Literature DB >> 24756179

Surgical waiting times and patient choice: how much delay do patients really want?

Vivak Chander Hansrani1, Angus Fong, Nicholas Ferran, Stephen Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 18-week target to treatment government initiative was implemented in 2004. In order for this to work, patients need to accept operative dates provided, otherwise the pathway will fail. AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to identify the earliest time patients would accept surgical intervention following assessment at an outpatient clinic and to identify the reasons why some patients would choose to delay surgery.
METHODS: This prospective study was carried out at an elective orthopaedic centre over a 5-month period. All new adult referrals to the department were asked to complete a seven-point questionnaire on waiting time preference and possible reasons for delaying surgery. No paediatric or spinal orthopaedics was carried out at the centre.
RESULTS: A total of 73 % of the 797 questionnaires were completed. Up to 16 % of patients could not accept day-case/inpatient operation within 6 weeks. Work commitment was the most common reason for choosing to delay surgery, with nearly 50 % of employed patients citing it as a reason. No significant difference was identified between inpatient and day-case procedures.
CONCLUSION: There is a risk that operative slots will be unfilled within the 18-week pathway. 18 % of patients will potentially refuse an operative date offered within 6 weeks of their outpatient visit. Work, holidays and care arrangements are important in uptake. A proactive strategy to improve the uptake of offered surgery is required to prevent operating slots being underutilised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24756179     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1460-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  7 in total

Review 1.  Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue.

Authors:  Andrea J Curtis; Colin O H Russell; Johannes U Stoelwinder; John J McNeil
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Waiting for orthopaedic surgery: factors associated with waiting times and patients' opinion.

Authors:  Sofia Löfvendahl; Ingemar Eckerlund; Helen Hansagi; Bengt Malmqvist; Sylvia Resch; Marianne Hanning
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  In the queue for total joint replacement: patients' perspectives on waiting times. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; R Arshinoff; M Bell; J I Williams; C D Naylor
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Evaluation of explicit prioritisation for elective surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sarah Derrett; Charlotte Paul; Peter Herbison; Helen Williams
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2002-07

5.  Factors affecting willingness to undergo carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Gong; Goo Hyun Baek; Joo Han Oh; Young Ho Lee; Suk Ha Jeon; Moon Sang Chung
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A new pathway for elective surgery to reduce cancellation rates.

Authors:  Einar Hovlid; Oddbjørn Bukve; Kjell Haug; Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen; Christian von Plessen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The acceptability of waiting times for elective general surgery and the appropriateness of prioritising patients.

Authors:  Jurriaan P Oudhoff; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martin Rietberg; Dirk L Knol; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.