Literature DB >> 24759124

Impact of antihypertensive combination and monotreatments on blood pressure variability: assessment by old and new indices. Data from a large ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database.

Gianfranco Parati1, Eamon Dolan, Ludwin Ley, Helmut Schumacher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: High 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) variability is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. We analysed a large ABP monitoring database containing data from hypertensive patients treated with telmisartan/amlodipine combination or various monotherapies with the aim of quantifying the 24-h distribution of blood pressure (BP) reduction by treatment through the smoothness index and of developing and testing a new treatment-on-variability index (TOVI) to quantify the effects of treatment on both mean BP and BP variability.
METHODS: ABP data were pooled from 10 studies (N = 4294) with a median follow-up of 60 days. Smoothness index was calculated by dividing the mean of treatment-induced hourly BP reductions by its SD. TOVI was calculated as the ratio of the mean of hourly BP reductions to weighted 24-h BP SD (weighted mean of daytime and night-time SDs) under treatment.
RESULTS: The SBP/DBP smoothness index and TOVI values of telmisartan/amlodipine combination were significantly (P < 0.0001) higher (smoothness index: 1.81/1.51; TOVI: 2.71/2.13) compared with telmisartan 80  mg (smoothness index: 1.12/0.90; TOVI: 1.55/1.23), amlodipine 10  mg (smoothness index: 1.33/1.09; TOVI: 2.09/1.58), valsartan 160  mg (smoothness index: 1.01/0.81; TOVI: 1.35/1.07), ramipril 10  mg (smoothness index: 0.83/0.63; TOVI: 1.11/0.87) and placebo (smoothness index: 0.23/0.18; TOVI: 0.34/0.30), indicating a smoother 24-h BP reduction profile (higher smoothness index) as well as the achievement of significantly lower and smoother BP levels over 24  h (higher TOVI) with the combination.
CONCLUSION: As compared with various monotherapies, the telmisartan/amlodipine combination was associated with a smoother BP reduction over 24  h and with a more favourable balance between mean 24-h BP reduction and the degree of BP variability on treatment, reflecting both its effectiveness in lowering BP levels and its longer duration of action. The agreement between smoothness index and TOVI demonstrates that they are similarly effective in the differentiation of antihypertensive treatments, although providing conceptually different information, the clinical relevance of which needs to be tested by ad-hoc outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24759124     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  11 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Hypertension, Blood Pressure Variability, and Target Organ Lesion.

Authors:  Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen; Kátia De Angelis; Fernando Dos Santos; Daniela R Dartora; Bruno Rodrigues; Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; George S Stergiou; Eamon Dolan; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Effect of antihypertensive treatment on 24-h blood pressure variability: pooled individual data analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring studies based on olmesartan mono or combination treatment.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Kazuomi Kario; George Bakris; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Comparison of the Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan on Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Shin; Soohwa Song; Yeong Bae Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 6.  Blood Pressure Variability and Therapeutic Implications in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Chiara Nardin; Marcello Rattazzi; Paolo Pauletto
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-09-26

7.  Effect of a fixed-dose combination of Telmisartan/S-amlodipine on circadian blood pressure compared with Telmisartan monotherapy: TENUVA-BP study.

Authors:  Bong-Joon Kim; Kyoung-Im Cho; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Seung-Min Choi; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Sang Wook Lim; Seung-Jae Joo; Nam Ho Lee; Sang-Yup Lim; Seong-Hoon Lim; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2022-03-01

8.  Dose Timing of an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker/Calcium Channel Blocker Combination in Hypertensive Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario; Satoshi Hoshide; Kazuaki Uchiyama; Tetsuro Yoshida; Osamu Okazaki; Takao Noshiro; Hirotaka Aoki; Hiroyuki Mizuno; Yuri Matsumoto
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Fimasartan for independent reduction of blood pressure variability in mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Authors:  Mi-Seung Shin; Dae Ryong Kang; Changsoo Kim; Eun Joo Cho; Ki-Chul Sung; Seok-Min Kang; Dong-Soo Kim; Seung Jae Joo; Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung-Kuk Hwang; Jeong Bae Park
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Study on the Formation of Antihypertensive Twin Drugs by Caffeic Acid and Ferulic Acid with Telmisartan.

Authors:  Pengshou Li; Yingying Peng; Qixiang Ma; Ziyong Li; Xiaohua Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.