S Gouard1, A Pallardy2, J Gaschet1, A Faivre-Chauvet3, F Bruchertseifer4, A Morgenstern4, C Maurel1, E Matous1, F Kraeber-Bodéré3, F Davodeau1, M Chérel5. 1. INSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, France; University of Nantes, France; CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France. 2. INSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, France; University of Nantes, France; CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France; CHU Nantes, Nuclear medicine department, Nantes, France. 3. INSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, France; University of Nantes, France; CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France; CHU Nantes, Nuclear medicine department, Nantes, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France. 4. Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany. 5. INSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, France; University of Nantes, France; CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France. Electronic address: Michel.Cherel@univ-nantes.fr.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells within the bone marrow. Despite intense research to develop new treatments, cure is almost never achieved. Alpha-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been shown to be effective in vivo in a MM model. In order to define where alpha-RIT stands in MM treatment, the aim of this study was to compare Melphalan, MM standard treatment, with alpha-RIT using a [213Bi]-anti-mCD138 antibody in a syngeneic MM mouse model. METHODS: C57BL/KaLwRij mice were grafted with 1 × 10(6) 5T33 murine MM cells. Luciferase transfected 5T33 cells were used for in vivo localization. The first step of the study was to assess the dose-response of Melphalan 21 days after engraftment. The second step consisted in therapeutic combination: Melphalan followed by RIT at day 22 or day 25 after engraftment. Toxicity (animal weight, blood cell counts) and treatment efficacy were studied in animals receiving no treatment, injected with Melphalan alone, RIT alone at day 22 or day 25 (3.7 MBq of [213Bi]-anti-CD138) and Melphalan combined with alpha-RIT. RESULTS: Fifty percent of untreated mice died by day 63 after MM engraftment. In mice treated with Melphalan alone, only the 200 μg dose improved median survival. No animal was cured after Melphalan treatment whereas 60% of the mice survived with RIT alone at day 22 after tumor engraftment with only slight and reversible hematological radiotoxicity. No therapeutic effect was observed with alpha-RIT 25 days after engraftment. Melphalan and alpha-RIT combination does not improve overall survival compared to RIT alone, and results in increased leukocyte and red blood cell toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-RIT seems to be a good alternative to Melphalan. Association of these two treatments provides no benefit. The perspectives of this work would be to evaluate RIT impact on the regimens incorporating the novel agents bortezomide, thalidomide and lenalidomide.
INTRODUCTION:Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells within the bone marrow. Despite intense research to develop new treatments, cure is almost never achieved. Alpha-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been shown to be effective in vivo in a MM model. In order to define where alpha-RIT stands in MM treatment, the aim of this study was to compare Melphalan, MM standard treatment, with alpha-RIT using a [213Bi]-anti-mCD138 antibody in a syngeneic MM mouse model. METHODS: C57BL/KaLwRij mice were grafted with 1 × 10(6) 5T33 murine MM cells. Luciferase transfected 5T33 cells were used for in vivo localization. The first step of the study was to assess the dose-response of Melphalan 21 days after engraftment. The second step consisted in therapeutic combination: Melphalan followed by RIT at day 22 or day 25 after engraftment. Toxicity (animal weight, blood cell counts) and treatment efficacy were studied in animals receiving no treatment, injected with Melphalan alone, RIT alone at day 22 or day 25 (3.7 MBq of [213Bi]-anti-CD138) and Melphalan combined with alpha-RIT. RESULTS: Fifty percent of untreated mice died by day 63 after MM engraftment. In mice treated with Melphalan alone, only the 200 μg dose improved median survival. No animal was cured after Melphalan treatment whereas 60% of the mice survived with RIT alone at day 22 after tumor engraftment with only slight and reversible hematological radiotoxicity. No therapeutic effect was observed with alpha-RIT 25 days after engraftment. Melphalan and alpha-RIT combination does not improve overall survival compared to RIT alone, and results in increased leukocyte and red blood cell toxicity. CONCLUSIONS:Alpha-RIT seems to be a good alternative to Melphalan. Association of these two treatments provides no benefit. The perspectives of this work would be to evaluate RIT impact on the regimens incorporating the novel agents bortezomide, thalidomide and lenalidomide.
Authors: Narges K Tafreshi; Michael L Doligalski; Christopher J Tichacek; Darpan N Pandya; Mikalai M Budzevich; Ghassan El-Haddad; Nikhil I Khushalani; Eduardo G Moros; Mark L McLaughlin; Thaddeus J Wadas; David L Morse Journal: Molecules Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Gorin; Sébastien Gouard; Jérémie Ménager; Alfred Morgenstern; Frank Bruchertseifer; Alain Faivre-Chauvet; Yannick Guilloux; Michel Chérel; François Davodeau; Joëlle Gaschet Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2015-10-19