Literature DB >> 24756915

Association between adjuvant regional radiotherapy and cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with conservation therapy.

Osamu Shibayama1, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi, Masatoshi Inagaki, Yutaka Matsuoka, Eisho Yoshikawa, Yuriko Sugawara, Tatsuo Akechi, Noriaki Wada, Shigeru Imoto, Koji Murakami, Asao Ogawa, Akira Akabayashi, Yosuke Uchitomi.   

Abstract

Although protracted cognitive impairment has been reported to occur after radiotherapy even when such therapy is not directed to brain areas, the mechanism remains unclear. This study investigated whether breast cancer patients exposed to local radiotherapy showed lower cognitive function mediated by higher plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels than those unexposed. We performed the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) and measured plasma IL-6 levels for 105 breast cancer surgical patients within 1 year after the initial therapy. The group differences in each of the indices of WMS-R were investigated between cancer patients exposed to adjuvant regional radiotherapy (n = 51) and those unexposed (n = 54) using analysis of covariance. We further investigated a mediation effect by plasma IL-6 levels on the relationship between radiotherapy and the indices of WMS-R using the bootstrapping method. The radiotherapy group showed significantly lower Immediate Verbal Memory Index and Delayed Recall Index (P = 0.001, P = 0.008, respectively). Radiotherapy exerted an indirect effect on the lower Delayed Recall Index of WMS-R through elevation of plasma IL-6 levels (bootstrap 95% confidence interval = -2.6626 to -0.0402). This study showed that breast cancer patients exposed to adjuvant regional radiotherapy in conservation therapy might have cognitive impairment even several months after their treatment. The relationship between the therapy and the cognitive impairment could be partially mediated by elevation of plasma IL-6 levels.
© 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; cognitive impairment; interleukin-6; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24756915      PMCID: PMC4101762          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


Introduction

As therapies for cancers improve survival time of patients with cancers, protracted cognitive impairment in cancer patients, who do not have tumors in the central nervous system (CNS) and have not had direct therapy to the CNS, has received growing interest in recent years because such impairment often imposes an adverse impact on the quality of life (QOLs) of cancer patients and survivors 1,2. Recently, cognitive impairment accompanied by radiotherapy not directed to brain areas has been reported. Although Browall et al. found no association between such radiotherapy and cognitive function 3, several studies suggested some association between such radiotherapy and cognitive impairment. While some of these studies suggested that cognitive function recovered during radiotherapy or shortly after radiotherapy 4–6, others suggested that cognitive impairment persisted several months or even several years after radiotherapy 7–12. There were problems with the data interpretation in some of the previous studies. First, many of these studies did not have control groups 3–6,9, or the control groups were not cancer patients 7,10,11. In addition, most previous studies did not perform any objective neuropsychological tests 3–6,8. With regard to the mechanism of cognitive impairment associated with radiotherapy, several studies suggested that even local radiotherapy induced inflammation and elevated circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines 13–21. The association of proinflammatory cytokines and cognitive impairment is often referred to in the context of “sickness behavior,” which is a constellation of physiological, behavioral, and neuropsychological symptoms accompanied by conditions which induce inflammation, such as infection and cancer 22,23. In this connection, two clinical studies suggested an association between circulating proinflammatory cytokines and cognitive impairment in cancer patients, and they indicated that only the level of interleukin (IL)-6, among proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α, had a negative correlation with either cognitive function 24 or cognitive functioning QOL 25, while other proinflammatory cytokine levels had no correlation with it 24,25. Therefore, the elevation of circulating IL-6 levels may be one of the factors important in cognitive impairment in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Accordingly, we hypothesized that one of the mechanisms of cognitive impairment accompanied by radiotherapy not directed to brain areas was that irradiation induces inflammation and elevates circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines, and among these cytokines, IL-6 plays an important role and leads to cognitive impairment. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether among non-CNS cancer patients, patients who had undergone local radiotherapy to areas other than brain showed lower cognitive function as assessed by objective neuropsychological tests than patients who had not undergone radiotherapy, and whether elevation of plasma IL-6 levels mediated the cognitive function decline in those patients receiving radiotherapy.

Material and Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center of Japan and was performed after obtaining written informed consent from patients. This study was conducted as a secondary analysis using a database of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from breast cancer survivors 26.

