structured physical exercise (aerobic, resistance, or a combination of
both) and/or received counseling for physical exercise.Structured physical exercise was defined as an intervention wherein patients were
engaged in a planned program with individualized exercises under the supervision
of qualified professionals. Counseling for physical exercise was defined as an
intervention wherein the patients, although not involved or partially involved
in supervised physical training, received formal instructions to perform regular
exercise with or without individualized prescription.
Exclusion criteria
Studies that examined cardiovascular outcomes in healthy individuals, RCTs
conducted in patients with stroke, duplicated publications or substudies of the
included studies, and studies with a follow-up duration of < 8 weeks were
excluded.
Search strategy and study selection
We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed), EMBASE,
LILACS, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane CENTRAL) without data
restriction. In addition, we assessed the references cited in the included
studies. The literature search was conducted in July 2012, and the review of
articles was performed in triplicate by independent investigators. The search
strategy via MEDLINE included the following terms: ["Ischemic heart
disease"(Mesh) OR "Ischemia, Myocardial" OR "Ischemias, Myocardial" OR
"Myocardial Ischemias" OR "Ischemic Heart Disease" OR "Heart Disease, Ischemic"
OR "Disease, Ischemic Heart" OR "Diseases, Ischemic Heart" OR "Heart Diseases,
Ischemic" OR "Ischemic Heart Diseases"] OR ["Coronary disease"(Mesh) OR
"Coronary Diseases" OR "Disease, Coronary" OR "Diseases, Coronary" OR "Coronary
Heart Disease" OR "Coronary Heart Diseases" OR "Disease, Coronary Heart" OR
"Diseases, Coronary Heart" OR "Heart Disease, Coronary" OR "Heart Diseases,
Coronary"] AND ["Tai ji"(Mesh) OR "Tai-ji" OR "Tai Chi" OR "Chi, Tai" OR "Tai Ji
Quan" OR "Ji Quan, Tai" OR "Quan, Tai Ji" OR "Taiji" OR "Taijiquan" OR "T'ai
Chi" OR "Tai Chi Chuan"].First, a reference database was created and duplicates were excluded.
Subsequently, three independent investigators (CAS, LFF, and JNF) reviewed the
titles and abstracts. Abstracts that did not meet the eligibility criteria were
excluded, and the full text of Abstracts that did not provide sufficient
information about inclusion and exclusion criteria was reviewed. In a second
stage, the same reviewers assessed and selected the full texts, blinded to each
other's review. Differences among the reviewers were solved by consensus.
Data extraction and quality assessment
The three reviewers used the same standardized forms to independently perform
data extraction. We collected data referring to the studies' methodological
characteristics, interventions, and outcomes (maximum or peak oxygen
consumption, arterial pressure, and heart rate); the differences were solved by
consensus.
Assessment of the risk of bias
The quality of the studies in terms of randomization was assessed independently
as follows: blinding of the patients and evaluators of outcomes regarding
allocation, analysis of intention-to-treat, and report of losses or exclusions.
The authors' description of the analysis of intention-to-treat was assumed as a
criterion for assurance that both baseline and final evaluations used the same
number of patients, excluding those who were lost or eliminated from the study.
Studies that did not describe an analysis of intention-to-treat, those that did
not describe the total number of patients at the end of the study, and those in
which the number of patients at the beginning and end was not the same were
considered to not meet this criterion. The methodological quality of each study
was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook[19]. (Table 1).
Table 1
Criteria for the evaluation of the methodological quality adapted from
the Cochrane handbook
Study
The study mentions randomization in the text
Generation of the sequence of randomization
Blinding of allocation
Blinding of the participants and personal
evaluations
Blinding of the evaluation of results
The evaluation of results of incomplete data
Selected publications
Channer et al [20]
A
NC
NC
NC
NC
I
I
Sato et al [21]
A
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
A
Liu et al [22]
A
NC
NC
I
NC
A
A
A, adequate; NC, not clear; I, inadequate
Criteria for the evaluation of the methodological quality adapted from
the Cochrane handbookA, adequate; NC, not clear; I, inadequate
Results
Description of the studies
Our search resulted in 201 abstracts with language restrictions (English,
Portuguese, and Spanish). After the titles and abstracts were reviewed, a total
of 12 articles met the eligibility criteria and were completely analyzed (Figure 1). Of these 12 articles, nine were
excluded: three that did not mention the use of randomization in patient
allocation, two in which the control group did not receive guidance with regard
to physical exercise, one that was a systematic review, one that was a report of
preliminary data, and two that did not provide the full text of the article (one
only had the abstract, and we could not buy it or contact the authors).
Therefore, three studies were included in this systematic review. The latter
included samples of patients diagnosed with ischemic disease who were clinically
stable and able to exercise (Table 2).
The follow-up duration varied between 2 and 12 months.
Figure 1
Study selection flowchart.
