Literature DB >> 24759573

Reduced vergence adaptation is associated with a prolonged output of convergence accommodation in convergence insufficiency.

Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan1, William R Bobier2.   

Abstract

Convergence insufficiency (CI) is a developmental visual anomaly defined clinically by a reduced near point of convergence, a reduced capacity to view through base-out prisms (fusional convergence); coupled with asthenopic symptoms typically blur and diplopia. Experimental studies show reduced vergence parameters and tonic adaptation. Based upon current models of accommodation and vergence, we hypothesize that the reduced vergence adaptation in CI leads to excessive amounts of convergence accommodation (CA). Eleven CI participants (mean age=17.4±2.3 years) were recruited with reduced capacity to view through increasing magnitudes of base out (BO) prisms (mean fusional convergence at 40 cm=12±0.9Δ). Testing followed our previous experimental design for (n=11) binocularly normal adults. Binocular fixation of a difference of Gaussian (DoG) target (0.2 cpd) elicited CA responses during vergence adaptation to a 12Δ BO. Vergence and CA responses were obtained at 3 min intervals over a 15 min period and time course were quantified using exponential decay functions. Results were compared to previously published data on eleven binocular normals. Eight participants completed the study. CI's showed significantly reduced magnitude of vergence adaptation (CI: 2.9Δ vs. normals: 6.6Δ; p=0.01) and CA reduction (CI=0.21 D, Normals=0.55 D; p=0.03). However, the decay time constants for adaptation and CA responses were not significantly different. CA changes were not confounded by changes in tonic accommodation (Change in TA=0.01±0.2D; p=0.8). The reduced magnitude of vergence adaptation found in CI patients resulting in higher levels of CA may potentially explain their clinical findings of reduced positive fusional vergence (PFV) and the common symptom of blur.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthenopia; Convergence accommodation; Convergence insufficiency; Fusional vergence; Vergence adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24759573     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Binocular vision and abnormal head posture in children when watching television.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Wei-Hong Zhang; Shu-Zhen Dai; Hai-Ying Peng; Li-Ya Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Functional anatomy of human extraocular muscles during fusional divergence.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The Convergence Insufficiency Neuro-mechanism in Adult Population Study (CINAPS) Randomized Clinical Trial: Design, Methods, and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Mitchell Scheiman; Elio M Santos; Cristian Morales; Chang Yaramothu; John Vito D'Antonio-Bertagnolli; Bharat B Biswal; Suril Gohel; Xiaobo Li
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Objective Evaluation of Vergence Disorders and a Research-Based Novel Method for Vergence Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Aurélien Morize; François Daniel; Fabienne Jonqua; Christophe Orssaud; Dominique Brémond-Gignac
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Changes in stimulus and response AC/A ratio with vision therapy in Convergence Insufficiency.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar Singh; Revathy Mani; Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-01-24

6.  Deficient vergence prism adaptation in subjects with decompensated heterophoria.

Authors:  Anna Przekoracka-Krawczyk; Krzysztof Piotr Michalak; Paulina Pyżalska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Disparity vergence responses before versus after repetitive vergence therapy in binocularly normal controls.

Authors:  Henry Talasan; Mitchell Scheiman; Xiaobo Li; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Test-retest of a phoria adaptation stimulus-induced functional MRI experiment.

Authors:  Cristian Morales; Suril Gohel; Mitchell Scheiman; Xiaobo Li; Elio M Santos; Ayushi Sangoi; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Reflexive Fusional Vergence and Its Plasticity Are Impaired in Convergence Insufficiency.

Authors:  Ian M Erkelens; William R Bobier
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.