Literature DB >> 24756811

Impact of breast reconstruction on the decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Awais Ashfaq1, Lee J McGhan, Barbara A Pockaj, Richard J Gray, Sanjay P Bagaria, Sarah A McLaughlin, William J Casey, Alanna M Rebecca, Peter Kreymerman, Nabil Wasif.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, there has been increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in patients with unilateral breast cancer and ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) undergoing mastectomy. Although many factors have been proposed to explain this trend, the impact of breast reconstruction on CPM has not been studied.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer or DCIS from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data (2004-2008) was conducted. Characteristics of patients undergoing CPM and reconstruction were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 102,674 patients diagnosed with DCIS or stage I to III infiltrating breast cancer underwent mastectomy for their primary lesion. Of these, 16,197 patients (16 %) underwent a CPM. A significantly higher proportion of women undergoing CPM had reconstruction performed (46 %) than those patients not undergoing CPM (15 %) (p < 0.001). Of the 20,760 patients (20 %) who underwent reconstruction, 7410 (36 %) had implant reconstruction, 7705 (37 %) tissue reconstruction, and 1941 (9 %) combined tissue/implant reconstruction; there were no data for 3,702 (18 %). There was an increasing trend of patients undergoing reconstruction from 2004 (n = 3390, 16.3 %) to 2008 (n = 5406, 26 %) (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, significant variables predicting CPM included age <45 years, stage I disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.54), lobular histology (OR 1.15, 95 % CI 1.11-1.20), and undergoing breast reconstruction (OR 3.58, 95 % CI 3.41-3.75).
CONCLUSIONS: Besides age, undergoing reconstructive surgery is the factor most strongly associated with CPM. This suggests that apart from risk reduction, the availability of and/or patient willingness to undergo breast reconstruction may influence the decision to undergo CPM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24756811     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3712-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Knowledge and Decisions Made for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Survey of Surgeons and Women in the General Population.

Authors:  Rachel C Hooper; Jessica Hsu; Anthony Duncan; Jessica M Bensenhaver; Lisa A Newman; Kelly M Kidwell; Kevin C Chung; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Treatment Update and Current Trends.

Authors:  Katrina B Mitchell; Henry Kuerer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Predictors for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yun Fu; Zhigang Zhuang; Michelle Dewing; Sophia Apple; Helena Chang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Long-Term Satisfaction and Body Image After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Jessica Y Islam; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Susan A Sabatino; Juan L Rodriguez; Clara N Lee; Dale P Sandler; Hazel B Nichols
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Understanding Stakeholder Preference for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Hina Panchal; Melissa Pilewskie; Clara Lee; Shantanu N Razdan; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.532

6.  Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in genetically high risk newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mara Tynan; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Shawna Willey; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Rachel Nusbaum; Gillian Hooker; Suzanne C O'Neill; Lina Jandorf; Scott P Kelly; Jessica Heinzmann; Sarah Kelleher; Elizabeth Poggi; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Utilization for Small Unilateral Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Alison S Baskin; Ton Wang; Brooke C Bredbeck; Brandy R Sinco; Nicholas L Berlin; Lesly A Dossett
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.417

8.  Predictors that Influence Election of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Women with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ who are BRCA-Negative.

Authors:  Nisreen Elsayegh; Jessica Profato; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Heather Lin; Henry M Kuerer; Can Ardic; Jennifer K Litton; Debasish Tripathy; Banu K Arun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: review of risk factors and risk-reducing strategies.

Authors:  N N Basu; L Barr; G L Ross; D G Evans
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-27

10.  Higher Stage of Disease Is Associated With Bilateral Mastectomy Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Elena M Kouri; Dee W West; Shoshana Rosenberg; Ann H Partridge; Joyce Lii; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.