Literature DB >> 24754837

A 3D biomimetic model of tissue stiffness interface for cancer drug testing.

Chee Ren Ivan Lam1, Hui Kian Wong, Spencer Nai, Chee Kai Chua, Nguan Soon Tan, Lay Poh Tan.   

Abstract

Contrary to oversimplified preclinical drug screens that derive treatment responses of cancer cells grown on plastic cell culturing surfaces, the actual in vivo scenario for cancer cell invasion is confronted with a diversity of tissue stiffness. After all, the packing of organs and tissues in the body translates to the abundant presence of tissue stiffness interfaces. The invasive dissemination of cancer cells in vivo might be encouraged by favorable tissue stiffness gradients, likely explaining the preferential spread of cancer cells which is subjective to the cancer type and origin of the primary site. Yet these critical tumor microenvironmental influences cannot be recapitulated in 2D preclinical drug screens, hence omitting potentially invaluable in vivo patterns of drug responses that may support safer clinical dosage implementation of cancer drugs. Current attempts to study stiffness implications on cancer cells are largely confined to 2D surfaces of tunable stiffness. While these studies collectively show that cancer cells migrate better on a stiffer matrix, the generation of a biomimetic 3D tissue stiffness interface for cancer cell migration would clearly give a more definitive understanding on the probable push and pull influences of the 3D ECM. Herein, we developed a biomimetic platform which enables the precise placement of spheroids at tissue stiffness interfaces constructed with natural ECM collagen type I. This enables a standardized comparison of spheroid invasion under a 3D stiffness gradient influence. We found that cancer cells in 3D infiltrated more extensively into a softer matrix of 300 Pa while showing significantly reduced invasion into stiffer matrix of 1200 and 6000 Pa. These biomimetic spheroid cultures postinvasion were suitably subjected to paclitaxel treatment and subsequent daily live quantification of apoptotic cells to evaluate the implications of tissue stiffness on chemotherapeutic treatment. We importantly found that cancer cells which more extensively infiltrated the 300 Pa matrix also succumbed to paclitaxel induced apoptosis earlier than cells in stiffer matrices of 1200 and 6000 Pa respectively. This suggests that reduced invasion of cancer cells attributed to increased tissue stiffness barriers may favor their reduced apoptotic susceptibility to chemotherapeutic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24754837     DOI: 10.1021/mp500059q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  16 in total

1.  Integration of hyper-compliant microparticles into a 3D melanoma tumor model.

Authors:  Manisha K Shah; Elizabeth A Leary; Eric M Darling
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Biomaterials-Based Approaches to Tumor Spheroid and Organoid Modeling.

Authors:  Pradip Shahi Thakuri; Chun Liu; Gary D Luker; Hossein Tavana
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  3D modeling in cancer studies.

Authors:  Oula El Atat; Zahra Farzaneh; Mahsa Pourhamzeh; Fatima Taki; Ralph Abi-Habib; Massoud Vosough; Mirvat El-Sibai
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 4.  Materials-driven approaches to understand extrinsic drug resistance in cancer.

Authors:  Justin R Pritchard; Michael J Lee; Shelly R Peyton
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  A biomaterial screening approach reveals microenvironmental mechanisms of drug resistance.

Authors:  Alyssa D Schwartz; Lauren E Barney; Lauren E Jansen; Thuy V Nguyen; Christopher L Hall; Aaron S Meyer; Shelly R Peyton
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  Breast cancer models: Engineering the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Gokhan Bahcecioglu; Gozde Basara; Bradley W Ellis; Xiang Ren; Pinar Zorlutuna
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  In vitro microtumors provide a physiologically predictive tool for breast cancer therapeutic screening.

Authors:  Gabriel Benton; Gerald DeGray; Hynda K Kleinman; Jay George; Irina Arnaoutova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Three-Dimensional Microfluidic Tri-Culture Model of the Bone Marrow Microenvironment for Study of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Allison Bruce; Rebecca Evans; Ryan Mezan; Lin Shi; Blake S Moses; Karen H Martin; Laura F Gibson; Yong Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modulation of Huh7.5 spheroid formation and functionality using modified PEG-based hydrogels of different stiffness.

Authors:  Bae Hoon Lee; Myung Hee Kim; Jae Ho Lee; Dror Seliktar; Nam-Joon Cho; Lay Poh Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Tissue engineered platforms for studying primary and metastatic neoplasm behavior in bone.

Authors:  Victoria L Thai; Katherine H Griffin; Steven W Thorpe; R Lor Randall; J Kent Leach
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.