Subjects and procedures

Subjects were recruited during follow-up visits to the Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, after their first breast cancer surgery at the same division. We analyzed their medical charts in continuous sampling and asked the patients who met the inclusion criteria to participate in the study within 3–15 months after their surgery and 1 year after the end of their initial therapy. The patients chosen were (1) women and (2) aged between 18 and 55 years, and did not conflict with the exclusion criteria of (1) a history of cancer other than breast cancer, (2) bilateral breast cancer, (3) clear evidence of residual, recurrent, or metastatic cancer, (4) current chemotherapy or radiotherapy, (5) a history of any neurological disorders, traumatic brain injury, or psychiatric disorders other than affective and anxiety disorders, (6) psychotropic medication taken within 1 month before participation in the study, (7) a history of substance abuse or dependence, (8) a family history of early dementia, (9) any physical symptoms that interfered with daily life, (10) possible dementia defined as a score of <24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination 27,28, (11) a history of major depression and/or posttraumatic stress disorder before inspection for cancer diagnosis, and (12) any contraindication to undergoing an MRI scan. The surgeries were performed from March 1998 to August 2001. Among them, the patients who could be contacted and agreed to participate in the study were interviewed to screen for the exclusion criteria, and the patients who were not excluded received neuropsychological tests, blood sampling, the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV (SCID) 29, and a brain MRI. The subjects who were not excluded by the exclusion criteria on the SCID and by the MRI data were analyzed (Fig. 1) 26.
Figure 1

This flowchart illustrates subject sampling in this study. SCID, the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

This flowchart illustrates subject sampling in this study. SCID, the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder. The reason why the age for the inclusion criteria was 55 years or under is as follows: a meta-analysis indicated that the prevalence of dementia increases sharply after the age of 65 years 30, and a 14-year follow-up study indicated that the first decline in cognitive performance appears as early as about 10 years before dementia 31. Therefore, in order to exclude the variance of cognitive function associated with dementia as much as possible, we decided that the age of the subjects for this study was 55 years or under.

Adjuvant regional radiotherapy in breast conservation therapy

Radiotherapy was performed on the remaining breast after breast conservation therapy in the Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East. The method of irradiation for breast conservation therapy followed the clinical practice guideline of breast cancer published by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society 32: 50 Gy tangential irradiation given in 25 treatments to the remaining breast tissue was performed with a radiation source 6 MV X-ray, and in the cases where the resection margin was 5 mm or under from the tumor histopathology, a boost of 10 Gy irradiation was given in five treatments to the tumor bed with a radiation source 6 MeV electron beam.

Neuropsychological tests

The Japanese version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) 33,34 was performed. WMS-R consists of indices of Attention/Concentration, Immediate Verbal Memory, Immediate Visual Memory, and Delayed Recall to evaluate memory function 35.

Plasma IL-6 levels

Blood samples were collected from a peripheral vein into ethylenediaminetetraacetate-2Na tubes and immediately centrifuged at 4°C and 2300g for 10 min, and the plasma components were separated and stored at −80°C until analyses. Plasma IL-6 levels were analyzed by automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Lumipulse-F, Fujirebio Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Coefficients of variation in measurements were 2.2–3.8%, and the coefficient of correlation with measurements by traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by the same company was 0.99 or above 36.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). α levels were all set at P < 0.05 (two-tailed). The group differences in each of the demographic or medical factors were compared between the cancer patients exposed to radiotherapy and those not exposed, by using either the Student t test, Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 test or the Fisher's exact test. The group differences in each of the indices of WMS-R were compared between the cancer patients exposed to radiotherapy and those not exposed, using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age, education, accumulated alcohol consumption, smoking status, and body mass index (BMI), which were reported to be associated with impaired cognitive performance 37. In order to investigate a mediation effect by plasma IL-6 levels on the relationship between radiotherapy and the indices of WMS-R, the sizes of the indirect effects of receiving radiotherapy on the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels were estimated, using a bias-corrected bootstrapping method 38 with 5000 replications, and bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained. The outcome variable was each of the indices of WMS-R, the independent variable was whether the patient was exposed to radiotherapy or not, and the mediator was the plasma IL-6 levels. We further controlled for age, education, accumulated alcohol consumption, smoking status, and BMI (see Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Illustration of a mediation model 38, which hypothesizes that radiotherapy exerts an indirect effect on each of the indices of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) through plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels. Path a represents the effect of radiotherapy on plasma IL-6 levels, the proposed mediator. Path b represents the effect of plasma IL-6 levels on each of the indices of WMS-R partialling out the effect of radiotherapy. Path c' is the direct effect of radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R partialling out the effect of plasma IL-6 levels. The indirect effect of radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels is the product of a and b, which is tested with the bootstrap confidence interval (CI) obtained through the bootstrapping method.

