| Literature DB >> 24755211 |
Wenwen Du1, Chang Su, Huijun Wang, Zhihong Wang, Youfa Wang, Bing Zhang.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The neighbourhood availability of restaurants has been linked to the weight status. However, little is known regarding the relation between access to restaurant and obesity among the Chinese population. This study aims to explore the relationship between neighbourhood restaurant density and body mass index (BMI) in rural China.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Nutrition; Nutrition & Dietetics
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24755211 PMCID: PMC4010850 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Descriptive demographic statistics of Chinese rural adults
| Variables | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 | 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 | |
| N | 2983 | 2911 | 3074 | 2867 | 3077 | 3127 | 3231 | 3126 |
| Mean age (years) | 46.93 (14.78) | 48.23 (14.75) | 49.34 (15.11) | 51.30 (14.95) | 46.86 (14.24) | 48.15 (14.40) | 49.40 (14.73) | 51.07 (14.70) |
| Currently married (%) | 83.31 | 85.57 | 85.36 | 86.33 | 84.47 | 85.55 | 84.96 | 84.36 |
| Education level (%) | ||||||||
| no/primary/junior middle school | 80.39 | 77.33 | 80.90 | 80.09 | 88.46 | 86.73 | 87.87 | 86.69 |
| Senior middle school | 17.70 | 19.82 | 16.30 | 16.11 | 10.43 | 11.38 | 9.87 | 10.14 |
| College and above | 1.91 | 2.85 | 2.80 | 3.80 | 1.11 | 1.89 | 2.26 | 3.17 |
| Income (RMB/person×year) | 6658.31 (6951.94) | 7991.00 (10276.36) | 11311.05 (14755.88) | 14118.71 (17581.42) | 6511.20 (6785.52) | 7699.53 (10557.88) | 10763.23 (13727.80) | 12934.76 (15344.53) |
| Drinking (%) | 61.15 | 60.01 | 61.22 | 61.11 | 7.64 | 7.36 | 8.26 | 8.32 |
| Smoking (%) | 59.37 | 56.41 | 57.42 | 56.71 | 4.32 | 3.84 | 4.05 | 3.90 |
| Moderate/heavy physical activity (%) | 59.60 | 56.78 | 59.04 | 60.34 | 45.69 | 43.08 | 42.77 | 44.66 |
Numbers in parentheses are SDs.
Figure 1Body mass index (BMI) distribution trend among Chinese rural adults (2004–2011).
Changes in the neighbourhood food environment in rural China: 2004–2011
| Variables | 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urbanicity index | 52.92 (16.66)* | 54.82 (17.25)* | 58.48 (60.39)† | 60.39 (15.93)† |
| Number of fast-food restaurants in the neighbourhood | 0.28 (1.54) | 0.49 (2.61) | 0.1 (0.51) | 0.13 (0.89) |
| Number of indoor restaurants in the neighbourhood | 6.53 (13.42) | 7.65 (14.45) | 5.61 (8.94) | 6.08 (10.49) |
| Number of fixed outdoor food stalls in the neighbourhood | 6.28 (12.71) | 6.83 (12.58) | 4.17 (9.71) | 3.97 (8.60) |
*Indicated that the differences in urbanicity index values in 2004, 2006, 2009 and 2011 were insignificant, while the last two waves† have higher index scores than the first two waves (p<0.05). Numbers of three kinds of restaurant in the neighbourhood found no significant change between four survey waves (p>0.05).
