| Literature DB >> 24757628 |
Hamid Amoozgar1, Shirvan Salaminia2, Ahmad Ali Amirghofran3, Sirous Cheriki2, Mohammad Borzoee2, Gholamhossein Ajami2, Farah Peiravian4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Transposition of Great Arteries (TGA) is a serious congenital heart disease and anatomic correction in the first few weeks of life has revealed good outcomes nowadays. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the myocardial and valvular function at midterm postoperative follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, thirty-three patients with TGA and Arterial Switch Operation (ASO) were evaluated by 2-dimensional, M-mode, Doppler, and pulsed Tissue Doppler. These patients were compared with 33 healthy children of the same age and gender as the normal control group. Student's t-test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. Besides, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Function Tests; Surgical Procedures; Switch; Transposition of Great Vessels
Year: 2013 PMID: 24757628 PMCID: PMC3987440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Cardiovasc Res J ISSN: 2251-9130
Operative and Postoperative Clinical Data in the Patients Group
| Variable | mean±SD |
|---|---|
| Operation time (hour) | 5.15±0.72 |
| Cardiopulmonary bypass time (minute) | 126.98±31.83 |
| Aortic cross clamp time (minutes) | 86.48±13.51 |
| Intensive care admission times (hour) | 105±32 |
| Need for mechanical ventilation (hour) | 62.5±87.58 |
| Total admission time (day) | 8.1±4.82 |
| Need for re-intubation | 3 (n) |
Figure 1.Error Bars Graph of Mean Aortic Annulus Measurements at: (Aorta 1) True Annulus, (Aorta 2) Sinus, and (Aorta 3) Sinotubular Junction of the Patients (2) and the Control Group (1)
Comparison of the Patients and Controls Regarding M-Mode Echocardiographic Parameters
| M -mode | Patients | Control (mean±SD) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVSd (Cm) | 0.66±0.18 | 0.67±0.19 | 0.770 |
| IVSS (Cm) | 0.89±0.25 | 0.84±0.2 | 0.421 |
| LVIDd (Cm) | 3.01±0.84 | 3.15±0.54 | 0.464 |
| LVIDs (Cm) | 1.52±0.53 | 1.77±0.32 | 0.034 |
| LVPWd (Cm) | 0.56±0.12 | 0.52±0.15 | 0.210 |
| LVPWS (Cm) | 0.72±0.15 | 0.68±0.19 | 0.377 |
| EDV (Cm3) | 32.46±17.3 | 40.43±16.2 | 0.071 |
| ESV (Cm3) | 8.61±4.97 | 9.86±4.56 | 0.338 |
| EF (%) | 73.78±8.67 | 75.51±5.72 | 0.352 |
| SV (Cm3/s) | 24.96±12 | 30.40±12.5 | 0.100 |
| FS (%) | 41.93±8 | 43.42±5.62 | 0.401 |
Abbreviations:LVSID, Left ventricular systolic diameter; LVEDd, Left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVESV, Left ventricular end systolic volume; LVPWS, Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at systole; LVPWd, Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at diastole; ESV, end systolic volume; FS ,Fractional shortening; EF ,ejection fraction
Comparison of the Patients and Controls Regarding Pulse Doppler Echocardiographic Indexes
| Patients (mean±SD) | Control (mean±SD) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ET (cm/s) | 0.72±0.26 | 0.66±0.14 | 0.301 |
| AT (cm/s) | 0.68±0.19 | 0.48±0.16 | 0.000 |
| EM (cm/s) | 1.01±0.23 | 1.05±0.17 | 0.422 |
| AM (cm/s) | 0.68±0.28 | 0.57±0.13 | 0.041 |
|
ET | 1.15±0.56 | 1.48±0.45 | 0.532 |
| EM to AM | 2.52±5.4 | 1.90±0.47 | 0.011 |
Abbreviations: ET, Early velocity of tricuspid valve; AT, Atrial contraction velocity of tricuspid; EM, Early velocity of mitral valve; AM, Atrial contraction velocity of tricuspid
Comparison of the Patients and Controls Regarding Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic Indexes
| Patients group | Control group (mean±SD) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tricuspid | |||
| S (m/s) | 0.08±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | <0.001 |
| Ea (m/s) | 0.12±0.03 | 0.150.02 | <0.001 |
| Aa (m/s) | 0.09±0.03 | 0.12±0.03 | < 0.001 |
| Septum | |||
| S (m/s) | 0.05±0.02 | 0.07±0.01 | < 0.001 |
| Ea (m/s) | 0.12±0.02 | 0.13±0.03 | 0.05 |
| Aa (m/s) | 0.08±0.02 | 0.08±0.02 | 0.55 |
| Mitral | |||
| S (m/s) | 0.07±0.02 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.42 |
| Ea (m/s) | 0.13±0.03 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.14 |
| Aa (m/s) | 0.07±0.02 | 0.07±0.02 | 0.40 |
Abbreviations: S, Systolic velocity; Ea, early diastolic velocity; Aa, atrial contraction velocity