Literature DB >> 24754804

Increased facial width-to-height ratio and perceived dominance in the faces of the UK's leading business leaders.

Shuaa Alrajih1, Jamie Ward.   

Abstract

The relative proportion of the internal features of a face (the facial width-to-height ratio, FWH) has been shown to be related to individual differences in behaviour in males, specifically competitiveness and aggressiveness. In this study, we show that the Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of the leading UK businesses have greater FWHs than age- and sex-matched controls. We demonstrate that perceivers, naive as to the nature of the stimuli, rate the faces of CEOs as higher in dominance or success, and that ratings of dominance or success are themselves correlated with the FWH ratio. We find no association with other inferred traits such as trustworthiness, attraction or aggression. The latter is surprising given previous research demonstrating a link between FWH and ratings of aggression. We speculate that the core association may be between FWH and drive for dominance or power, but this can be interpreted as aggression only in particular circumstances (e.g., when the stimuli are comprised of faces of young, as opposed to middle-aged, men).
© 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24754804     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  11 in total

1.  Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood.

Authors:  Andrew J O Whitehouse; Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Faisal Shafait; Ajmal Mian; Diana Weiting Tan; Murray T Maybery; Jeffrey A Keelan; Roger Hart; David J Handelsman; Mithran Goonawardene; Peter Eastwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Within-person variability in men's facial width-to-height ratio.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Presenting Your Best Self(ie): The Influence of Gender on Vertical Orientation of Selfies on Tinder.

Authors:  Jennifer R Sedgewick; Meghan E Flath; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-21

4.  Inter-rater agreement in trait judgements from faces.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer; Mila Mileva; Kay L Ritchie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Facial width-to-height ratio differs by social rank across organizations, countries, and value systems.

Authors:  Tim Hahn; Nils R Winter; Christine Anderl; Karolien Notebaert; Alina Marie Wuttke; Celina Chantal Clément; Sabine Windmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  E-perceptions and Business 'Mating': The Communication Effects of the Relative Width of Males' Faces in Business Portraits.

Authors:  Eveline van Zeeland; Jörg Henseler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-16

8.  Looking like a leader-facial shape predicts perceived height and leadership ability.

Authors:  Daniel E Re; David W Hunter; Vinet Coetzee; Bernard P Tiddeman; Dengke Xiao; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Facial Appearance of CEOs: Faces Signal Selection but Not Performance.

Authors:  Janka I Stoker; Harry Garretsen; Luuk J Spreeuwers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.