Illustration of a mediation model 38, which hypothesizes that radiotherapy exerts an indirect effect on each of the indices of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) through plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels. Path a represents the effect of radiotherapy on plasma IL-6 levels, the proposed mediator. Path b represents the effect of plasma IL-6 levels on each of the indices of WMS-R partialling out the effect of radiotherapy. Path c' is the direct effect of radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R partialling out the effect of plasma IL-6 levels. The indirect effect of radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels is the product of a and b, which is tested with the bootstrap confidence interval (CI) obtained through the bootstrapping method. In this study, because clinical stage, surgical type, and lymphadectomy had strong correlations with radiotherapy, they were excluded from nuisance values because of multicollinearity (see Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic or medical background information in the group of patients exposed to their radiotherapy and in the group of patients unexposed

Received radiotherapy (n = 51)Not received radiotherapy (n = 54)P
Age, mean ± SD, year47.0 ± 5.246.6 ± 6.20.755
Handedness: right-handedness, no. (%)49 (96.1)53 (98.1)0.611
Hight, mean ± SD, cm156.9 ± 6.5156.0 ± 5.20.432
Weight, mean ± SD, kg56.9 ± 9.054.9 ± 6.30.196
BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m223.1 ± 3.422.5 ± 2.40.333
Education, mean ± SD, year13.1 ± 1.913.2 ± 1.80.797
Smoking, no. (%)8 (15.7)3 (5.6)0.116
Accumulated alcohol consumption, mean ± SD, kg38.4 ± 60.427.9 ± 84.60.043
Postmenopausal, no. (%)29 (56.9)31 (57.4)1.000
PS: 0, no. (%)35 (71.4)138 (70.4)1.000
Clinical stage: 0–I, no. (%)25 (49.0)13 (24.1)0.014
Lymphnode metastasis: positive, no. (%)15 (29.4)18 (33.3)0.824
Histological type, no. (%)
 Carcinoma in situ4 (7.8)2 (3.7)0.428
 Invasive carcinoma39 (76.5)44 (81.5)0.696
 Special type8 (15.7)8 (14.8)1.000
Histological grade: poor, no. (%)14 (27.5)14 (25.9)1.000
Surgical type: partial mastectomy, no. (%)51 (100.0)6 (11.1)0.000†††
Axillary lymphadectomy, no. (%)26 (51.0)44 (81.5)0.002††
Days after surgery, mean ± SD, day304 ± 101270 ± 1050.102
Radiotherapy: boost irradiation, no. (%)20 (39.2)NANA
Days after radiotherapy, mean ± SD, day226 ± 100NANA
Chemotherapy, no. (%)25 (49.0)26 (48.1)1.000
Hormonal therapy, no. (%)17 (33.3)15 (27.8)0.685

NA, not applicable; BMI, body mass index; PS, performance status.

Two missing values were excluded.

Significant difference (P < 0.05) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Significant difference (P < 0.01) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Significant difference (P < 0.001) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Demographic or medical background information in the group of patients exposed to their radiotherapy and in the group of patients unexposed NA, not applicable; BMI, body mass index; PS, performance status. Two missing values were excluded. Significant difference (P < 0.05) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group. Significant difference (P < 0.01) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group. Significant difference (P < 0.001) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Results

Demographic or medical background

Table 1 shows the demographic and medical background data of each group. The subjects consisted of 51 exposed to adjuvant radiotherapy and 54 no-radiotherapy patients (Fig. 1). Because the patients who were exposed to radiotherapy had all chosen breast conservation therapy, their clinical stage was significantly less advanced, and the proportion of patients who underwent axillary lymphadectomy was significantly smaller than that in the no-radiotherapy group. In addition, accumulated alcohol consumption was significantly greater in the group exposed to radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy and WMS-R

