Literature DB >> 24755335

Meta-analysis of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus drug-eluting stents for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease.

Ralf E Harskamp1, Judson B Williams2, Michael E Halkos3, Renato D Lopes2, Jan G P Tijssen4, T Bruce Ferguson5, Robbert J de Winter4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes between minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MINI-CAB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for isolated left anterior descending artery disease.
METHODS: Randomized and observational comparative publications were identified using MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases (January 2003 to December 2013). Studies without outcomes data, without DES use, or using conventional bypass surgery were excluded. The outcomes of interest were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and periprocedural stroke. Data were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel methods and are presented as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and number needed to treat.
RESULTS: From 230 publications, we identified 4 studies (2 randomized and 2 observational) with 941 patients (478 had undergone MINI-CAB and 463 DES implantation). The incidence of target vessel revascularization at maximum follow-up (range, 6-60 months) was significantly lower in the MINI-CAB group (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.30; P<.0001; number needed to treat, 13). The incidence of cardiac mortality and MI was similar between the MINI-CAB and DES groups during follow-up (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.44-2.47; and OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.43-1.58, respectively). In addition, a similar incidence of periprocedural death (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.21-3.47; P=.82), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.38-2.58; P=.97), and stroke (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.28-6.70; P=.70) was observed between the 2 treatment modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the available evidence, MINI-CAB will result in lower target vessel revascularization rates but otherwise similar clinical outcomes compared with DESs in patients with left anterior descending artery disease.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755335      PMCID: PMC4322677          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  29 in total

1.  The revival of surgical treatment for isolated proximal high grade LAD lesions by minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A Diegeler; N Spyrantis; M Matin; V Falk; R Hambrecht; R Autschbach; F W Mohr; G Schuler
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: technique and comparative results.

Authors:  M A Groh; S E Sutherland; H G Burton; A M Johnson; S W Ely
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Comparison of MIDCAP versus conventional CABG surgery regarding pain and quality of life.

Authors:  A Diegeler; T Walther; S Metz; V Falk; R Krakor; R Autschbach; F W Mohr
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Michael E Halkos; Henry A Liberman; Chandan Devireddy; Patrick Walker; Aloke V Finn; Wissam Jaber; Robert A Guyton; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Five-year follow-up of drug-eluting stents implantation vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Yves Etienne; William D'hoore; Spiridon Papadatos; Yves Mairy; Gebrine El Khoury; Philippe Noirhomme; Claude Hanet; David Glineur
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 6.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Zhe Zheng; John H Alexander; Judson B Williams; Ying Xian; Michael E Halkos; J Matthew Brennan; Robbert J de Winter; Peter K Smith; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus stenting versus left internal mammary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  J H O'Keefe; T R Kreamer; P G Jones; J L Vacek; M E Gorton; G F Muehlebach; B D Rutherford; B D McCallister
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of medicine alone, coronary angioplasty, and left internal mammary artery-coronary artery bypass for one-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A B Greenbaum; R M Califf; R H Jones; L H Gardner; H R Phillips; M H Sketch; R S Stack; J A Puma
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Recent advances in minimal-access cardiac surgery using robotic-enhanced surgical systems.

Authors:  Roberto Casula; Thanos Athanasiou; Rodney Foale
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2004-07
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Stenting versus surgery for significant left main disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Duk-Woo Park
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Hybrid coronary revascularization: present indications and future perspective.

Authors:  Konstantinos Voudris; Dimitrios V Avgerinos; Dmitriy Feldman; Konstantinos Charitakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  Hybrid myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Yugal Kishore Mishra; Jatin Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-03-05

Review 4.  The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew A Brown; Seth Klusewitz; John Elefteriades; Lindsey Prescher
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  Repeat Revascularization Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Traditional Sternotomy Techniques in 1468 Cases.

Authors:  Peter Olson; Michael Cinelli; Hamfreth S Rahming; Thomas Vazzana; Jonathan Spagnola; Emad Barsoum; Marc Assaad; Frank Tamburrino; James Lafferty
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-06

6.  Long-term Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared with Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Elderly.

Authors:  Emad A Barsoum; Basem Azab; Nileshkumar Patel; Jonathan Spagnola; Masood A Shariff; Umar Kaleem; Rewais Morcus; Deepak Asti; Joseph T McGinn; James Lafferty; Donald A McCord
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2016-02-08

Review 7.  Physiology of in-situ arterial revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors and influences.

Authors:  T Bruce Ferguson
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.