Literature DB >> 24754297

Evaluation of visceral artery displacement by endograft delivery system insertion.

Blandine Maurel1, Adrien Hertault, Teresa Martin Gonzalez, Jonathan Sobocinski, Marielle Le Roux, Jessica Delaplace, Richard Azzaoui, Marco Midulla, Stéphan Haulon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the displacement of the aorta and its visceral branch ostia after insertion of a rigid system including a stiff guidewire and endograft delivery system during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
METHODS: Between January and May 2013, 20 consecutive patients (19 men; mean age 67.2 years, range 61-83) undergoing EVAR (n=13) or fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR, n=7) were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent an intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) acquisition after the insertion of the endograft delivery system. Each ceCBCT was loaded on a workstation and manually registered with the preoperative computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) in a way that optimized superposition of the spine from both images. The locations of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and of both renal artery ostia were depicted in 3D multiplanar reconstructions by 3 independent operators on the CTA and on the ceCBCT. Motion of the aortic segment at the level of the visceral arteries was estimated by the barycenter of the origin of the SMA and both renal arteries.
RESULTS: The ostium displacement between the CTA and ceCBCT images was 6.7 mm (range 2.2-13.5) for the SMA; 6.2 mm (2.5-13.5) and 6.4 mm (1.9-14.5) for the right and the left renal arteries, respectively; and 5.5 mm (2.3-11.4) for the aortic segment. The displacement was mostly posterosuperior and to the left (65%). The radiation dose and contrast volume required to perform the ceCBCT were 30% and 41%, respectively, of the amounts used in the EVAR procedures.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant displacement of the main aortic branches after rigid material insertion. Image fusion applications aimed at providing intraoperative guidance must allow an easy and rapid repositioning of the overlay during the procedure to match the deformation of the aortic anatomy during the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24754297     DOI: 10.1583/13-4471MR.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  4 in total

1.  Target vessel displacement during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair and its implications for the role of traditional computed tomography angiography roadmaps.

Authors:  Marloes M Jansen; Merel van der Stelt; Stefan P M Smorenburg; Cornelis H Slump; Joost A van Herwaarden; Constantijn E V B Hazenberg
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-09

2.  Preoperative Planning for Physician-Modified Endografts Using a Three-Dimensional Printer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Mitsuoka; Yasuhiko Terai; Yuta Miyano; Toyotaka Naitou; Junsuke Tanai; Shinji Kawaguchi; Shinnosuke Goto; Yujirou Miura; Masanao Nakai; Fumio Yamazaki
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2019-09-25

3.  Three-dimensional printed templates to guide fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair are not as straightforward as they appear.

Authors:  Benjamin W Starnes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-02-20

4.  Image Fusion During Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair, to Fuse or Not to Fuse? A Meta-analysis and Additional Data From a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Sabrina A N Doelare; Stefan P M Smorenburg; Theodorus G van Schaik; Jan D Blankensteijn; Willem Wisselink; Johanna H Nederhoed; Rutger J Lely; Arjan W J Hoksbergen; Kak Khee Yeung
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.487

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.