When the difference in each of the indices of WMS-R was compared between the radiotherapy group and the no-radiotherapy group controlling for age, education, accumulated alcohol consumption, smoking status, and BMI, the radiotherapy group showed a significantly lower Immediate Verbal Memory Index and a Delayed Recall Index (radiotherapy group vs. the no-radiotherapy group: 94.9 ± 12.4 vs. 103.6 ± 13.9, P = 0.001; 98.5 ± 10.6 vs. 104.3 ± 11.4, P = 0.008, respectively. Table 2).
Table 2

Each of the indices of WMS-R in the group of patients exposed to their radiotherapy and in the group of patients unexposed

Received radiotherapy (n = 51)Not received radiotherapy (n = 54)P
WMS-R index, mean ± SD
 Attention/concentration97.4 ± 13.2101.4 ± 10.310.238
 Verbal memory94.9 ± 12.4103.6 ± 13.910.001†††
 Visual memory102.2 ± 9.9102.4 ± 13.320.989
 Delayed recall98.5 ± 10.6104.3 ± 11.430.008††

WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.

One missing value was excluded.

Two missing values were excluded.

Three missing values were excluded.

Significant difference (P < 0.01) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Significant difference (P < 0.001) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Each of the indices of WMS-R in the group of patients exposed to their radiotherapy and in the group of patients unexposed WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. One missing value was excluded. Two missing values were excluded. Three missing values were excluded. Significant difference (P < 0.01) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group. Significant difference (P < 0.001) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.

Indirect effect of radiotherapy on WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels

When the size of the indirect effect of receiving radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels was estimated controlling for age, education, accumulated alcohol consumption, smoking status, and BMI, the bootstrap 95% CI of Delayed Recall Index only did not include zero (bootstrap 95% CI = −2.6626 to −0.0402), which indicated that the indirect effect was significant (Table 3).
Table 3

Regression coefficients between each pair of variables in the mediation models through which indirect effects of receiving radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels were estimated (Fig. 2), and bootstrap 95% CIs obtained through the bootstrapping method evaluating these indirect effects

WMS-R indexa1b1c'1Bootstrap 95% CI
Attention/concentration20.8174−1.0133−1.4550−3.2207 to 0.1191
Verbal memory20.8174−0.5331−7.2741††−2.1231 to 0.3055
Visual memory30.8173−0.37651.3768−1.7209 to 0.3672
Delayed recall40.8138−1.1678−4.6102−2.6626 to −0.0402

WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; IL-6, interleukin-6; CI, confidence interval.

Regression coefficient between each pair of variables corresponding with each symbol representing each path in Figure 2.

The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 96 patients (received radiotherapy 49 and not received 47) were available for analysis.

The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 95 patients (received radiotherapy 48 and not received 47) were available for analysis.

The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 94 patients (received radiotherapy 47 and not received 47) were available for analysis.

P < 0.05.

P < 0.01.

The indirect effect mentioned was significant at α level P < 0.05.

Regression coefficients between each pair of variables in the mediation models through which indirect effects of receiving radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels were estimated (Fig. 2), and bootstrap 95% CIs obtained through the bootstrapping method evaluating these indirect effects WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; IL-6, interleukin-6; CI, confidence interval. Regression coefficient between each pair of variables corresponding with each symbol representing each path in Figure 2. The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 96 patients (received radiotherapy 49 and not received 47) were available for analysis. The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 95 patients (received radiotherapy 48 and not received 47) were available for analysis. The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 94 patients (received radiotherapy 47 and not received 47) were available for analysis. P < 0.05. P < 0.01. The indirect effect mentioned was significant at α level P < 0.05.

