Literature DB >> 24756991

Ebullitive methane emissions from oxygenated wetland streams.

John T Crawford1, Emily H Stanley, Seth A Spawn, Jacques C Finlay, Luke C Loken, Robert G Striegl.   

Abstract

Stream and river carbon dioxide emissions are an important component of the global carbon cycle. Methane emissions from streams could also contribute to regional or global greenhouse gas cycling, but there are relatively few data regarding stream and river methane emissions. Furthermore, the available data do not typically include the ebullitive (bubble-mediated) pathway, instead focusing on emission of dissolved methane by diffusion or convection. Here, we show the importance of ebullitive methane emissions from small streams in the regional greenhouse gas balance of a lake and wetland-dominated landscape in temperate North America and identify the origin of the methane emitted from these well-oxygenated streams. Stream methane flux densities from this landscape tended to exceed those of nearby wetland diffusive fluxes as well as average global wetland ebullitive fluxes. Total stream ebullitive methane flux at the regional scale (103 Mg C yr(-1) ; over 6400 km(2) ) was of the same magnitude as diffusive methane flux previously documented at the same scale. Organic-rich stream sediments had the highest rates of bubble release and higher enrichment of methane in bubbles, but glacial sand sediments also exhibited high bubble emissions relative to other studied environments. Our results from a database of groundwater chemistry support the hypothesis that methane in bubbles is produced in anoxic near-stream sediment porewaters, and not in deeper, oxygenated groundwaters. Methane interacts with other key elemental cycles such as nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur, which has implications for ecosystem changes such as drought and increased nutrient loading. Our results support the contention that streams, particularly those draining wetland landscapes of the northern hemisphere, are an important component of the global methane cycle.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; ebullition; methane; rivers; upscaling; wetlands

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24756991     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Methane Ebullition in Temperate Hydropower Reservoirs and Implications for US Policy on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Authors:  Benjamin L Miller; Evan V Arntzen; Amy E Goldman; Marshall C Richmond
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of methane ebullition in lowland headwater streams and the impact on sampling design.

Authors:  Andrew L Robison; Wilfred M Wollheim; Bonnie Turek; Cynthia Bova; Carter Snay; Ruth K Varner
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.019

3.  Riverbed methanotrophy sustained by high carbon conversion efficiency.

Authors:  Mark Trimmer; Felicity C Shelley; Kevin J Purdy; Susanna T Maanoja; Panagiota-Myrsini Chronopoulou; Jonathan Grey; Grey Jonathan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Methane-derived carbon in the benthic food web in stream impoundments.

Authors:  John Gichimu Mbaka; Celia Somlai; Denis Köpfer; Andreas Maeck; Andreas Lorke; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Thermal sensitivity of CO2 and CH4 emissions varies with streambed sediment properties.

Authors:  Sophie A Comer-Warner; Paul Romeijn; Daren C Gooddy; Sami Ullah; Nicholas Kettridge; Benjamin Marchant; David M Hannah; Stefan Krause
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Integrating landscape system and meta-ecosystem frameworks to advance the understanding of ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes: An analysis on the carbon fluxes in the Northern Highlands Lake District (NHLD) of Wisconsin and Michigan.

Authors:  Haile Yang; Jiakuan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.