Literature DB >> 24755722

Post-electroconvulsive therapy recovery and reorientation time with methohexital and ketamine: a randomized, longitudinal, crossover design trial.

Tony Yen1, Mohamad Khafaja, Nicholas Lam, James Crumbacher, Ronald Schrader, John Rask, Mary Billstrand, Jacob Rothfork, Christopher C Abbott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Methohexital, a barbiturate anesthetic commonly used for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), possesses dose-dependent anticonvulsant properties, and its use can interfere with effective seizure therapy in patients with high seizure thresholds. Ketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist with epileptogenic properties not broadly used for ECT inductions, is a commonly used induction agent for general anesthesia. Recent studies suggest that the use of ketamine is effective in allowing successful ECT treatment in patients with high seizure thresholds without an increase in adverse effects. In this preliminary study, we directly compared the recovery and reorientation times of subjects receiving ketamine and methohexital for ECTs.
METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized in a crossover design to receive methohexital and ketamine for ECT inductions in alternating fashion in 6 trials. Primary outcome measures were recovery time (voluntary movement, respiratory effort, blood pressure, consciousness, and O2 saturation) and reorientation time. Secondary outcome measures were individual recovery variables, adverse effect occurrence, and seizure duration.
RESULTS: Overall recovery time was not significantly different between the 2 treatment arms (F(1, 17) = 0.72; P = 0.41). Reorientation time was faster in the methohexital arm (F(1, 17) = 9.23; P = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Ketamine inductions resulted in higher number of adverse effects, higher subject dropout rates, and a longer reorientation time with respect to methohexital inductions. No significant difference in postanesthesia recovery time was found between the ketamine and methohexital arms. Intolerability to ketamine affected a significant proportion of subjects and suggests that ketamine should remain as an alternative or adjunctive agent for patients with high seizure thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24755722      PMCID: PMC4205224          DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J ECT        ISSN: 1095-0680            Impact factor:   3.635


  25 in total

Review 1.  Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Zhengnian Ding; Paul F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Sodium methohexital: a clinical study.

Authors:  G M WYANT; C A CHANG
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1959-01

3.  Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  M A Hughes; P S Glass; J R Jacobs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Antidepressant effect of ketamine during ECT.

Authors:  Robert Ostroff; Marbiela Gonzales; Gerard Sanacora
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Etomidate versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gábor Gazdag; Nárcisz Kocsis; Judit Tolna; Zsolt Iványi
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.635

6.  Ketamine appears associated with better word recall than etomidate after a course of 6 electroconvulsive therapies.

Authors:  William W McDaniel; Anupinder K Sahota; Barin V Vyas; Nena Laguerta; Liana Hategan; Jessica Oswald
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.635

7.  Ketamine--its pharmacology and therapeutic uses.

Authors:  P F White; W L Way; A J Trevor
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  A randomized comparison of ketamine versus methohexital anesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Keith G Rasmussen; Simon Kung; Maria I Lapid; Tyler S Oesterle; Jennifer R Geske; Gregory A Nuttall; William C Oliver; John P Abenstein
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Pharmacokinetics of methohexitone following intravenous infusion in humans.

Authors:  D D Breimer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Comparison of seizure duration, ictal EEG, and cognitive effects of ketamine and methohexital anesthesia with ECT.

Authors:  Andrew D Krystal; Richard D Weiner; Margaret D Dean; Virginia H Lindahl; Louis A Tramontozzi; Grace Falcone; C Edward Coffey
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.198

View more
  4 in total

1.  S -ketamine compared to etomidate during electroconvulsive therapy in major depression.

Authors:  Maxim Zavorotnyy; Ina Kluge; Kathrin Ahrens; Thomas Wohltmann; Benjamin Köhnlein; Patricia Dietsche; Udo Dannlowski; Tilo Kircher; Carsten Konrad
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  [Ketamine as anesthetic agent in electroconvulsion therapy].

Authors:  C Janke; J M Bumb; S S Aksay; M Thiel; L Kranaster; A Sartorius
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Study protocol for the randomised controlled trial: Ketamine augmentation of ECT to improve outcomes in depression (Ketamine-ECT study).

Authors:  Liam Trevithick; R Hamish McAllister-Williams; Andrew Blamire; Tim Branton; Ross Clark; Darragh Downey; Graham Dunn; Andrew Easton; Rebecca Elliott; Clare Ellwell; Katherine Hayden; Fiona Holland; Salman Karim; Jo Lowe; Colleen Loo; Rajesh Nair; Timothy Oakley; Antony Prakash; Parveen K Sharma; Stephen R Williams; Ian M Anderson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Ketamine augmentation of electroconvulsive therapy to improve neuropsychological and clinical outcomes in depression (Ketamine-ECT): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial.

Authors:  Ian M Anderson; Andrew Blamire; Tim Branton; Ross Clark; Darragh Downey; Graham Dunn; Andrew Easton; Rebecca Elliott; Clare Elwell; Katherine Hayden; Fiona Holland; Salman Karim; Colleen Loo; Jo Lowe; Rajesh Nair; Timothy Oakley; Antony Prakash; Parveen K Sharma; Stephen R Williams; R Hamish McAllister-Williams
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 27.083

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.