| Literature DB >> 24757386 |
Tomoyuki Furuta1, Kanako Uehara1, Rosalyn B Angeles-Shim1, Junghyun Shim1, Motoyuki Ashikari1, Tomonori Takashi2.
Abstract
The wild relatives of rice (Oryza sativa L.) are useful sources of alleles that have evolved to adapt in diverse environments around the world. Oryza rufipogon, the known progenitor of the cultivated rice, harbors genes that have been lost in cultivated varieties through domestication or evolution. This makes O. rufipogon an ideal source of value-added traits that can be utilized to improve the existing rice cultivars. To explore the potential of the rice progenitor as a genetic resource for improving O. sativa, 33 chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) of O. rufipogon (W0106) in the background of the elite japonica cultivar Koshihikari were developed and evaluated for several agronomic traits. Over 90% of the entire genome was introgressed from the donor parent into the CSSLs. A total of 99 putative QTLs were detected, of which 15 were identified as major effective QTLs that have significantly large effects on the traits examined. Among the 15 major effective QTLs, a QTL on chromosome 10 showed a remarkable positive effect on the number of grains per panicle. Comparison of the putative QTLs identified in this study and previous studies indicated a wide genetic diversity between O. rufipogon accessions.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza rufipogon; QTL mapping; chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs)
Year: 2014 PMID: 24757386 PMCID: PMC3949583 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.63.468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1Breeding scheme used for developing RSLs carrying O. rufipogon (W0106) chromosome segments in O. sativa L. cv. Koshihikari genetic background. MAS indicate that plants with optimal genotypes were selected by marker assisted selection. Numbers in parenthesis denote the number of lines subjected to MAS. Boxed numbers represent the numbers of candidate RSLs selected by MAS. Numbers in brackets indicate the total number of RSLs derived from the preceding backcross generation.
Fig. 2Graphical representation of the genotypes of the 33 RSLs. Black bars and white bars represent homozygous segments from O. rufipogon and O. sativa, respectively. The gray bar indicates a heterozygous segment of O. rufipogon and O. sativa. The SNP markers used in marker-assisted selection are indicated as SP series. Numbers in parenthesis indicates the physical distance (Mb) of each SNP markers from the upper end of each chromosome.
Morphometric measurements for different agronomic traits of 33 RSLs carrying chromosome segments from O. rufipogon
| Chr. No. | Lines | Days-to-heading (days) | Culm length (cm) | Panicle length (cm) | Number of primary branches/panicle | Number of grains/panicle | Grain length (mm) | Grain width (mm) | Grain thickness (mm) | 100-grain weight (g) | Fertility (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koshihikari | 94.80 | 89.32 | 18.08 | 11.40 | 116.00 | 7.31 | 3.21 | 2.14 | 2.23 | 95.92 | |
| 1 | RSL1 | 92.00 | 75.56 | 19.56 | 12.40 | 158.00 | 7.34 | 3.26 | 2.17 | 2.23 | 94.28 |
| 1 | RSL2 | 91.60 | 80.76 | 20.48 | 12.40 | 138.80 | 7.41 | 3.36 | 2.25 | 2.37 | 96.04 |
| 1 | RSL3 | 94.80 | 90.08 | 18.74 | 10.60 | 112.40 | 7.32 | 3.16 | 2.14 | 2.25 | 97.20 |
| 1 | RSL4 | 98.00 | 91.72 | 20.55 | 10.00 | 108.50 | 7.42 | 3.30 | 2.20 | 2.50 | 92.13 |
| 1 | RSL5 | 96.00 | 82.00 | 19.16 | 10.60 | 100.00 | 7.30 | 3.24 | 2.17 | 2.26 | 95.24 |
| 2 | RSL6 | 95.60 | 70.44 | 18.24 | 9.80 | 123.20 | 7.29 | 3.17 | 2.05 | 2.08 | 94.96 |
| 2 | RSL7 | 93.20 | 72.24 | 18.26 | 10.80 | 135.20 | 7.34 | 2.92 | 2.13 | 2.00 | 91.84 |
| 2 | RSL8 | 96.40 | 84.84 | 18.14 | 11.00 | 131.80 | 7.03 | 2.88 | 2.09 | 1.91 | 90.74 |
| 3 | RSL9 | 100.00 | 82.08 | 20.30 | 11.60 | 100.00 | 8.44 | 3.17 | 2.13 | 2.38 | 84.24 |
| 3 | RSL10 | 117.80 | 70.68 | 19.06 | 10.20 | 88.80 | 7.35 | 3.33 | 2.10 | 2.13 | 76.32 |
| 4 | RSL11 | 95.60 | 83.80 | 18.58 | 10.20 | 113.40 | 7.45 | 3.26 | 2.21 | 2.28 | 93.36 |
