Literature DB >> 24755512

Contrasting Roles of the Apoplastic Aspartyl Protease APOPLASTIC, ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1-DEPENDENT1 and LEGUME LECTIN-LIKE PROTEIN1 in Arabidopsis Systemic Acquired Resistance.

Heiko H Breitenbach1, Marion Wenig1, Finni Wittek1, Lucia Jordá1, Ana M Maldonado-Alconada1, Hakan Sarioglu1, Thomas Colby1, Claudia Knappe1, Marlies Bichlmeier1, Elisabeth Pabst1, David Mackey1, Jane E Parker1, A Corina Vlot2.   

Abstract

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is an inducible immune response that depends on ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 (EDS1). Here, we show that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) EDS1 is required for both SAR signal generation in primary infected leaves and SAR signal perception in systemic uninfected tissues. In contrast to SAR signal generation, local resistance remains intact in eds1 mutant plants in response to Pseudomonas syringae delivering the effector protein AvrRpm1. We utilized the SAR-specific phenotype of the eds1 mutant to identify new SAR regulatory proteins in plants conditionally expressing AvrRpm1. Comparative proteomic analysis of apoplast-enriched extracts from AvrRpm1-expressing wild-type and eds1 mutant plants led to the identification of 12 APOPLASTIC, EDS1-DEPENDENT (AED) proteins. The genes encoding AED1, a predicted aspartyl protease, and another AED, LEGUME LECTIN-LIKE PROTEIN1 (LLP1), were induced locally and systemically during SAR signaling and locally by salicylic acid (SA) or its functional analog, benzo 1,2,3-thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester. Because conditional overaccumulation of AED1-hemagglutinin inhibited SA-induced resistance and SAR but not local resistance, the data suggest that AED1 is part of a homeostatic feedback mechanism regulating systemic immunity. In llp1 mutant plants, SAR was compromised, whereas the local resistance that is normally associated with EDS1 and SA as well as responses to exogenous SA appeared largely unaffected. Together, these data indicate that LLP1 promotes systemic rather than local immunity, possibly in parallel with SA. Our analysis reveals new positive and negative components of SAR and reinforces the notion that SAR represents a distinct phase of plant immunity beyond local resistance.
© 2014 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755512      PMCID: PMC4044859          DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.239665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  119 in total

1.  Arabidopsis EDS1 connects pathogen effector recognition to cell compartment-specific immune responses.

Authors:  Katharina Heidrich; Lennart Wirthmueller; Céline Tasset; Cécile Pouzet; Laurent Deslandes; Jane E Parker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells.

Authors:  Steven H Spoel; Xinnian Dong
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Aspartic proteinase content of the Arabidopsis genome.

Authors:  Carlos Faro; Susannah Gal
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Marieke van Hulten; Maaike Pelser; L C van Loon; Corné M J Pieterse; Jurriaan Ton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node.

Authors:  Marcel Wiermer; Bart J Feys; Jane E Parker
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.834

6.  RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  David Mackey; Ben F Holt; Aaron Wiig; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Balanced nuclear and cytoplasmic activities of EDS1 are required for a complete plant innate immune response.

Authors:  Ana V García; Servane Blanvillain-Baufumé; Robin P Huibers; Marcel Wiermer; Guangyong Li; Enrico Gobbato; Steffen Rietz; Jane E Parker
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 8.  Salicylic Acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease.

Authors:  A Corina Vlot; D'Maris Amick Dempsey; Daniel F Klessig
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.078

9.  Phloem-based resistance to green peach aphid is controlled by Arabidopsis PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 without its signaling partner ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1.

Authors:  Venkatramana Pegadaraju; Joe Louis; Vijay Singh; John C Reese; Jaqueline Bautor; Bart J Feys; Graeme Cook; Jane E Parker; Jyoti Shah
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  Reprogramming of plants during systemic acquired resistance.

Authors:  Katrin Gruner; Thomas Griebel; Hana Návarová; Elham Attaran; Jürgen Zeier
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  42 in total

1.  Proteome-Wide Analysis of Cysteine Reactivity during Effector-Triggered Immunity.

Authors:  Evan W McConnell; Philip Berg; Timothy J Westlake; Katherine M Wilson; George V Popescu; Leslie M Hicks; Sorina C Popescu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Identification of I-7 expands the repertoire of genes for resistance to Fusarium wilt in tomato to three resistance gene classes.

Authors:  Yvonne Gonzalez-Cendales; Ann-Maree Catanzariti; Barbara Baker; Des J Mcgrath; David A Jones
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.663

3.  Secrets of the Forest: Volatiles First Discovered in Pine Trees Propagate Defense Signals within and between Plants.

Authors:  Kathleen L Farquharson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Cotton S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase-mediated spermine biosynthesis is required for salicylic acid- and leucine-correlated signaling in the defense response to Verticillium dahliae.

Authors:  Hui-Juan Mo; Yan-Xiang Sun; Xiao-Li Zhu; Xing-Fen Wang; Yan Zhang; Jun Yang; Gui-Jun Yan; Zhi-Ying Ma
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Oomycete small RNAs bind to the plant RNA-induced silencing complex for virulence.

Authors:  Florian Dunker; Adriana Trutzenberg; Jan S Rothenpieler; Sarah Kuhn; Reinhard Pröls; Tom Schreiber; Alain Tissier; Ariane Kemen; Eric Kemen; Ralph Hückelhoven; Arne Weiberg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Monoterpenes Support Systemic Acquired Resistance within and between Plants.

Authors:  Marlies Riedlmeier; Andrea Ghirardo; Marion Wenig; Claudia Knappe; Kerstin Koch; Elisabeth Georgii; Sanjukta Dey; Jane E Parker; Jörg-Peter Schnitzler; A Corina Vlot
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Dual and Opposing Roles of Xanthine Dehydrogenase in Defense-Associated Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Xianfeng Ma; Wenming Wang; Florian Bittner; Nadine Schmidt; Robert Berkey; Lingli Zhang; Harlan King; Yi Zhang; Jiayue Feng; Yinqiang Wen; Liqiang Tan; Yue Li; Qiong Zhang; Ziniu Deng; Xingyao Xiong; Shunyuan Xiao
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Aspartyl Protease-Mediated Cleavage of BAG6 Is Necessary for Autophagy and Fungal Resistance in Plants.

Authors:  Yurong Li; Mehdi Kabbage; Wende Liu; Martin B Dickman
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Phloem Exudates Collected during the Induction of Systemic Acquired Resistance.

Authors:  Philip Carella; Juliane Merl-Pham; Daniel C Wilson; Sanjukta Dey; Stefanie M Hauck; A Corina Vlot; Robin K Cameron
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Processing of AtBAG6 triggers autophagy and fungal resistance.

Authors:  Yurong Li; Marty Dickman
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2016-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.