Discussion

This study showed that breast cancer patients exposed to adjuvant regional radiotherapy in breast conservation therapy at 7 months after treatment showed a significantly lower Immediate Verbal Memory Index and a Delayed Recall Index of WMS-R than breast cancer patients not exposed to radiotherapy. We also found that radiotherapy exerted an indirect effect on the lower Delayed Recall Index of WMS-R through elevation of plasma IL-6 levels. These results suggested that adjuvant regional radiotherapy in breast conservation therapy could impair memory function some months after completion of the therapy, and that the influence of the therapy on the impairment of memory function is partially mediated by elevation of plasma IL-6 levels. There have been three studies on the relationship between radiotherapy and cognitive function by objective neuropsychological tests in breast cancer patients. One study was cross-sectional showing significantly lower attention and complex cognition in the Trail Making Test in the patient group exposed to radiotherapy than that in the non-cancer control group 7. Another study was longitudinal from before and up to 3 months after radiotherapy and showed a decline from baseline in verbal memory in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test 11. The third study was longitudinal at 6 months and at 36 months after radiotherapy showing a significantly smaller improvement in processing speed and significantly lower executive function on a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III at both time points in the patient group exposed to radiotherapy than that in the non-cancer control group 10. The results of this study using WMS-R (Table 2) generally support these findings. However, this study had an advantage over these previous studies because the previous studies did not have a control group consisting of breast cancer patients who had not been exposed to radiotherapy. Therefore, this study provided more compelling evidence that cognitive impairment was caused by radiotherapy, not by cancer itself and/or by treatments other than radiotherapy. This study suggested that adjuvant regional radiotherapy in breast conservation therapy might elevate plasma IL-6 levels as a byproduct of the analysis of the indirect effect of radiotherapy on the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels (Table 3), although the relation between radiotherapy for cancer patients and the levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines after radiotherapy has been inconsistent in previous studies, that is, some studies showed elevated levels after irradiation 16,20, but others showed the opposite results 4,14,21,39. The mechanism for the elevation of plasma IL-6 levels is not known and should be investigated in future studies. It may be added that the clinical stage was significantly less advanced in the radiotherapy group than that in the no-radiotherapy group in this study (Table 1). Thus, the possibility that advanced clinical stages influenced prolongation of high level of plasma IL-6 after radiotherapy seems to be low in this study. This study showed that radiotherapy exerted a significant indirect effect through plasma IL-6 levels only on the Delayed Recall Index of WMS-R (Table 3). It has been suggested that delayed recall memory is associated with the hippocampus 40,41. Furthermore, an animal study suggested that peripheral IL-6 signaled the brain and induced inflammation in the hippocampus 42. Therefore, the association between radiotherapy and memory function impairment might be explained partially by hippocampal inflammation caused by the elevation of plasma IL-6 levels, while adjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the hippocampal volume in breast cancer survivors 26,43. There were some limitations to this study. (1) This study was not an interventional study, and was a cross-sectional study. Therefore, the causality between variables was not guaranteed. (2) Because there was a considerable length in time span between the end of the therapies and the search points, the variance of measurements may be larger than if all searches had been performed at the same time after the therapies ended. This can reduce the power of the tests in this study. (3) The number of subjects was small. Therefore, the power of the tests might be reduced. (4) Because the subjects in this study were restricted to comparatively young breast cancer patients, the results should be generalized with caution. (5) The influence of residual cancer on inflammation could not be excluded. (6) Neuropsychological tests other than WMS-R were not conducted in this study. (7) Some factors other than plasma IL-6 that might be associated with cognitive impairment accompanied by radiotherapy, such as other proinflammatory cytokines, fatigue, anemia, chronic pain, etc., were not considered in this study. (8) Biological factors which might have elevated plasma IL-6 levels, such as medication, infection, etc., were not considered in this study.

Conclusion

Breast cancer patients exposed to adjuvant regional radiotherapy could have cognitive impairment, which might be partially mediated by the elevation of plasma IL-6 levels.
  37 in total

1.  No adverse effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on hippocampal volume in Japanese breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eisho Yoshikawa; Yutaka Matsuoka; Masatoshi Inagaki; Tomohito Nakano; Tatsuo Akechi; Makoto Kobayakawa; Maiko Fujimori; Naoki Nakaya; Nobuya Akizuki; Shigeru Imoto; Koji Murakami; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  No impairment of quality of life 18 months after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Virginie Marchand; Sylvain Bourdin; Christelle Charbonnel; Emmanuel Rio; Camille Munos; Loïc Campion; Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac; Albert Lisbona; Marc-André Mahé; Stéphane Supiot
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Interleukin-6 facilitates lipopolysaccharide-induced disruption in working memory and expression of other proinflammatory cytokines in hippocampal neuronal cell layers.