Estimates from the three-level linear growth models examining body mass index among rural men (N=11835) 2004–2011
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 22.54 (0.05)* | 21.85 (0.10)* | 21.68 (0.10)* |
| Year (ref=2004) | 0.28 (0.02)* | 0.26 (0.02)* | 0.26 (0.02)* |
| Individual level | |||
| Age (grand-mean centred) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | |
| Currently married (ref=no) | 0.75 (0.08)* | 0.74 (0.08)* | |
| Education level (ref=no/primary/junior) | 0.24 (0.06)* | 0.22 (0.06)* | |
| Per capita household income (ref=low) | 0.11 (0.03)* | 0.10 (0.03)* | |
| Drinking (ref=no) | 0.12 (0.04)* | 0.12 (0.04)* | |
| Smoking (ref=no) | −0.15 (0.04)* | −0.15 (0.04)* | |
| Moderate/heavy physical activity (ref=no) | −0.16 (0.04)* | −0.13 (0.04)* | |
| Motorcycle ownership (ref=no) | 0.10 (0.04)* | 0.10 (0.04)* | |
| Car ownership (ref=no) | 0.03 (0.07) | 0.02 (0.07) | |
| Neighbourhood level | |||
| Number of fast-food restaurants in the neighbourhood | −0.01 (0.01) | ||
| Number of indoor restaurants in the neighbourhood | 0.01 (0.00)* | ||
| Number of fixed outdoor food stalls in the neighbourhood | −0.01 (0.00)* | ||
| Urbanicity index (ref=low) | 0.19 (0.04)* | ||
| Random effects | |||
| Intercept | 8.33 (0.23)* | 7.88 (0.23)* | 7.76 (0.22)* |
| Year | 0.51 (0.03)* | 0.51 (0.03)* | 0.51 (0.03)* |
| Residual | 1.82 (0.04)* | 1.83 (0.04)* | 1.83 (0.04)* |
| Model fit | |||
| −2LL | 54345.2 | 54060.4 | 54017.5 |
| AIC | 54357.2 | 54090.4 | 54055.5 |
| BIC | 54395.8 | 54187.0 | 54177.8 |
*p<0.05.
AIC, Akaike's information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.
Estimates from the three-level linear growth models examining body mass index among rural women (N=12 561) 2004–2011
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 22.92 (0.05)* | 22.72 (0.09)* | 22.64 (0.10)* |
| Year (ref=2004) | 0.20 (0.02)* | 0.12 (0.02)* | 0.12 (0.02)* |
| Individual level | |||
| Age (grand-mean centred) | 0.04 (0.00)* | 0.04 (0.00)* | |
| Currently married (ref=no) | 0.65 (0.08)* | 0.66 (0.08)* | |
| Education level (ref=no/primary/junior) | −0.47 (0.08)* | −0.49 (0.08)* | |
| Per capita household income (ref=low) | 0.04 (0.02) | 0.04 (0.02) | |
| Drinking (ref=no) | −0.00 (0.06) | −0.00 (0.06) | |
| Smoking (ref=no) | −0.04 (0.13) | −0.04 (0.13) | |
| Moderate/heavy physical activity (ref=no) | −0.11 (0.04)* | −0.10 (0.04)* | |
| Motorcycle ownership (ref=no) | −0.00 (0.04) | −0.00 (0.04) | |
| Car ownership (ref=no) | 0.01 (0.06) | 0.01 (0.06) | |
| Neighbourhood level | |||
| Number of fast-food restaurants in the neighbourhood | −0.02 (0.01)* | ||
| Number of indoor restaurants in the neighbourhood | 0.005 (0.002)* | ||
| Number of fixed outdoor food stalls in the neighbourhood | −0.004 (0.002)* | ||
| Urbanicity index (ref=low) | 0.09 (0.04)* | ||
| Random effects | |||
| Intercept | 10.16 (0.27)* | 9.37 (0.25)* | 9.32 (0.25)* |
| Year | 0.41 (0.02)* | 0.41 (0.02)* | 0.41 (0.02)* |
| Residual | 1.73 (0.04)* | 1.74 (0.04)* | 1.74 (0.04)* |
| Model fit | |||
| −2LL | 57535.1 | 57098.1 | 57077.6 |
| AIC | 57547.1 | 57128.1 | 57115.6 |
| BIC | 57586.0 | 57225.2 | 57238.6 |
*p<0.05.
AIC, Akaike's information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.