Literature DB >> 24754672

The effect of non-surgical weight loss interventions on urinary incontinence in overweight women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

D Vissers1, H Neels, A Vermandel, S De Wachter, W A A Tjalma, J-J Wyndaele, J Taeymans.   

Abstract

Although the aetiology of urinary incontinence can be multifactorial, in some cases weight loss could be considered as a part of the therapeutic approach for urinary incontinence in people who are overweight. The objective of this study was to review and meta-analyse the effect of non-surgical weight loss interventions on urinary incontinence in overweight women. Web of Science, PubMed, Pedro, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane were systematically searched for clinical trials that met the a priori set criteria. Data of women who participated in non-surgical weight loss interventions (diet, exercise, medication or a combination) were included in the meta-analysis. After removing duplicates, 62 articles remained for screening on title, abstract and full text. Six articles (totalling 2,352 subjects in the intervention groups) were included for meta-analysis. The mean change in urinary incontinence (reported as frequency or quantity, depending on the study) after a non-surgical weight loss intervention, expressed as standardized effect size and corrected for small sample sizes (Hedges' g), was -0.30 (95%CI = -0.47 to -0.12). This systematic review and meta-analysis shows evidence that a non-surgical weight loss intervention has the potential to improve urinary incontinence and should be considered part of standard practice in the management of urinary incontinence in overweight women.
© 2014 The Authors. obesity reviews © 2014 World Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; obesity; urinary incontinence; weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24754672     DOI: 10.1111/obr.12170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Health Consequences of Obesity in Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Hoi Lun Cheng; Sharon Medlow; Katharine Steinbeck
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Does body mass index influence the outcome of midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Ziyuan Xia; Jialei Qian; Yuntian Chen; Banghua Liao; Deyi Luo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Report and Research Agenda of the American Geriatrics Society and National Institute on Aging Bedside-to-Bench Conference on Urinary Incontinence in Older Adults: A Translational Research Agenda for a Complex Geriatric Syndrome.

Authors:  Camille P Vaughan; Alayne D Markland; Phillip P Smith; Kathryn L Burgio; George A Kuchel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  The impact of bariatric surgery on urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bhawana Purwar; Rufus Cartwright; Geraldo Cavalcanti; Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu; Ruwan Fernando; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Prevention of pelvic floor disorders: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion.

Authors:  Tony Bazi; Satoru Takahashi; Sharif Ismail; Kari Bø; Alejandra M Ruiz-Zapata; Jonathan Duckett; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Prevalence of stress urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life among women in Jordan: a correlational study.

Authors:  Fadi Sawaqed; Ahlam Al Kharabsheh; Mohammad Tout; Mohammad Zaidan; Hasan Khashram; Nadeem AlShunaigat
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.