Authors:  Nathan L Sparkman; Jessica B Buchanan; Jonathan R R Heyen; Jing Chen; James L Beverly; Rodney W Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relation between body mass index and cognitive function in healthy middle-aged men and women.

Authors:  M Cournot; J C Marquié; D Ansiau; C Martinaud; H Fonds; J Ferrières; J B Ruidavets
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and cytokine levels in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Christina A Meyers; Maher Albitar; Elihu Estey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Self-reported cognitive impairment in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sadhna Kohli; Jennifer J Griggs; Joseph A Roscoe; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Christopher Bole; Karen M Mustian; Renae Hill; Kelly Smith; Howard Gross; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Proinflammatory cytokines and sickness behavior: implications for depression and cancer-related symptoms.

Authors:  Jamie S Myers
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Cytokine profiles in patients receiving wide-field + prostate boost radiotherapy (xRT) for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C J Kovacs; B M Daly; M J Evans; R M Johnke; T K Lee; U L Karlsson; R Allison; G S Eaves; L M Biggs
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2003-09-21       Impact factor: 3.861

9.  Prodromal Alzheimer's disease: successive emergence of the clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Hélène Amieva; Mélanie Le Goff; Xavier Millet; Jean Marc Orgogozo; Karine Pérès; Pascale Barberger-Gateau; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Jean François Dartigues
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Influence of radiation treatment on serum transferrin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Authors:  B Agroyannis; J Kouvaris; H Tzanatos; K Chondros; E Stringou; A Damatopoulou; A Dalamangas; D Koutsikos; C Papavasiliou
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

View more
  30 in total

1.  Phenotypic characterization of auxotrophic mutant of nontyphoidal Salmonella and determination of its cytotoxicity, tumor inhibiting cytokine gene expression in cell line models.

Authors:  Kadeeja Jazeela; Anirban Chakraborty; Akshatha Kotian; Vankadari Aditya; Ballamoole Krishna Kumar; Praveen Rai; Indrani Karunasagar; Vijaya Kumar Deekshit
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Trajectories of self-reported cognitive function in postmenopausal women during adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  John D Merriman; Susan M Sereika; Adam M Brufsky; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Kandace P McGuire; Jamie S Myers; Mary L Phillips; Christopher M Ryan; Amanda L Gentry; Lindsay D Jones; Catherine M Bender
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Patient-Reported Cognitive Impairment Among Women With Early Breast Cancer Randomly Assigned to Endocrine Therapy Alone Versus Chemoendocrine Therapy: Results From TAILORx.

Authors:  Lynne I Wagner; Robert J Gray; Joseph A Sparano; Timothy J Whelan; Sofia F Garcia; Betina Yanez; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Ruth C Carlos; Kathy S Albain; John A Olson; Matthew P Goetz; Kathleen I Pritchard; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; E Claire Dees; Worta J McCaskill-Stevens; Lori M Minasian; George W Sledge; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Long-term changes of cognitive impairment among older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Juhua Luo; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud; Michael Hendryx
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 5.  Role of interleukin-6 in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumari; B S Dwarakanath; Asmita Das; Anant Narayan Bhatt
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-03

6.  Changes in Attentional Function in Patients From Before Through 12 Months After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Carmen Kohler; Ming Chang; Yu-Yin Allemann-Su; Marcus Vetter; Miyeon Jung; Misook Jung; Yvette Conley; Steven Paul; Kord M Kober; Bruce A Cooper; Betty Smoot; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski; Maria C Katapodi
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Higher cardiorespiratory fitness levels are associated with greater hippocampal volume in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Laura Chaddock-Heyman; Michael J Mackenzie; Krystle Zuniga; Gillian E Cooke; Elizabeth Awick; Sarah Roberts; Kirk I Erickson; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Neurocognitive efficiency in breast cancer survivorship: A performance monitoring ERP study.

Authors:  Jessica Swainston; Courtney Louis; Jason Moser; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Cognitive Effects of Cancer and Cancer Treatments.

Authors:  Tim A Ahles; James C Root
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 22.098

10.  Effects of brief stress management interventions on distress and leukocyte nuclear factor kappa B expression during primary treatment for breast cancer: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Alain Diaz; Chloe J Taub; Marc E Lippman; Michael H Antoni; Bonnie B Blomberg
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.