Table 2
Studies that compared Tai Chi Chuan to structured physical training or
counseling for physical activity in patients with ischemic cardiac
disease
Study
Total number of individuals (men/women)
Age (years)
Main diagnosis
Intervention/control
Duration (months)
Mean Delta in the Tai Chi Chuan group
Channer et al [20]
126
(90/36)
56
(39 - 80)
Acute
myocardial infarction
Tai
Chi Chuan, aerobic exercise, Health and relaxation education
group
2
Heart rate: +2 bpm
Systolic arterial pressure: −3 mmHg
Diastolic arterial pressure: −2 mmHg
Sato
et al [21]
20
(13/7)
68 ±
4
Coronary arterial disease
Tai
Chi Chuan Usual care group with physical activity
counseling
12
Peak oxygen consumption: +0,1
L.min-'
Heart rate: −4 bpm
Systolic arterial pressure: −6 mmHg
Baroreflex sensitivity: +2,2 ms/mmHg;
variability in heart rate
Low frequency: -16ms2
High
frequency: +18ms2
Liu et al [22]
30 (18/12)
ND
Post-event or heart surgery
Tai Chi Chuan Cardiac rehabilitation
group
3
Chair stand: +3 repetitions
Sit and stand test: +3 repetitions
Step test: +29 repetitions
8-foot up-and-go: -1s
One-leg stand: +29s
NA: not available.
Study selection flowchart.Studies that compared Tai Chi Chuan to structured physical training or
counseling for physical activity in patients with ischemic cardiac
diseaseNA: not available.
Risk of bias
Of the studies included in the systematic review, 100% were randomized. None of
them described the blinding of allocation, blinding of patients and researchers,
or blinding of the evaluators of outcomes in detail. None of the studies made
explicit use of the intention-to-treat principle in their statistical
analyses.
Effects of interventions
In the first clinical trial, Channer et al[20] randomized patients with acute myocardial infarction
into a group that practiced TCC, a group that practiced conventional aerobic
exercise, and a control group that was given health and relaxation advice. After
2 months, the TCC and aerobic exercise groups exhibited a decreased systolic
arterial pressure. Patients in the TCC group, in addition to a decrease in
resting heart rate after exercise, exhibited greater adherence to the training
sessions. There was no comparison between groups.In the study by Sato et al[21],
the randomized subjects in the TCC group exhibited a significant increase in
baroreflex sensitivity after 12 months of follow-up, whereas those in the
control group did not. The results were adjusted for age, gender, ejection
fraction, and body mass index. Changes in the parameters of heart rate
variability did not exhibit differences between the groups.The third RCT included in this review assessed outcomes related to the patients'
functional capacity. After 3 months of follow-up, the participants in the TCC
group exhibited an increase in the chair stand test score and one-leg stand test
time and were faster than individuals in the control group in the 8-foot
up-and-go test. In addition, the TCC group exhibited increased flexibility and
an increased number of repetitions in the step test[22].
Discussion
Summary of the evidence
The results of this systematic review suggest that the use of TCC as an exercise
and cardiac rehabilitation strategy can have beneficial effects in CAD patients.
However, evidence from the western literature is limited, and the studies lack
methodological rigor as well as more relevant outcomes.
Positive aspects
This systematic review had some strengths. First, it was a focused review.
Second, it was based on a comprehensive and systematic bibliographic search.
Third, it employed methodology that used explicit and reproducible eligibility
criteria. Lastly, it was conducted in collaboration with a multidisciplinary
team of researchers (physicians, physiotherapists, and physical exercise
counselors).
Limitations
This systematic review also has some limitations. Because most of the results
reported were positive, the possibility of publication bias cannot be ruled out.
Moreover, we observed that these RCTs were methodologically limited by a certain
degree of measurement bias because there was no reference to blinding (patients,
therapists, and evaluators) or confidentiality regarding blinding of allocation.
Finally, our search was restricted to studies published in English, Spanish, and
Portuguese. It is possible that articles on TCC as a form of CAD rehabilitation
have been published in Mandarin or in other languages.
Conclusions
This review analyzed the literature on the beneficial use of TCC, a nonconventional
therapy, for the rehabilitation of patients with CAD through a systematic search of
various electronic databases. However, the methodological quality of the included
articles and the small size of the samples indicate a clear need for new randomized
clinical trials on this subject. It is worth noting that, because of the small
number of studies published in this area of knowledge and the limited variety of
outcomes, it was not possible to conduct a systematic review with a
meta-analysis.
Authors: Gloria Y Yeh; Malissa J Wood; Beverly H Lorell; Lynne W Stevenson; David M Eisenberg; Peter M Wayne; Ary L Goldberger; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: G T O'Connor; J E Buring; S Yusuf; S Z Goldhaber; E M Olmstead; R S Paffenbarger; C H Hennekens Journal: Circulation Date: 1989-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rodrigo A Ribeiro; Renato G B Mello; Raquel Melchior; Juliana C Dill; Clarissa B Hohmann; Angélica M Lucchese; Ricardo Stein; Jorge Pinto Ribeiro; Carisi A Polanczyk Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2005-07-21 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Tom G Briffa; Simon D Eckermann; Alison D Griffiths; Phillip J Harris; M Rose Heath; Saul B Freedman; Lana T Donaldson; N Kathryn Briffa; Anthony C Keech Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2005-11-07 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Jing Ma; Jian Wei Zhang; Hua Li; Lian Shan Zhao; Ai Ying Guo; Zai Hao Chen; Wen Yuan; Tian Ming Gao; Ya Meng Li; Cui Han Li; Hong Wei Wang; Bo Song; Yu Long Lu; Mei Ze Cui; Qiu Yang Wei; Shao Jun Lyu; Heng Chan Yin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-07-05 Impact factor: 2.692