BACKGROUND: Bilateral vestibular dysfunction causes serious disabilities and handicaps. Patients with bilateral dysfunction often restrict their activities and tend to be unsocial. AIM: To compare the effects of vestibular rehabilitation on disability, balance, and postural stability in patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular dysfunction. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation center. POPULATION: Patients with unilateral (group 1, N.=42) and bilateral vestibular dysfunction (group 2, N.=19). METHODS: All patients were evaluated before and after eight weeks of customized vestibular rehabilitation for disability (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI], Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC]), dynamic balance (Timed Up and Go Test [TUG], Dynamic Gait Index [DGI]), and postural stability (static posturography). RESULTS: The differences between DHI, TUG, DGI, and falling index (as assessed by static posturography) scores before and after the exercise program were statistically significant in both groups (P<0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in any of the parameters evaluated (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, vestibular rehabilitation was found to be equally effective in unilateral and bilateral vestibular dysfunction patients for improving disability, dynamic balance, and postural stability. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Patients with bilateral dysfunction, causing more disability and greater handicap may indeed regain their functions as in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction by receiving appropriate and adequate vestibular rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND:Bilateral vestibular dysfunction causes serious disabilities and handicaps. Patients with bilateral dysfunction often restrict their activities and tend to be unsocial. AIM: To compare the effects of vestibular rehabilitation on disability, balance, and postural stability in patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular dysfunction. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING:Outpatient rehabilitation center. POPULATION: Patients with unilateral (group 1, N.=42) and bilateral vestibular dysfunction (group 2, N.=19). METHODS: All patients were evaluated before and after eight weeks of customized vestibular rehabilitation for disability (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI], Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC]), dynamic balance (Timed Up and Go Test [TUG], Dynamic Gait Index [DGI]), and postural stability (static posturography). RESULTS: The differences between DHI, TUG, DGI, and falling index (as assessed by static posturography) scores before and after the exercise program were statistically significant in both groups (P<0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in any of the parameters evaluated (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, vestibular rehabilitation was found to be equally effective in unilateral and bilateral vestibular dysfunctionpatients for improving disability, dynamic balance, and postural stability. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Patients with bilateral dysfunction, causing more disability and greater handicap may indeed regain their functions as in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction by receiving appropriate and adequate vestibular rehabilitation.
Authors: Maxime Maheu; Philippe Fournier; Simon P Landry; Marie-Soleil Houde; François Champoux; Issam Saliba Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Nolan Herssens; Bieke Dobbels; Julie Moyaert; Raymond Van de Berg; Wim Saeys; Ann Hallemans; Luc Vereeck; Vincent Van Rompaey Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.003