| Literature DB >> 24756915 |
Osamu Shibayama1, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi, Masatoshi Inagaki, Yutaka Matsuoka, Eisho Yoshikawa, Yuriko Sugawara, Tatsuo Akechi, Noriaki Wada, Shigeru Imoto, Koji Murakami, Asao Ogawa, Akira Akabayashi, Yosuke Uchitomi.
Abstract
Although protracted cognitive impairment has been reported to occur after radiotherapy even when such therapy is not directed to brain areas, the mechanism remains unclear. This study investigated whether breast cancer patients exposed to local radiotherapy showed lower cognitive function mediated by higher plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels than those unexposed. We performed the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) and measured plasma IL-6 levels for 105 breast cancer surgical patients within 1 year after the initial therapy. The group differences in each of the indices of WMS-R were investigated between cancer patients exposed to adjuvant regional radiotherapy (n = 51) and those unexposed (n = 54) using analysis of covariance. We further investigated a mediation effect by plasma IL-6 levels on the relationship between radiotherapy and the indices of WMS-R using the bootstrapping method. The radiotherapy group showed significantly lower Immediate Verbal Memory Index and Delayed Recall Index (P = 0.001, P = 0.008, respectively). Radiotherapy exerted an indirect effect on the lower Delayed Recall Index of WMS-R through elevation of plasma IL-6 levels (bootstrap 95% confidence interval = -2.6626 to -0.0402). This study showed that breast cancer patients exposed to adjuvant regional radiotherapy in conservation therapy might have cognitive impairment even several months after their treatment. The relationship between the therapy and the cognitive impairment could be partially mediated by elevation of plasma IL-6 levels.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; cognitive impairment; interleukin-6; radiotherapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24756915 PMCID: PMC4101762 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Figure 1This flowchart illustrates subject sampling in this study. SCID, the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.
Figure 2Illustration of a mediation model 38, which hypothesizes that radiotherapy exerts an indirect effect on each of the indices of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) through plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels. Path a represents the effect of radiotherapy on plasma IL-6 levels, the proposed mediator. Path b represents the effect of plasma IL-6 levels on each of the indices of WMS-R partialling out the effect of radiotherapy. Path c' is the direct effect of radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R partialling out the effect of plasma IL-6 levels. The indirect effect of radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels is the product of a and b, which is tested with the bootstrap confidence interval (CI) obtained through the bootstrapping method.
Demographic or medical background information in the group of patients exposed to their radiotherapy and in the group of patients unexposed
| Received radiotherapy ( | Not received radiotherapy ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, year | 47.0 ± 5.2 | 46.6 ± 6.2 | 0.755 |
| Handedness: right-handedness, no. (%) | 49 (96.1) | 53 (98.1) | 0.611 |
| Hight, mean ± SD, cm | 156.9 ± 6.5 | 156.0 ± 5.2 | 0.432 |
| Weight, mean ± SD, kg | 56.9 ± 9.0 | 54.9 ± 6.3 | 0.196 |
| BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | 23.1 ± 3.4 | 22.5 ± 2.4 | 0.333 |
| Education, mean ± SD, year | 13.1 ± 1.9 | 13.2 ± 1.8 | 0.797 |
| Smoking, no. (%) | 8 (15.7) | 3 (5.6) | 0.116 |
| Accumulated alcohol consumption, mean ± SD, kg | 38.4 ± 60.4 | 27.9 ± 84.6 | 0.043 |
| Postmenopausal, no. (%) | 29 (56.9) | 31 (57.4) | 1.000 |
| PS: 0, no. (%) | 35 (71.4) | 38 (70.4) | 1.000 |
| Clinical stage: 0–I, no. (%) | 25 (49.0) | 13 (24.1) | 0.014 |
| Lymphnode metastasis: positive, no. (%) | 15 (29.4) | 18 (33.3) | 0.824 |
| Histological type, no. (%) | |||
| Carcinoma in situ | 4 (7.8) | 2 (3.7) | 0.428 |
| Invasive carcinoma | 39 (76.5) | 44 (81.5) | 0.696 |
| Special type | 8 (15.7) | 8 (14.8) | 1.000 |
| Histological grade: poor, no. (%) | 14 (27.5) | 14 (25.9) | 1.000 |
| Surgical type: partial mastectomy, no. (%) | 51 (100.0) | 6 (11.1) | 0.000 |
| Axillary lymphadectomy, no. (%) | 26 (51.0) | 44 (81.5) | 0.002 |
| Days after surgery, mean ± SD, day | 304 ± 101 | 270 ± 105 | 0.102 |
| Radiotherapy: boost irradiation, no. (%) | 20 (39.2) | NA | NA |
| Days after radiotherapy, mean ± SD, day | 226 ± 100 | NA | NA |
| Chemotherapy, no. (%) | 25 (49.0) | 26 (48.1) | 1.000 |
| Hormonal therapy, no. (%) | 17 (33.3) | 15 (27.8) | 0.685 |
NA, not applicable; BMI, body mass index; PS, performance status.
Two missing values were excluded.
Significant difference (P < 0.05) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.
Significant difference (P < 0.01) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.
Significant difference (P < 0.001) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.
Each of the indices of WMS-R in the group of patients exposed to their radiotherapy and in the group of patients unexposed
| Received radiotherapy ( | Not received radiotherapy ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| WMS-R index, mean ± SD | |||
| Attention/concentration | 97.4 ± 13.2 | 101.4 ± 10.3 | 0.238 |
| Verbal memory | 94.9 ± 12.4 | 103.6 ± 13.9 | 0.001 |
| Visual memory | 102.2 ± 9.9 | 102.4 ± 13.3 | 0.989 |
| Delayed recall | 98.5 ± 10.6 | 104.3 ± 11.4 | 0.008 |
WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.
One missing value was excluded.
Two missing values were excluded.
Three missing values were excluded.
Significant difference (P < 0.01) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.
Significant difference (P < 0.001) between radiotherapy group and no-radiotherapy group.
Regression coefficients between each pair of variables in the mediation models through which indirect effects of receiving radiotherapy on each of the indices of WMS-R through plasma IL-6 levels were estimated (Fig. 2), and bootstrap 95% CIs obtained through the bootstrapping method evaluating these indirect effects
| WMS-R index | Bootstrap 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attention/concentration | 0.8174 | −1.0133 | −1.4550 | −3.2207 to 0.1191 |
| Verbal memory | 0.8174 | −0.5331 | −7.2741 | −2.1231 to 0.3055 |
| Visual memory | 0.8173 | −0.3765 | 1.3768 | −1.7209 to 0.3672 |
| Delayed recall | 0.8138 | −1.1678 | −4.6102 | −2.6626 to −0.0402 |
WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; IL-6, interleukin-6; CI, confidence interval.
Regression coefficient between each pair of variables corresponding with each symbol representing each path in Figure 2.
The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 96 patients (received radiotherapy 49 and not received 47) were available for analysis.
The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 95 patients (received radiotherapy 48 and not received 47) were available for analysis.
The plasma IL-6 levels and the index of WMS-R of 94 patients (received radiotherapy 47 and not received 47) were available for analysis.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
The indirect effect mentioned was significant at α level P < 0.05.