| Literature DB >> 24759887 |
Xiaowei Wei1, Enke Zhang2, Chun Wang1, Dongying Gu1, Lili Shen1, Meilin Wang3, Zhi Xu1, Weida Gong4, Cuiju Tang1, Jinglong Gao2, Jinfei Chen1, Zhengdong Zhang3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have demonstrated that the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) MAP3K1 rs889312 is a genetic susceptibility marker significantly associated with a risk of hormone-related tumors such as breast cancer. Considering steroid hormone-mediated signaling pathways have an important role in the progression of gastric cancer, we hypothesized that MAP3K1 rs889312 may be associated with survival outcomes in gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24759887 PMCID: PMC3997500 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients.
| Variables | No. of patients, n (%)N = 884 | No. of deaths, nN = 406 | Median OS(months) | Log-rank | HR (95% CI) |
|
| |||||
| ≤60 years | 416 (47.1%) | 188 | 97.0 | 0.325 | 1.00 |
| >60 years | 468 (52.9%) | 218 | 62.0 | 1.10 (0.91–1.34) | |
|
| |||||
| Male | 677 (76.6%) | 307 | 74.0 | 0.381 | 1.00 |
| Female | 207 (23.4%) | 99 | 63.0 | 0.90 (0.71–1.14) | |
|
| |||||
| Cardia | 102 (11.5%) | 51 | 78.0 | 0.707 | 1.00 |
| Body | 751 (85.0%) | 338 | 70.0 | 1.09 (0.82–1.45) | |
| Fundus/pylorus | 31 (3.5%) | 17 | 29.0 | 1.27 (0.72–2.34) | |
|
| |||||
| Poorly differentiated | 501 (56.7%) | 247 | 58.0 | 0.108 | 1.00 |
| Moderately/well differentiated | 300 (33.9%) | 126 | 78.0 | 0.85 (0.69–1.05) | |
| Unknown | 83 (9.4%) | 33 | 71.8 | 0.73 (0.54–1.04) | |
|
| |||||
| ≤5 cm | 556 (62.9%) | 234 | 73.9 | 0.0008 | 1.00 |
| >5 cm | 328 (37.1%) | 172 | 51.0 | 1.39 (1.16–1.75) | |
|
| |||||
| Intestinal | 376 (42.5%) | 146 | 76.8 | 0.0024 | 1.00 |
| Diffuse | 505 (57.1%) | 258 | 54.0 | 1.42 (1.16–1.72) | |
| Others | 3 (0.4%) | 2 | 33.0 | 1.91 (0.37–17.1) | |
|
| |||||
| T1 | 174 (19.7%) | 57 | 84.3 | 0.0003 | 1.00 |
| T2 | 129 (14.6%) | 55 | 78.0 | 1.38 (0.95–2.03) | |
| T3 | 6 (0.7%) | 3 | 70.0 | 1.48 (0.40–6.43) | |
| T4 | 575 (65.0%) | 291 | 51.0 | 1.81 (1.32–2.13) | |
|
| |||||
| N0 | 357 (40.4%) | 128 | 80.4 | <0.0001 | 1.00 |
| N1/N2/N3 | 527 (59.6%) | 278 | 47.0 | 1.71 (1.38–2.04) | |
|
| |||||
| M0 | 874 (98.9%) | 400 | 74.0 | 0.119 | 1.00 |
| M1 | 10 (1.1%) | 6 | 33.0 | 1.87 (0.80–7.18) | |
|
| |||||
| I | 235 (26.6%) | 80 | 82.7 | <0.0001 | 1.00 |
| II | 195 (22.1%) | 78 | 70.8 | 1.22 (0.90–1.68) | |
| III | 444 (50.2%) | 242 | 41.0 | 1.91 (1.46–2.28) | |
| IV | 10 (1.1%) | 6 | 33.0 | 2.60 (1.31–17.0) |
OS: overall survival; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
*Mean OS was presented when median OS could not be calculated.