| 4 | RSL12 | 95.80 | 88.00 | 17.02 | 8.80 | 81.00 | 7.39 | 3.36 | 2.22 | 2.49 | 91.54 |
| 5 | RSL13 | 96.40 | 81.32 | 19.12 | 11.40 | 120.40 | 7.29 | 3.26 | 2.22 | 2.30 | 95.96 |
| 5 | RSL14 | 92.60 | 79.28 | 19.58 | 10.60 | 134.00 | 7.57 | 2.88 | 2.07 | 2.00 | 95.66 |
| 5 | RSL15 | 94.00 | 94.28 | 21.08 | 11.00 | 119.20 | 7.73 | 3.30 | 2.25 | 2.55 | 87.20 |
| 6 | RSL16 | 116.00 | 93.48 | 20.32 | 11.60 | 123.40 | 7.43 | 3.31 | 2.15 | 2.23 | 79.80 |
| 6 | RSL17 | 97.00 | 100.56 | 21.10 | 13.20 | 157.20 | 7.38 | 3.24 | 2.15 | 2.23 | 94.18 |
| 7 | RSL18 | 95.20 | 88.52 | 19.42 | 12.00 | 122.40 | 7.16 | 3.37 | 2.22 | 2.32 | 94.54 |
| 7 | RSL19 | 105.80 | 90.80 | 19.96 | 13.20 | 128.40 | 7.29 | 3.39 | 2.16 | 2.25 | 88.48 |
| 7 | RSL20 | 98.40 | 88.20 | 20.42 | 10.40 | 107.60 | 7.66 | 3.44 | 2.17 | 2.44 | 90.88 |
| 8 | RSL21 | 104.00 | 83.00 | 20.56 | 11.20 | 112.20 | 7.77 | 3.41 | 2.08 | 2.16 | 89.76 |
| 8 | RSL22 | 94.00 | 80.48 | 18.86 | 10.20 | 113.40 | 7.43 | 3.43 | 2.19 | 2.38 | 93.82 |
| 8 | RSL23 | 102.60 | 90.68 | 18.70 | 9.60 | 108.60 | 7.81 | 3.40 | 2.09 | 2.28 | 92.32 |
| 9 | RSL24 | 94.00 | 77.92 | 19.44 | 10.40 | 117.00 | 7.28 | 3.23 | 2.08 | 2.18 | 90.78 |
| 9 | RSL25 | 95.40 | 75.08 | 18.12 | 10.60 | 96.40 | 7.20 | 3.24 | 2.08 | 2.07 | 94.44 |
| 9 | RSL26 | 95.20 | 76.72 | 18.62 | 10.60 | 107.40 | 7.33 | 3.32 | 2.07 | 2.12 | 87.80 |
| 10 | RSL27 | 101.60 | 36.56 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 6.84 | 2.87 | 2.08 | 1.77 | N.D. |
| 10 | RSL28 | 94.60 | 82.08 | 21.06 | 11.80 | 170.40 | 7.51 | 3.42 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 97.86 |
| 10 | RSL29 | 93.40 | 77.28 | 19.24 | 11.80 | 126.80 | 7.32 | 3.31 | 2.15 | 2.21 | 93.16 |
| 11 | RSL30 | 93.60 | 75.48 | 19.08 | 11.00 | 117.40 | 7.68 | 3.35 | 2.17 | 2.33 | 96.60 |
| 11 | RSL31 | 93.60 | 77.76 | 20.56 | 11.60 | 136.60 | 7.26 | 3.35 | 2.11 | 2.16 | 93.94 |
| 12 | RSL32 | 97.40 | 87.48 | 18.58 | 11.80 | 102.80 | 7.49 | 3.39 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 96.14 |
| 12 | RSL33 | 96.20 | 84.16 | 18.86 | 11.40 | 130.40 | 7.06 | 3.25 | 2.12 | 1.92 | 7.28 |
significantly higher than Koshihikari,
significantly lower than Koshihikari,
outlier in the boxplot (Fig. 3)
siginificance calculated at P < 0.05. b values shown are means of 5 samples.
Fig. 3Boxplots of the mean values for each trait. Boxplots for all traits measured in this study were shown. Dots in boxplots indicate outliers showing mean values that are significantly different from others. These outliers were identified as RSLs that have a chromosome segment harboring a major effective QTL derived from O. rufipogon.
Comparison of the major effective QTLs identified in this study with previously reported QTLs from O. rufipogon
| Trait | CSSL | Chr. | Start positiion | End position | Effect | QTL | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days-to-heading | RSL10 | 3 | 24,488,442 | End | 24.3% ↑ | ||
| RSL16 | 6 | End | 10,671,175 | 22.4% ↑ | dth6.1 | 1 | |
| RSL19 | 7 | 3,898,132 | 17,327,528 | 11.6% ↑ | dth7.1 | 2, 3, 4, 6 | |
|
| |||||||
| Culm length | RSL27 | 10 | End | 3,552,082 | 59.1% ↓ | ph10.1 | 3 |
|
| |||||||
| Grain number | RSL28 | 10 | 2,541,199 | 17,555,159 | 46.9% ↑ | ||
|
| |||||||
| Grain length | RSL9 | 3 | 57,726 | 24,488,442 | 15.5% ↑ | gl3 | 5 |
| RSL23 | 8 | 23,167,567 | End | 6.8% ↑ | |||
| RSL27 | 10 | End | 3,552,082 | 6.4% ↓ | |||
|
| |||||||
| Grain width | RSL7 | 2 | 9,256,584 | 27,919,903 | 9.0% ↓ | ||
| RSL8 | 2 | 9,256,584 | End | 10.3% ↓ | |||
| RSL14 | 5 | 3,173,133 | 7,305,956 | 10.3% ↓ | qSW5 | 6 | |
| RSL27 | 10 | End | 3,552,082 | 10.6% ↓ | |||
|
| |||||||
| Fertility | RSL10 | 3 | 24,488,442 | End | 20.4% ↓ | pss3.1 | 1, 4 |
| RSL16 | 6 | End | 10,671,175 | 16.8% ↓ | pss6.1 | 4 | |
| RSL33 | 12 | 17,499,935 | End | 92.4% ↓ | |||
↑ and ↓ indicate an increase or a decrease in the trait value compared to Koshihikari, respectively.
Names of QTLs reported in previous studies.
Reference numbers are as follows; 1 Xiao , 2 Moncada , 3 Septiningsih , 4 Thomson , 5 Lee , 6 Onishi .