BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging modality involving ionizing radiation. The presence of γ-H2AX foci after low to moderate ionizing radiation exposure has been demonstrated; however it is unknown whether very low ionizing radiation exposure doses from CT exams can induce γ-H2AX formation in vivo in young children. OBJECTIVE: To test whether very low ionizing radiation doses from CT exams can induce lymphocytic γ-H2AX foci (phosphorylated histones used as a marker of DNA damage) formation in vivo in young children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parents of participating children signed a consent form. Blood samples from three children (ages 3-21 months) undergoing CT exams involving very low blood ionizing radiation exposure doses (blood doses of 0.22-1.22 mGy) were collected immediately before and 1 h post CT exams. Isolated lymphocytes were quantified for γ-H2AX foci by a technician blinded to the radiation status and dose of the patients. Paired t-tests and regression analyses were performed with significance levels set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: We observed a dose-dependent increase in γ-H2AX foci post-CT exams (P = 0.046) among the three children. Ionizing radiation exposure doses led to a linear increase of foci per cell in post-CT samples (102% between lowest and highest dose). CONCLUSION: We found a significant induction of γ-H2AX foci in lymphocytes from post-CT samples of three very young children. When possible, CT exams should be limited or avoided by possibly applying non-ionizing radiation exposure techniques such as US or MRI.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging modality involving ionizing radiation. The presence of γ-H2AX foci after low to moderate ionizing radiation exposure has been demonstrated; however it is unknown whether very low ionizing radiation exposure doses from CT exams can induce γ-H2AX formation in vivo in young children. OBJECTIVE: To test whether very low ionizing radiation doses from CT exams can induce lymphocytic γ-H2AX foci (phosphorylated histones used as a marker of DNA damage) formation in vivo in young children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parents of participating children signed a consent form. Blood samples from three children (ages 3-21 months) undergoing CT exams involving very low blood ionizing radiation exposure doses (blood doses of 0.22-1.22 mGy) were collected immediately before and 1 h post CT exams. Isolated lymphocytes were quantified for γ-H2AX foci by a technician blinded to the radiation status and dose of the patients. Paired t-tests and regression analyses were performed with significance levels set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: We observed a dose-dependent increase in γ-H2AX foci post-CT exams (P = 0.046) among the three children. Ionizing radiation exposure doses led to a linear increase of foci per cell in post-CT samples (102% between lowest and highest dose). CONCLUSION: We found a significant induction of γ-H2AX foci in lymphocytes from post-CT samples of three very young children. When possible, CT exams should be limited or avoided by possibly applying non-ionizing radiation exposure techniques such as US or MRI.
Authors: E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklöf; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Helen C Turner; David J Brenner; Youhua Chen; Antonella Bertucci; Jian Zhang; Hongliang Wang; Oleksandra V Lyulko; Yanping Xu; Igor Shuryak; Julia Schaefer; Nabil Simaan; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Y Lawrence Yao; Sally A Amundson; Guy Garty Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2010-12-28 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Ksenia Gouliaeva; Arifur Rahman; William F Blakely; William M Bonner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brunhild M Halm; Adrian A Franke; Jennifer F Lai; Xingnan Li; Laurie J Custer; Ian Pagano; Robert V Cooney; Helen C Turner; David J Brenner Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2015-03
Authors: Frank Jermusek; Chelsea Benedict; Emma Dreischmeier; Michael Brand; Michael Uder; Justin J Jeffery; Frank N Ranallo; William E Fahl Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: H C Turner; I Shuryak; M Taveras; A Bertucci; J R Perrier; C Chen; C D Elliston; G W Johnson; L B Smilenov; S A Amundson; D J Brenner Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Hanns Leonhard Kaatsch; Benjamin Valentin Becker; Simone Schüle; Patrick Ostheim; Kai Nestler; Julia Jakobi; Barbara Schäfer; Thomas Hantke; Marc A Brockmann; Michael Abend; Stephan Waldeck; Matthias Port; Harry Scherthan; Reinhard Ullmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 4.379