Association between MAP3K1 rs889312 polymorphism and survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients in various genetic models.
| Genotype Models | Overall Patients, N = 884 | ||||||
| n (%) | Deaths | Median OS | Log-rank | Corrected | HR (95% CI) | ||
| Codominant | AA | 225 (25.5) | 95 | 94.0 | 0.046 | 0.032 | 1.00 |
| AC | 459 (51.9) | 230 | 52.0 | 1.30 (1.01–1.68) | |||
| CC | 200 (22.6) | 81 | 74.8 | 1.04 (0.77–1.40) | |||
| Dominant | AA | 225 (25.5) | 95 | 94.0 | 0.196 | – | 1.00 |
| AC/CC | 659 (74.5) | 311 | 62.0 | 1.18 (0.94–1.49) | |||
| Recessive | AA/AC | 684 (77.4) | 325 | 62.0 | 0.116 | – | 1.00 |
| CC | 200 (22.6) | 81 | 74.8 | 0.82 (0.65–1.05) | |||
| Overdominant | AA/CC | 425 (48.1) | 176 | 98.0 | 0.014 | 0.026 | 1.00 |
| AC | 459 (51.9) | 230 | 52.0 | 1.30 (1.06–1.58) | |||
| Additive | C allele | 0.98 (0.81–1.19) | |||||
| Trend | 0.840 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Codominant | AA | 91 (24.2) | 29 | 83.8 | 0.221 | – | 1.00 |
| AC | 206 (54.8) | 89 | 67.4 | 1.25 (0.82–1.91) | |||
| CC | 79 (21.0) | 28 | 75.7 | 0.82 (0.49–1.39) | |||
| Dominant | AA | 91 (24.2) | 29 | 83.8 | 0.150 | – | 1.00 |
| AC/CC | 285 (75.8) | 117 | 71.0 | 1.43 (0.95–2.17) | |||
| Recessive | AA/AC | 297 (79.0) | 118 | 76.1 | 0.617 | – | 1.00 |
| CC | 79 (21.0) | 28 | 75.7 | 0.90 (0.60–1.36) | |||
| Overdominant | AA/CC | 170 (45.2) | 57 | 81.9 | 0.097 | – | 1.00 |
| AC | 206 (54.8) | 89 | 67.4 | 1.38 (0.99–1.94) | |||
| Additive | C allele | 1.13 (0.83–1.56) | |||||
| Trend | 0.440 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Codominant | AA | 133 (26.3) | 65 | 67.0 | 0.072 | – | 1.00 |
| AC | 251 (49.7) | 140 | 39.0 | 1.40 (1.01–1.92) | |||
| CC | 121 (24.0) | 53 | 71.9 | 1.12 (0.78–1.61) | |||
| Dominant | AA | 133 (26.3) | 65 | 67.0 | 0.466 | – | 1.00 |
| AC/CC | 372 (73.3) | 193 | 48.0 | 1.12 (0.84–1.49) | |||
| Recessive | AA/AC | 384 (76.0) | 205 | 48.0 | 0.076 | – | 1.00 |
| CC | 121 (24.0) | 53 | 71.9 | 0.77 (0.57–1.05) | |||
| Overdominant | AA/CC | 254 (50.3) | 118 | 70.0 | 0.028 | 0.017 | 1.00 |
| AC | 251 (49.7) | 140 | 39.0 | 1.32 (1.03–1.69) | |||
| Additive | C allele | 0.91 (0.71–1.17) | |||||
| Trend | 0.470 | ||||||
OS: overall survival; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
*Mean OS was presented when median survival could not be calculated.
The log-rank P values less than 0.05 were corrected by a permutation test (n = 5000 random permutations).
Adjusted for sex, age, differentiation status, and TNM stage.
Figure 1Association of MAP3K1 rs889312 genotypes with OS in gastric cancer patients.
(A) In intestinal-type gastric cancer patients, the heterozygous variant genotype (AC) did not show significant association with survival outcomes; (B) In diffuse-type gastric cancer patients, individuals with the AC genotype had a significantly increased risk of death when compared with those carrying the homozygous variant genotypes (AA/CC). HR and 95% CIs were estimated using multivariate Cox regression model. Statistical differences between two survival curves were assessed by the log-rank test. Asterisks (*) indicates mean OS when median OS could not be calculated. †The log-rank P value less than 0.05 was corrected by a permutation test (n = 5000 random permutations) reported by Vasselli et al [17].
Figure 2Stratified analysis of MAP3K1 rs889312 genotypes associated with survival outcomes in diffuse-type gastric cancer patients.
Cox regression analysis of survival in patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer.
| MAP3K1 | HR (95% CI) | ||||||
| Univariate analysis |
| Multivariate analysis - Model 1 |
| Multivariate analysis - Model 2 |
| ||
|
|
| 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
|
| 1.31 (1.02–1.68) | 0.030 | 1.32 (1.03–1.69) | 0.028 | 1.34 (1.04–1.71) | 0.021 | |
Adjusted for sex, age, TNM stage, and differentiation status.
Adjusted for all covariates including sex, age, tumor location, differentiation, tumor size, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and TNM stage.
HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.